You can keep your job -- if you move to India - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

You can keep your job -- if you move to India

Posted May 13 2009, 01:26 PM by Catherine Holahan
Rating:

Pink Slip © BananaStock/SuperStock

  A one-way ticket from France to Bangalore, India: $628

  Pay cut: 1,731 euros per month

  Avoiding a layoff: priceless?

  French textile workers were recently made an offer that most, undoubtedly, refused: relocate to India and work for local wages or lose their job. The Times of London reported May 12 that the Carreman company gave its employees the unenviable choice in part to comply with French labor laws. 

Carreman told workers they could keep their jobs if they moved to Bangalore at a 96% pay cut, according to the Times. They were not offered airline tickets. A recent online search put the cost of a one-way ticket from Charles De Gaulle airport in Paris to Bangalore airport at about $628, with a plane change.

Offshoring jobs to relatively cheaper Asian and Eastern European countries, such as India and the Czech Republic, has long been a subject of contentious debate in both Europe and the United States. But the global economic downturn has pushed the issue into the headlines again. Faced with sharp drops in demand, many companies are choosing to cut costs by moving jobs to cheaper countries. In March, IBM announced that it would cut 4,000 jobs and move them to India, sparking a public outcry.  Forrester research estimates that as many as 3.3 million jobs will move overseas by 2015.

The acceleration of work moving overseas has spurred politicians to take action. This month, President Barack Obama promised to close tax loopholes for companies that move work abroad (whether by hiring foreign workers for the same jobs, aka offshoring, or contracting out jobs to foreign companies, aka outsourcing, is not clear).

"I want to see our companies remain the most competitive in the world. But the way to make sure that happens is not to reward our companies for moving jobs off our shores or transferring profits to overseas tax havens," Obama said in a May 4 speech announcing plans to change the tax code to help discourage outsourcing.

French Prime Minister Nicolas Sarkozy has made similar promises, backing laws intended to reduce the number of jobs moving outside of France and offering to help bail out the country's auto industry only if the auto manufacturers did not move jobs to other countries.

The Carreman case is just one example of the consequences such laws can have, intended or not. IBM also offered to allow employees to keep their jobs if they moved abroad to cheaper countries.

Related links:

Extra: Outsourcing actually creates jobs, study finds

How you can still buy American

10 ways you can still buy American

Could Indian outsourcing be in trouble?

How Obama would fix the economy

Comments

 

Thomas Friedman is an absolute fraud.  He wants all American jobs to be moved to foreign countries.  

He doesn't understand Adam Smith's basic concept of keeping money flowing within an economic system.  Destroy America by flushing all money out of the American system.  

Thomas Friedman is a cancer.

Consider the time and space between Adam Smith's work in The Wealth of Nations in the 18th century (1776) and Thomas Friedman's work in the 21st century. In fact what Adam Smith wrote about in that time is still valid and widely accepted as the basis for any economic system. Thomas Friedman is just articulating the same economic principles used by Adam Smith in 1776, but in this case, instead of using the nation and what is within it as the basis for economic and wealth creation, the global arena is the plot. Even though nation-states are still the principal actors in this time and space, their relationships between each other has been dramatically altered by technological changes since 1776 during the advent of the industrial revolution to the present time where information and technological revolution is underway spanning all continents. If you ask me, I think the two authors are mutually inclusive in their basic tenets of economic understanding and wealth creation. The only difference is where they reside in a time and space continuum and of course by their chosen careers, Adam Smith being an economist and Thomas Friedman as a reporter/journalist.

Indian IT people live in tents, Bombay is a sespool, the $2.50 an hour we are paying them amounts to slavery, we found a legal way to enslave people by working with corrupt govrenments

NqoLhY comment6 ,

If ifs and buts were fruits and nuts, everyday would be Christmas............

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):