Is the housing market recovering? - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Is the housing market recovering?

Posted Jul 29 2009, 11:29 AM by Anthony Mirhaydari
Rating:

The bruised and battered housing market is finally showing signs of life.

In the last few days, we've learned that new and existing home sales rose 11% and 3.6% respectively in June compared to May. June housing starts are up 3.5% to 582,000 -- the highest reading since last November. And home prices, as reported by the Case-Shiller Home Price Index, actually increased in the three months to May. This breaks a string of 34 straight months of decline.

So is it time to pop the champagne, call up your real estate agent, and return to the heady house-flipping days of 2005? Not quite.

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but there are still a number of issues hanging over the housing market. First, interest rates look ready to rise as the U.S. government finances its massive budget deficit just as corporate and international borrowers look to bypass tightfisted banks and raise cash directly from the capital markets. This will push up historically low mortgage rates and squeeze affordability. Check out my post from Tuesday on this topic.

Two, according to Gluskin Sheff economist David Rosenberg, as the mortgage problem becomes upwardly mobile and moves from subprime borrowers to upper-crust prime borrowers, more expensive homes are being foreclosed upon. In his words:

"…an increasing number of high-end homes are now entering the foreclosure sales process, which are skewing these price indices higher after a prolonged period when the data were being pulled down by the preponderance of ever-cheaper subprime units hitting the auction market. As an aside, at the beginning of the year when prices were sliding more than 2% per month, half the sales were coming from foreclosures auction and many of these were low-end units; now the foreclosure share is down to 30% and more of these are higher-end homes seeing as prime-based mortgage default rates are now rising faster than subprime."

Three, a recent moratorium on foreclosures is ending. Banks, mindful of their damaged public image and hoping for great things from the Obama Administration's homeowner assistance plan, decided to take a wait-and-see approach. They waited. They saw. They were disappointed. And now, as unemployment continues to rise, banks are once again clamping down on delinquent homeowners. This promises to unleash another flood of distressed property onto the market just as buyers were beginning to overwhelm supply.

And finally, the reason everyone got excited about the home sales data earlier this week was because it indicated that supply was falling, boding well for further price stabilization. New home inventory plunged from 10.2 months' supply to a three-year low of 8.8 months -- down from a high of 12.4 months in March. Moreover, the number of units under construction fell to a 42-year low.

But there is a huge glut of vacant homes will mop up demand and dampen prices. Of the 130.8 million housing units in the United States, 18.7 million are vacant. At the current rate new households are being formed, which Rosenberg puts at 800,000 annually, it will take more than 20 years to work off this inventory.

Plus, there are a large number of homeowners, especially those with negative equity, that are eagerly waiting for an improved housing market to sell into. A recent Zillow survey found that one-third of all homeowners would be willing to sell their home if prices improved. This means there is a "shadow" inventory of between 11 million and 30 million homes. Add to this a rental vacancy rate of 10.6% or 6.6 million units (an all-time high) for apartments and rental homes, and it's clear we have far too many homes given the falling number of the employed.

 

Surely, this means we've yet to fully deflate the home price bubble even as prices have fallen 33% since the peak in 2006. In this context, the 30% rise in the S&P Homebuilders Index (XHB) looks like a false dawn.

Disclosure: The author does not own or control a position in any of the funds or companies mentioned.

Anthony Mirhaydari is a researcher for the Strategic Advantage investment newsletter. He can be contacted at anthony.mirhaydari@live.com. Feel free to comment below. 

Related reading: 

More trouble ahead for housing

Housing recovery under way (just not here)

Interest rates climb on new borrowing

Forget China; Look at France and Italy

Comments

 

Well, too much of a talk and analysis crap. Over 14,000,000 lost jobs need to be recover ASAP the remained are just meaning less

Housing will "recover" once prices decrease to make housing truly affordable (aka, have some relationship to income).  As David alludes to, employment needs to improve as well, pretty hard to buy a house if you don't have a job.  Fundementals don't lie, everything else is just permabull/Realitwhore™ hype or corporate maneuvering for additional bailouts (at our expense) later on.  

Banks and mortgage lenders are holding some of their foreclosed properties off the market, hoping for improving prices and not wanting to drive down prices even more by flooding the market.  Are these numbers being reflected in the housing statistics that are currently being bantered?  Or are we just moving sideways, with more units being released to market each time there is a slight up tic in the data?

The fall in housing prices is starting to moderate but will continue to decline as long as unemployment continues to rise. The high inventory levels and pent up shadow supply will cause housing prices to find a "new norm" at levels close to where they are today for several years to come. Appreciation in home values is a long way off.

No jobs = no money => no houses. Our government had decided to take tax payers money to help banks. Banks took advantage to hold lost. Our Fed scream out loud that bank did not lend their money. Small bussiness can not get money to function => let go employees.

   Please focus to all American. We need more jobs now!!

Here in San Diego housing has really turned around. In the 400k and under category it is a challenge to get an offer accepted because the competition is fierce. The banks are listing them low to create a bidding war and it is working. You have to come in above list to even stand a chance at the bank owned properties. This is old data that they are looking at. I think you will see the July numbers are even better still, I know they are a lot better where I am at least. People see interest rates going up and home prices have increased some as well. Also, you have to buy before December 1st to get the tax credit. So ya, we are definately seeing housing turn.

I'm curious to learn, Mr. Mirhaydari, how the sales of new homes by construction lenders if either filtered out of the statistics or if included, how it is labeled? It would seem that such data would have a dramatic affect on housing statistics each month. In the Northwest where I live a good number of small lenders are under pressure from FDIC examiners to remove those assets from their balance sheets as quickly as possible. Some institutions form LLCs for capital maintenance and tax reasons to manage the disposition of those properties, to include lots and land. While loan administrators were under government guidance in regard to foreclosures I suspect that the residential construction lenders were and are not and have been selling new homes as quickly as they can, competing at times with their own remaining builders, with each other, and with the existing homes sells. In the Northwest those numbers have to make up a substantial portion of the new home sells and I see no reason why such a phenomenon wouldn't be happening nationwide.

99.9% of the world could care less about San Diego housing since we ALL cant afford to live there..The USA will be as China with EVERYBODY living in state owned apartments....deal with it Citizens

Hey dbellis, If you are looking to purchase in San Diego, just go ahead and over-bid, since it is all contingent on the appraisal anyways, for example, if a property is listed for $400,000 and there are other bidders yet you really want the property, put in a bid of $420,000. It doesnt matter, chances are that $400,000 listing will not even appraise for 400K, in which case the seller has to reduce the price. No lender will lend on a property for more than the appraised value(with the exception being an all-cash offer, very rare these days).

Well, San Diego is very nice, but 400K still won't get you into a decent neighborhood!

And, all of those circa WW2 frame houses in Normal Heights, for example, that are 800 sq ft and 2bd/1 bath and are still priced at 400K is ridiculous, and will not appraise today for 400K as "Mortgage Guy" says.

But, go ahead and bid away!    

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):