Google takes aim at Microsoft's core - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Google takes aim at Microsoft's core

Posted Jul 08 2009, 05:11 PM by James Dlugosch
Rating:

So I visited www.bing.com searching the words, “operating system”. At the top of the results page I find a story on Google’s plan to launch its own operating system in direct competition with Bing owner Microsoft's most critical product.

Now that is good humor. I suppose if I went to www.google.com and typed in the word, “search”, I would get a story on Microsoft’s Bing. (Editor's note: Microsoft publishes MSN Money.)

Watching this latest competition between Microsoft (MSFT) and Google (GOOG) (Read "Will Google's Chrome Chip Away at Microsoft"s Veneer?" for my take on the details) will provide amusing story lines for years to come. Most interesting is that the stakes here are so huge. 

Microsoft’s death grip on operating systems has been in place since the birth of the personal computer. Google, the upstart, dominates the search category has helped redefine Internet use and advertising.

As is typical of Microsoft, it has been incredibly envious of Google’s effort and success. Millions of dollars have been spent in efforts to better compete in search, including a failed attempt to purchase Yahoo (YHOO).

At the same time, Google and its open system environment made clear its intentions to be more than just search. While being subtle about strategy, there was no doubt that the upstart planned to compete directly with Microsoft on its home turf.

Now we learn just how real those plans are. In a blog announcement last night, Google stated that it would launch an operating system in the near future. Targeting low priced notebook computers, the company said it would make the software available to customers in the second half of 2010.

Look past the sensational headline and I see desperation here. This Hail Mary move is directly correlated to the surprising success Microsoft is having with the launch of its search engine, Bing.

While it is a big deal that Google will compete head to head with Microsoft's OS, the launch of the product is still a year away or more. In technology terms, that is a lifetime. Anything can happen between now and then.

The reason for the release now is that Google is rightly petrified that Bing is making some serious inroads. I suspect there is plenty of inside information to suggest that Bing is doing better than anyone could have ever guessed.

Any sane person would recognize the vulnerability of Google. With very few barriers to entry, competition could be expected. Where Google excelled was with branding and simplicity.

The customer is used to using Google and not likely to change. Or so we thought. Perhaps a change to Bing is easier than expected.

What investors in Google counted on was the ineptitude of Microsoft, but that ineptitude looks to be replaced by fortitude and persistence. Bing is a nice product, and I would be worried if I were Google.

As for operating systems, we have seen this game before. Microsoft has destroyed others that have encroached on its space. It is easier for me to see success competing in search than it is competing in operating systems.

Since Bing was launched, shares of Google have dropped hard. They saw a very small bump on the news of the operating system. Microsoft shares, on the other hand, have been appreciating nicely.

5 Cheap Stocks to Buy Now 

Going forward, I expect that trend to continue. This is setting up to be a great pair trade: Go long Microsoft and short Google. This Google announcement smells like panic to me. At a minimum, it should raise your eyebrows too.

If you are interested in speculating on low-priced stocks, I launched a new service called, Penny Stock Winners. Please check it out.

Editors Note: Microsoft publishes MSN Money.
 

Related Articles:

 

Comments

 

A crucial difference between Microsoft's near-monopoly in operating systems (Windows) and Google's near-monopoly in web search is that Microsoft's product is far more entrenched and difficult to switch from.  Changing search sites is as easy as typing "bing.com" instead of "google.com" in your web browser, but changing operating systems typicallyrequires substantial technical skills, new application software, an elaborate backup and restore procedure, and a significant learning curve.

Google's intent of getting into the OS business has been apparent for years, ever since Google Desktop, Chrome, and other such utilities and apps became available.  I could foresee Google fans just using Windows as a bootstrap to load their computer's basic operating functions, with Google software increasingly taking over for key operations once the PC is booted up.  From there, it's a short step to just loading a Google OS from the start.

Overlooking the obvious slant of the article, if Google can get a decent OS onto retail machines, they have a chance.  If the OS is good enough, Apple may lose some market share, as well.

I am waiting for the Google OS with anticpation. I expect good things for it. Microsoft has a death grip on the OS's it will be hard for people to let go. Hopefully Google's OS will be easier to use with more freedom then Microsoft's Windows.

It's all about compatibility.  Will windows apps be compatible w/ chrome.  Can you run Word on chrome.  If it's not compatible, like Mac's OS, it won't sell.  That's why Macs market share doesn't grow.  MS has a monopoly and only the Fed Antitrust Division can fine them till they give up secrets of their OS kernal and allow others to compete like Chrome.  This is why European Union (EU) courts are fining MS billions lately to give up their Kernal secrets so EU server software firms can compete.

The key concept is the public's ownership of a majority compatibility standard. Similar to power lines and railroad tracks where competition isn't feasible.  There can only be one standard OS that the majority will use because of compatibility.  A good example is VHS VCR format vs Beta in the 80s.

We only allow drug companies 17 years on their patents before we force the surrender of the generic formula.  EU judges are on the right track.  MS should be sued until they surrender they "public standards" kernal.  

The public owns the compatibility rights once a product becomes a majority in industries where there can only be one compatible standard.  That's why railroads and utilities are government regulated so these natural monopolies can't abuse the public like MS has been allowed to do.  The days of MS gouging the public for $300 for their OS should be over.  

It's time to apply the heat on MS as the EU courts are doing.  Of course MS can't bribe public officials with corrupt campaign contributions like they can here in the US.  We have the best democracy money can buy.    

It seems to me that the 'gimme-gimmie-gimme' mentality of the majority of today's society is getting way out of hand. Why should Microsoft, who has diligently and with great effort and expense developed the best operating system in the world be forced to just turn over their technology to the general, world-wide public? I believe in "Free Enterprise" and I believe that if Google is capable and has the entrepeneurship to develope a better O/S than windows, power to them,--but not at the expense of Microsoft. Seems everyone, including the E/U is just dying to benefit any way they can at Microsoft's expense. I believe that Bill Gates & Co. have earned every right to protect their intellectual property & I believe there are too many entities in the universe today wanting a piece of their cake but without expending any effort. I applaud Google for making the attempt but I'll stick to my Windows O/S, thank you very much! Corrupt campaign contributions??? By Microsoft? Guess I missed the boat on that one! I guess the Gates foundation must be corrupt too???

I'd really like to see this operating system. I hope it's better than gOS, I couldn't get it to work well on my computer. I am a Linux user, however I do dual boot with Windows XP because I need windows for some programs. All I know is this, there is already 1 Free Operating System that is out there Linux - it does not get viruses or spyware, you dont have to worry about somethings that you do with a Window OS, and it is much more safe and secure. With that in mind Microsoft still dominates the market with Windows.

So what exactly are the benefits to using Chrome because I have not heard of 1!

I nearly thought this was going to be an unbiased news story.  Nearly.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):