8 lifestyles of the rich and incompetent - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

8 lifestyles of the rich and incompetent

Posted Jul 20 2009, 07:17 AM by Minyanville
Rating:

Take a look at Minyanville's collection of eight lifestyles of the rich and incompetent...

A couple of years ago, a study called "Where Are the Shareholders’ Estates?" by Arizona State University professor Crocker Liu and New York University professor David Yermack, asserted: “Future company performance deteriorates when CEOs acquire extremely large or costly mansions and estates."

The researchers' sources of information included property deeds, tax records, online databases such as Zillow.com and Reply.com, Google searches, employment contracts and voter registration data.

Their findings certainly show a privileged class:

The median home was valued at $2.7 million -- more than 10 times the median sales price for all U.S. homes in 2004.

It included 11 rooms plus 4.5 bathrooms, with a floor area of more than 5,600 square feet and a median land area of 1.25 acres.

12% of CEOs' homes are situated on waterfronts; 8.5%  are next to or on the grounds of golf courses.

The median CEO lives 12.5 miles away from corporate headquarters, though 6% of those in the study lived more than 250 miles or more away -- meaning it takes a plane ride to get to the office.

CEOs often buy new homes the year they get the "big" job, with a total of 164 S&P 500 executives doing so in this survey. To finance their purchases, the authors found that 44% used mortgages, almost evenly split between adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans.

More interesting is that about one-third of CEOs appear to have exercised stock options and sold shares in the 12 months before they made a home purchase. The shares peaked right before the home was bought.

That doesn't mean that they necessarily sold those shares and then used the proceeds to buy their homes. The authors felt the timing of those equity moves was more than just coincidence, however, because the companies' share prices began to fall after that peak.

The study's authors found that a CEO who acquires an extremely large property generally exhibits inferior stock performance, as does a CEO who sold his or her firm's shares and options within 12 months prior to the purchase. A CEO who does not sell any shares to finance their house shows better stock performance.

"The stock charts show that some CEOs might be very motivated sellers who are rolling money into a home," Yermack said. "Home purchases could be a ruse. If you are going to dump stock, you can buy a house to cover your tracks."

Those living really large are the 12% of S&P 500 CEOs with homes topping 10,000 square feet, or on a minimum of 10 acres.

But occupying the biggest house on the block doesn't make you a winner on Wall Street. Their companies' stocks lagged the S&P 500 by about 25% over the three years after the CEOs' home purchases. In contrast, those buying more modestly saw their companies' stocks beat the market benchmark by about the same amount.

Does their thesis hold up? Minyanville took a look at snapshots of actual CEO homes versus their company’s performance to find out -- and found some serious lifestyles of the rich and incompetent.

Eight lifestyles of the rich and incompetent

Top Stocks blogging partner Todd Harrison is founder & CEO of Minyanville.com. This post was written by Minyanville Contributor Justin Rohrlich.

Related Articles

The ten worst direct-to-video movies of all time

Ten most horrific commercial jingles of all time

USB air-conditioned shirt

Comments

 

America - we make some of the best crooks on the planet.

America-home of the brave...and greedy.

And these are the same guys that run US Companies no wonder the economy is in the mess it is in...

Absolutely, youwish, I just wish they'd do it somewhere else and leave the United States alone, China perhaps.

Saying that the CEO purchasing a nice house is going to bring down a company is a pretty ridiculous interpretation of the data collected.  The fact is, CEOs buy big houses when their companies are doing extremely well.  Guess what naturally has to happen after a company reaches its peak?  It declines, of course!

This is like the "Sports Illustrated Curse" where people draw a correlation between being featured on the cover of Sports Illustrated with the decline of an athlete's career.  You don't get on the cover without being at a peak and how many people can maintain that level of greatness? It's an indicator, not a cause.

Is it me or does a CEO selling shares always look negative resulting in a loss of stockholder confidence regardless of what he uses the money for?

your best doctors in the country do not earn anywhere near what these thieves make

I don't think buying the big house is the problem - It's buying the big house and not having the company you command do well.   Paying for substandard performance

bondo very true, but your best doctors don't offer you the opportunity to invest as a shareholder and join them in the profit making.

It’s been this way for a long time with rich people and their real estate.

If you look into the history of the Newport Mansions you will find that many of these extraordinary homes were sold and resold many times for fractions of what their owners originally spent to build or rehab them.

Cornelius Vanderbilt II spent $7 million dollars to build “The Breakers” between 1983 and 1895. That’s approximately $150 million in today's dollars adjusted for inflation (and this was his vacation cottage).

By 1950 one of his daughters was leasing the property to the Newport Preservation Society for $1/year. Eventually, in 1972, another one of Cornelius’ descendants sold the home to the Society for $365,000. It wasn’t a total bust though. As part of the deal, some of his heirs still have rights to reside in the top floor of the mansion.  

When I took a tour of The Breakers a few years ago the tour guide told us that Cornelius only managed to spend two weeks of his entire life in the home before he died.  

en.wikipedia.org/.../The_Breakers

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):