Why China's economic 'miracle' can't last - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Why China's economic 'miracle' can't last

Posted May 19 2009, 02:36 PM by admin
Rating:

China flag  © Jeremy Woodhouse/Photodisc/Getty Images

By Vitaliy N. Katsenelson

Be careful about investing your hard-earned dollars in China's economic 'miracle.'

One should not confuse China's swift economic growth -- retail sales up 14.8%, industrial production up 7.3% and car production ahead 18% -- with sustainable growth.
 
The US consumer is deleveraging and the global appetite for goods is declining -- and Chinese exports dropped 22.6% in April.

This raises a question: How can China, with its mainly export economy, thrive when its exports are falling?

The answer is that today's China is a story of two competing economies: the real economy, producing goods and services for mostly external consumption, which is declining at a tremendous rate; and the economy stimulated by government spending, which is currently expanding as if on steroids.

The second one is clearly keeping things going right now. Here's how:

  • The Chinese central bank has a significant advantage over ours. The Fed can print a lot of money -- and it has -- but there's almost nothing it can do to speed spending. The Fed cannot force corporations and consumers to spend. Since China isn't a democracy, it doesn't suffer this limitation of a democracy.
  • China's communist government owns a large part of the money-creation and money-spending apparatus. As a result, money supply shot up 25.5% in March. And, since the government controls the banks, it forced them to lend more money out.
  • Finally, China can force government-owned corporate entities to borrow and spend. And the government can spend quickly, which is important when trying to build infrastructure. If the Chinese government decides to build a highway, it simply draws a straight line on the map. Any obstacle -- even a hospital or a school -- becomes a casualty of the greater good.

Why China has to stimulate

The Chinese government goes to great lengths to stimulate its economy because it doesn't have the kind of social safety net one sees in the developed world. It needs to keep its economy going at any cost.

Millions of people have migrated to its cities, and now they're hungry and unemployed. People without food or work tend to riot; to keep that from happening, the government is more than willing to artificially stimulate the economy, in the hopes of buying time until the global system restabilizes.

This type of growth is simply not sustainable, as it comes from borrowing. Its quality is low -- hundreds of billion-dollar decisions made on the fly don't inspire a lot of confidence in their efficacy. It will result in a huge pile of bad debt; simply put, forced lending is bad lending. The list of negative consequences is very long, but the bottom line is simple:

There is no miracle in China's miraculous growth, and China will pay a price. The only question is when the bill will come due and how big it will be.

Vitaliy N. Katsenelson, CFA, is director of research at Investment Management Associates in Denver, Colo., and he teaches a graduate investment class at the University of Colorado at Denver. He is the author of "Active Value Investing: Making Money in Range-Bound Markets" (Wiley 2007).

Related links:

Ford can't compete with Government Motors

3 ways to play to China explosion

US and China trade places

Comments

 

I have the same idea.  China's economy will not last any longer than 3 or most 4 years from now on if otherwise the economy of the rest of the world eg. Germany, France, States restabilized.

If China's economy is down sooner, it will come from its people who is socially unrest over many social issues and its corrupt government officials that directly victimized the people.

Good Reference about China

I suppose you are going to say that the World's biggest car market is America as well, all I have to say is that GM, Ford and the US government has stated that China is the World's biggest car market... they have said they owe China Trillions of Dollars... they have seen the competitive America become subservient to China maybe not now but probably in 10 years time China will officially take over from China.  In the 19th Century Britian was the dominant power, in the 20th Century it was America and in the 21st Century China shall become the dominant power... I feel sad when a fellow citizens lies to himself or is it under the orders of Emperor Obama and the clowns of Congress.

"This type of growth is simply not sustainable, as it comes from borrowing."

From BORROWING?  Mr. Katsenelson,are you referring to the U.S. economy or the Chinese one?  Everybody knows that China is the largest foreign creditor of the U.S. treasury and it has the largest foreign currency reserves in the world. So from whom do they borrow?  Mr. Katsenelson, I think you either need to be updated or do a thorough research before you comment on something you are NOT familiar with.

This is a simple-minded, stupid artcile written by a ideological ignoramus.

Seems like the US and China are on a parallel path and the author could substitue USA for China.  Only difference is US Government is buying debt, inefficient companies and maintaining unproductive citizens. China is buying infrastructure and long term investments. China does not have a social welfare system but they usually save about half of their income for lean times and they are motivated by hunger.  Luckily the USA has a government that can borrow to feed everybody and we can be fat, dumb and lazy--for now.

This reads like communist propaganda by simply switching the names

I'd like to see what she'd have to say about the economic outlook of the US through the same lens as this story and then some comments on which economy has the better outlook and which we should be more "careful about investing [our] hard-earned dollars".

Needless to say, you are clueless about foreign investing.  At least, get the facts straight, Mr. Katsenelson.

Synergy, you too.

HI,

I guess when Vitaliy N. Katsenelson  spoke of Borrowing it is china Internal borrowing which they have to replace by using the foreign reserves for INfrastructure projects . By the way i feel that China is more favorably placed and can use its huge FE reserves to simulate their economy , they need to find the political will to do that and i guess they will do that.They are surely well placed than US at this juncture.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):