How to beat the hackers at their own game - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

How to beat the hackers at their own game

Posted Aug 05 2009, 11:42 AM by Minyanville
Rating:

This article was written by Minyanville's Josh Lipton

The first publicly known cyberspace attack came in the 1980’s, when the KGB hired West German hackers to penetrate U.S. military and research networks.

In the years since, cybersecurity attacks against both military and civilian installations have become more sophisticated and well publicized. In 2007, the departments of Defense, State, Homeland Security, and Commerce and NASA all suffered major intrusions by unknown foreign entities, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Perhaps not surprisingly, then, President Barack Obama has made cybersecurity a priority of his administration. “[I]t’s now clear this cyber threat is one of the most serious economic and national security challenges we face as a nation,” he said in a speech in May. And on Monday, the White House’s acting cybersecurity czar announced her resignation. So, for now, the White House cybersecurity post is still unfilled.

(See also: Seven Addictions to Replace Your Hacked iPhone)

However, the threat from foreign enemies and rogue hackers continues, threatening both public and private sector cyber infrastructure. It also presents potential money making profits for companies developing technologies to beat back the cyber threat, and for nimble investors thinking about market opportunities.

What motivates the cyber criminal? Michael Lewis, a senior research equity analyst at BB&T who covers defense, points to a few broad reasons.

First: information theft. Hackers are often looking to steal data from a targeted personal device, system, or network. For instance, Lewis notes the case of a disgruntled employee from Boeing (BA) who removed more than 320,000 sensitive computer files using a thumb drive to tap the corporate system. Boeing estimates that the stolen information could have cost up to $15 billion in lost revenue had it been sold.

A second goal: information disruption. A ne’er-do-well, armed with digital know-how, might sneak into Uncle Sam’s systems and mess with critical operating data. In 2006, for instance, a disgruntled Navy contractor inserted malicious code into five computers at the Navy’s European Planning and Operations Command in Naples, Italy, rendering two computers inoperable. If three others had been knocked down, according to Lewis, the network that tracks US and NATO ships in the Mediterranean would have collapsed.

Finally, there is what Lewis refers to as information denial, those pesky hacks who shut down private or government computer systems with floods of automated hits.

Whatever their motivation, hackers are capable of causing a potentially great deal of damage very quickly, whether it’s to national security or a company’s bottom line. In 2008 alone, cyber criminals ripped off intellectual property from businesses worldwide worth up to $1 trillion.

“What the public has to understand is that the threat of cyber thieves accessing individual confidential information or national security information is only growing,” Lewis told Minyanville.

As the cyber threat continues, Lewis and his crew of analysts project that the cyber security market will grow in the 8% to 11% range through government fiscal year 2014, and he hastens to add that he thinks those projections are based on conservative assumptions.

Within his coverage universe, the analyst believes that the primary competition in the cyber-domain will likely include ManTech International (MANT). “Their core business is related to the intelligence community, which will be leading the charge in the cyber growth area,” he says.

He also thinks CACI International (CACI) will benefit, given its strong position in the US Army intelligence area, as will L-3 Communications (LLL). “They will benefit in two ways: they have a large IT business and they have a strong position with the US Navy.”

Other primary competitors in the cyber-domain, according to Lewis, include Applied Signal Technology (APSG), Argon ST (STST), Dynamics Research (DRCO), NCI (NCIT), and SRA International (SRX).

No positions in stocks mentioned

Related Articles

Robot wars hit wall street

It's make or break for technology stocks

Tech sectors hold key to market bounce

Comments

 

If this is such a priority, why is President Obama PERSONALLY selecting the next cyber "czar?" What qualifies him? I notice that the current head of cybersecurity just resigned.

www.washingtonpost.com/.../AR2009080302697_pf.html

Yeah, big priority.

Does anyone read the news?

Why would this be something big now a days. This has been around for a long time. If we are that far behind on it then we deserve what we get. Congress only reacts when there is a problem. When they react they always go too far one direction or another. Wake up you idiots and do this country a service and not the diservice you are currently doing. There may be only really 2 political parties but it is one nation.

Being a hacker myself in the early 1980's (in the DOS) years, I do know that hacking is an evovling intellectual challenge, not unlike playing chess. As companies like Microsoft, etc. make prettier and easir to use programs that can do more and more it takes much more code. Programs have grown to sizes that were unimaginable just a few years ago. This in turn leaves many many places to find away into the program or back door, so to speak. If you notice how many security updates you get with Windows or any operating system ( at least two a week ), these are the holes discovered or have been exploited. There are many more and they will always be changing. As software companies need to increase their bottom line, they always most come out with something newer and bigger, so that you must buy it.  Windows 7 for instance and the whole war of security will begin all over again. It is just part of technology growth, watch out when robots hit the streets !  LOL

It's time to up the criminal penalties for non-voilent crime that ruins lives and cost average Joe.  White collar thievery is rampant.  CEO's and congressmen are litterally stealing money from the lower classes without remorse.  Things have got to change before anarchy rules.

Like Jerry posted ahead of me, I learned of "hacking" as a from the terms of the DOS "cracker" (I never was really that good at computers, but most hacking took place by cracking).  Then I somehow got a flash of the future when I realized that this was all going to come down to being a peeping tom, and that's about it.  Even though I unplugged my life it wasn't enough, when I got back to computers and the internet (strictly on a user level) most of the things that we used to do by hand or DOS, that we considered hacks are now done in clicks ON MAINSTREAM AND ACCEPTED SOFTWARE.  Over the years our lives are so anchored into what used to be just intellectual property.  Now it's a weapon that gives real results, results that ruin lives and reputations.  I think back then we already knew though that hacking into a personal computer was like winning the special olympics for an average joe.  Now it's a weapon used to empty someones bank account or insurance and destroy their lives.  While the profile for hackers/crackers changed from the 90's til today, those today had better take a look at what is going to happen when the rage of the outdated catch up to knowledge now that is so easily learned.  WE WILL BE BACK AND THIS TIME WE WON'T STOP, IT'S NOT A PLAYGROUND FOR CHAT ANYMORE AND NOW WE KNOW THAT.

10 YEARS FROM NOW DON'T FORGET TO LOCK YOUR DOOR.

The Liberal Purge is on.  Now secondary and tertiary positions are being purged by the Obama Administration.

This was never a surprising move.   Obama has purged the existing people in the know and replaced them with newbies (a political move) that are uninformed.  The Security administration is a perfect example.  Obama had to back peddle on Gitmo, on Israel, on immigration, and on many many other issues, because the information he was getting was incomplete or poor.

Joel Rosenburg's books, Inside the Revolution, and Epicenter detail the intelligence used to protect America, and now Obama is literally purging any knowledgeable people.   We are at great risk.

On June 4th David Kris, an espionage agent for Castro was arrested, As reported by Dr. David Noebel in the Schwartz report, August 2009, Volume 49 Number 8.  

Removing people in the know makes it harder to catch the thieves, spies, etc.  

Another choice move by the Obama Administration....

I want to know what's going on with our president and all these CZARS? Are these so called czars only to answer to him? As far as one person typed about all the purging of people in the know being done. It's a fact, obama isn't doing us any favors by putting cronies in place that are only loyal to him. Where is the media's reporting on all this? There's something pretty shady going on that the American people better become aware of. This guy comes out of nowhere to become president. I want to know who's pulling his strings and why.

Does this all sound paraniod? Well it should because we seem to be handing America to the whole world except ourselves. I for one am not liking this CHANGE that was touted.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):