Jon Stewart disses, really disses CNBC - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Jon Stewart disses, really disses CNBC

Posted Mar 05 2009, 11:00 AM by Charley Blaine
Rating:

Hell hath no fury . . . like a comedian ignored.

David Letterman hit Sen. John McCain night after night during last fall's presidential campaign after McCain cancelled an appearance -- when he was in New York.

But that pales in comparison to The Daily Show's Jon Stewart.

Stewart, host of the hit Comedy Central show, makes no secret of his political and economic sympathies, but he likes bringing on guests with different perspectives than his own.

But when CNBC's Rick Santelli, he of the Santelli Rant, cancelled an appearance to explain his now-famous opposition to the Obama administration's mortgage rescue plan, Stewart replied and then some.

 

Why Santelli cancelled was a bit murky. The Washington Post suggested it was because Santelli has found himself embroiled in an Internet controversy over the origin of his rant, with some bloggers accusing him of being the frontman for a GOP-funded attack on Obama, which Santelli denied in this posting on CNBC.

Whatever. The result of the Daily Show's annoyance is an 8-minute, 29-second segment -- more than a third of the show.

Stewart starts with Santelli's rant. Then, he follows up with a greatest hits parade of clips of  wrong predictions, bad conclusions and stupid interviews on CNBC.

There's the Jim Cramer assertion that "Bear Stearns is fine" on March 11, 2008. Bear Stearns failed six days later. 

There was Cramer's assertion that one has to accept that stocks are "just going to go higher." That came on Oct. 31, 2007, the day the Nasdaq Composite peaked and the Dow finished at 13,930.

And the Larry Kudlow assertion on April 16, 2008 that the "worst of this subprime business" was over. The Dow finished at 12,743.

And Cramer's June 1, 2008 declaration that the market had bottomed and it was time to "buy, buy buy!" The Dow as at 12,307.

And Guy Adami, a regular on CNBC's Fast Money show, who said on Nov. 4 that the "fundamentals are coming back. People are starting to get confident." The Dow closed at 9,625.

The Dow was at 6,653 at 12:50 p.m. today 

"If I'd only followed CNBC's advice," Stewart deadpanned, "I'd have a million dollars today. . . . Provided I'd started with a hundred million dollars."

The segment ended with Carl Quintanilla's interview with Allen Stanford of the Stanford Group, which the government says defauded investors of at least $8 billion. The interview ended with Quintanilla asking if "it's fun being a billionaire." Stanford says "Yes."

"Between the two of them," Stewart said, "I can't make up mind which one of those guys I'd rather see in jail."

The Stewart segment was moving very quickly around the blogosphere today.

"That sound you hear today is the popping of champagne corks at Fox Business headquarters," Portfolio.com's Jeff Bercovici opined.

But the Business and Media Institute wasn't impressed, saying "the goons at Comedy Central had sharpened their knives and cut into Santelli."

CNBC spokesman Brian Steel said the network would have no comment.

Years ago, Barry Ritholtz, who runs The Big Picture blog, reminded his readers, "the expression was 'Never pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel” (meaning newspapers). The modern, updated version is 'Never pick a fight with people who have ascerbic, award winning comedy writers, a broad TV reach, and a strong internet presence.'"

Ritholtz closed his item with, "I would love to be a fly on the wall in whatever PR meeting (at CNBC) takes place about this today."

Additional reading: Market batters Cramer -- no wonder he's mad

Comments

 

How long will it be for Bush administration and the Republicans over the last 8 years to take ownership for the mess we are in RIGHT NOW.

why should Obama take the blame for the actions of AIG, Bank of America, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill ??? and 8 years of Bush spending

He's been in office since January. Give the guy a chance

when will the democrats stop the campaine, it is over lets just understan one thing so far no matter if you like who is in the white house or not Obama's has no one who matters buying in on his plan. he starts one thing and when he does not get the response he wants he moves on!

Obama/Biden have no more clue how to get us out of this mess than Bush/Cheney had how they got us into it.  At least Stewart makes me laugh.

"How long will it be for the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress tol take ownership for the policies implemented in the last 45 days?  How long will it be for the media to tag ownership and blame on the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress for failing to take the proper actions?"

what i don't understand DHC is why worry? with the Balanced Budget Amendment that the pubs promised back in 1996 if they were re-elected......oh wait....they lied ...i forgot....

I think it's important to understand that the media has enormous bias, CNBC is a cheerleading section for Wall Street, we all gleefully tapped our houses to buy stuff we didn't need, and now that things are going to hell in a handbasket, we can neither trust the experts (who helped get us there) nor their watchdogs (who helped get us there) and the only fellow left that we do trust is wearing clown shoes and fiddling while Rome burns.

All are guilty, and your 401K is what you spent buying that new Sport Utility vehicle when your old car had plenty of life left.

Enjoy.

Jon Stewart is right on!!!!  These money people are full of it.  Keep up the great work Jon!!!

the problem is congress related more than a presidential problem. it started with MR.CLINTON  directing freddie and fannie to make loans to people who couldn't afford them. Mr Bush was too focused on the war to notice the severity of the problem.Mr. Obama and his cronies are in way over their heads...They just don't get it.

Anyone can sift the glaring mistakes out of weeks and weeks of content and make pretty much any point desired.  That being said, Stewart has a very valid point, these individuals, held up to us as "experts" on the subject of investing and economics, have been very publicly very wrong about this for a very long time.  The system runs on money invested in the market and these people are inside of that environment, so part of it is not seeing the forest for the trees, part of of it is that up until the slide/crash/whathaveyou the contrarians were treated as interesting but quaint and out of touch.  Cramer's the vaudeville version of an economist - no doubt he knows his stuff, but he's there more for entertainment than information.

Hey Bob! if you're a Republican and you make a statement like this "But then again, the Clinton years taught many on the left how to bring the guns to bear in suppport of the "politics of personal destruction". Pretty small people who speak for the left" then it goes to show how narrow-minded, blind and irresponsible you are. No one does those personal vendetta attacks than the Republicans. Just ask Carl Rove, the mother of all dirty tricks, personal attacks and false accusations. He focused the nation on abortion and gun control while the economy burned under the watchful eye of the Republicans. What a buffoon you are.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):