<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Garmin falls from its pedestal</title><link>http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2008/04/30/what-s-wrong-with-garmin.aspx</link><description>Garmin 's days as a high-flying stock are over. Shares are down 11% today, hitting a two-year low after the company reported weak first-quarter profit and sales numbers . The quarter wasn't bad -- profit rose nearly 6% and sales were up 35% -- but analysts</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Garmin falls from its pedestal</title><link>http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2008/04/30/what-s-wrong-with-garmin.aspx#79456</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:14:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e8f7cd84-7062-45ca-8a00-3f24dfc10bb9:79456</guid><dc:creator>Don F</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Garmin, needs to re-visit their business model. Granted new and higher margin&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;prodcuts will help. But do they really think they can compete in these markets with&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verizon, Apple, AT&amp;amp;T, etc...? &amp;nbsp;A good move on their part would be to take care of the customer base they&amp;#39;ve already attracted. By providing update&amp;#39;s that are &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;affordable, allowing for the trade in of obsolete equipment,and not trying to force customer loyalty. When the economy is good,and your the only guy on the block you can get away with conducting business the way they do. But with added competition, and a downturn in the economy I think your seeing the results of Garmin trying to perform &amp;quot; business as usual&amp;quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=79456" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Garmin falls from its pedestal</title><link>http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2008/04/30/what-s-wrong-with-garmin.aspx#78709</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:00:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e8f7cd84-7062-45ca-8a00-3f24dfc10bb9:78709</guid><dc:creator>Chuck Wenk..Wenk Aviation Ins. Agency</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Cessna, Beech, Cirrus, what is left of Piper and all the others still making pistons, turbines and jets all ran to Garmin and proudly waved warranties for the &amp;quot;glass panels&amp;quot;....now, hopefully, they will bring or be forced to bring, their prices way, way down to reasonable levels and the Citations and Lears will lead the way along with the new small jets so if Garmin sees the light they will still be around. &amp;nbsp;They had a nice run and still are having one but the price was way to much on every model! &amp;nbsp;This is a recession now and 100 Octane is 6 bucks a gallon! &amp;nbsp;Garmin had to get real at last! &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=78709" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Garmin falls from its pedestal</title><link>http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2008/04/30/what-s-wrong-with-garmin.aspx#78608</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:12:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e8f7cd84-7062-45ca-8a00-3f24dfc10bb9:78608</guid><dc:creator>Bill O'Brien</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The key to Garmin&amp;#39;s future growth is its diversification. The perspective pertaining to the company&amp;#39;s products focuses too sharply on its PND products. This recent quarter&amp;#39;s figures proved that the company can and will sustain growth in its marine &amp;amp; aviation segments. Garmin is not merely a navigation company as its upcoming Nuvi phone will show. The company is an electronic device company.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is infrequently mentioned that the company has zero long term debt and 35% insider ownership. Two very important factors which are conducive to being able to sustain periods of slow growth and the desire to achieve successful results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=78608" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>