Why earnings season will disappoint - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Why earnings season will disappoint

Posted Jul 08 2009, 03:34 PM by Anthony Mirhaydari
Rating:

There's nothing quite like earnings season. Three months of hope and fear condensed into the span of a few weeks as executives open the veil and let investors have a look. With Alcoa (AA) kicking things off Wednesday afternoon with an earnings beat (-26 cents per share against a -38 cent estimate), everyone is looking for signs the economy has truly begun the long march to recovery.

Unfortunately, with earnings expectations already pricing in a rather optimistic scenario, the results will likely disappoint.

While earnings estimates were slashed as the last two quarters rolled on, estimates for the second quarter have only decreased slightly since March. In fact, earnings expectations have actually increased slightly since bottoming back in May. In other words, stock analysts have become more confident not just in the economy's health, but in their own forecasts as well.

For Q408, the share-weighted earnings estimate for the S&P 500 dropped 33% from beginning of the quarter. For Q109, it dropped 28%. But for Q209, it has fallen just 1%.

According to Thomson Reuters, the current second-quarter earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 is at -35.5%. Back in May, it was at -36.2%. At the beginning of the quarter, it was at 31.7%. All ten sector groups are expected to post a drop in earnings, but the materials, energy, financials, and industrials sectors will be the hardest hit.

It's not just the analysts who are feeling good about the future: Executives have taken the negative-to-positive earnings pre-announcement ratio to very low levels. It was at 4.7 heading into the Q109 earnings season but has since dropped to just 1.5. The long-term average for the S&P 500 is 2.1.

I find it hard to believe, based on the economic data seen to date, that something spectacular happened over the last three months that justifies this kind of earnings optimism. Job losses have re-accelerated. Energy prices were elevated. Consumer confidence has soured. Home prices are still falling.

What's worse is that even with these inflated earnings expectations the market is still far from a bargain at current levels. The forward price-to-earnings ratio for the S&P 500 now stands at around 13.2x. Using historical data courtesy of Yale professor Robert Shiller, which goes all the way back to 1871, the average price-to-earnings ratio is 15x. In comparison, back at the March the ratio was just 11.7x. 

Indeed when looking at past market bottoms, such as the October 1990 low when the forward multiple declined to 10.5x, I wouldn't be surprised if a retest of the March low was in order to properly account for the epic credit bubble that just burst.

Disclosure: The author does not own or control a position in any of the funds or companies mentioned.

Anthony Mirhaydari is a researcher for the Strategic Advantage investment newsletter. He can be contacted at anthony.mirhaydari@live.com. Feel free to comment below. 

Related reading: 

True unemployment rate already at 20%

Making sense of the selloff

Oil prices are ready to fall

Consumer worrywarts threaten stock rally

Comments

 

Anthony, I feel you are right on. There is no reason for optomism. I am no economist but a common guy who can not find a job. What I see is people who can not pay their bills, losing their homes,and have too much credit debt. All we hear from business and government is borrow- borrow- borrow. It is unsustainable. We must go on a pay as you go routine. The stock market is NOT indictative of what is going on on main street.Multinational corporations might make some money from overseas but that doesn't help us here.  

Anthony,

Week after week I read your bearish caterwauling, and its getting old.  You should get a job with Tech-Ticker at Yahoo, you would fit in well there.  Are you aware that stocks often bottom well before recovery is acknowledged, and furthermore, the initial stages of a recovery are swift and sudden (mar - may).  Did it occur to you that analysts are raising their estimates because businesses are more efficient due to the massive cost cutting that has occurred?

Balanced Trader,

What initial recovery stages? I hate to say it, but in his own weirdly written way Anthony is correct.

Jobs are still being cut at a massive level (the pathetic joke that only 550000 new claims for unemployment last week is a good thing because they were expecting 590000? WTF?). Remember a short 18 months ago when people were alarmed at 325000 new claims? None of this is good news.

Obama and his merry gang are about to destroy two key industries with current legislation (health care and drilling) and those jobs WON'T come back. I've heard the BS line about "businesses becoming more efficient" but it is just patently false. Why? We were already near peak efficiency. What we're seeing now is business SHRINKAGE, not efficiency. Note the difference?

I used to be the most bullish guy on the planet. I had a picture of Fleckenstein on my dart board. Now I see the direction we're going and I've turned into a large grizzly bear. I'm in bonds and cash for a reason. I don't want to be hosed by the coming crash.

Bill,

The article is titled "Why earnings season will disappoint" yet I see no new information to support this thesis other than that which the market has already discounted.  I am not arguing that the current job losses are bad.  What should be clear though is that the down trend of most indicators has broken and we have entered an inflection point. Remember, the market usually leads an actual recovery, and jobs losses is the most lagging of all indicators.

Additionally, you opinion looses credibility the moment you mix politics with trading/investing.  It appears that you may be letting you political beliefs cloud you judgment.

Of course I mix political observation (not my political beliefs) with investing. Only a fool doesn't. I made a nice tidy sum during the Clinton years, even though I loathed the man. His policies were not designed to wreck markets. Open your eyes.

One thing about last weeks unemployment numbers. How much higher would they have been if the 3rd wasn't a federal holiday?

Geez, I'm too old for this bickering.

With the economy of California going down in flames with no end in sight, all as a result of politics, I am now a solid bear also. I'm holding stocks only for the dividends and watching from the sidelines. Let's hope that more states do not follow California's bust! I'm with Anthony.

An absolute pessimist which i am very sure does not invest in the market himself, dear anthony, you should get a grip and make some real money rather than popping pessimist pills and manifesting it in your article. i made a avg 81% return from oct08 to may09. all that money floating around must be trying to buy something! fundamentals does not matter.

Market is drive by news.The one who create the news is media.Media made fake news and numbers always.That's why the ramp up in stock from oct08 to May09 is a bubble.Stay put and wait until unemployment rate getting better will start buying again.

Another swing and miss by Anthony.  Lets review...

CSX - beat

GS - huge beat

AA - beat

JNJ - beat...

And the market responds with the bigset move up in months.  I was long and grew my account by 13% yesterday between FAS and ERX.  Thank you to all the pessimists on the other side of the trade, you made me a little richer.

This guy is an idiot

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):