Wells Fargo cancels ritzy Las Vegas retreat - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Wells Fargo cancels ritzy Las Vegas retreat

Posted Feb 04 2009, 06:59 AM by Kim Peterson
Rating:

Why don't banks hold executive retreats at someplace like the Hyatt Regency Wichita? I'm sure Wichita, Kan., is a beautiful place, and holds none of the indulgent excess of, say, 12 nights at the Wynn Casino in Las Vegas.

The Wynn is where Wells Fargo (WFC) had booked rooms for a dozen nights to reward its top employees and their guests. But after suffering intense criticism for the move -- Wells Fargo did get $25 billion in taxpayer money, after all -- the company abruptly canceled the event Tuesday.

At first, Wells Fargo defended the junket as an annual tradition. Previous trips have included private Jimmy Buffett concerts, horseback riding, wine tasting and gifts laid on pillows, The Associated Press reports. But as time went by, Wells found it harder to justify the expense.

So once again we witness a culture clash between Wall Street and the real world. Banks like Merrill Lynch have been pummeled for awarding huge bonuses to employees at a time when the taxpayers are bailing out the sector. Citigroup (C) was loudly criticized for ordering a $50 million luxury jet for executive travel.

And they give the same chorus of response when asked about it: This is just the way things are done. Top executives get rewarded for bringing the company business. Bonuses are a way of life, an incentive that helps a worker make more money for the company. All-expense-paid casino trips would have never made the headlines before the bailouts.

But the bailouts are a reality, and taxpayers are suddenly paying attention to how banks and other companies spend their money. Lavish corporate retreats are out, as are lavish jets. Anything that even seems remotely excessive is off-limits -- even if the companies argue that no bailout money is being used to pay the bills.

It's a new world for bailout companies, and employees who have grown accustomed to splashy corporate perks cannot be happy about that. 

Related reading:

Obama squashes Citigroup's $50 million luxury jet

AIG cancels pedicures for now

Comments

 

I am stunned that the PR reps for these financial companies never thought to tell them, hey maybe you should curtail perks since essentially you are now owned by tax payers.  And we all know that as soon as the spotlight leaves the banking sector the lavish spending will begin again.  Nothing changes but time.  

I heard on the news this morning that CitiBank is paying $40,000,000. for their name on some building.  I didn't catch the city but I am upset they can be so inept with my money and yours.  Ya know, when I borrow money, I have to disclose a lot of info such as "where I am going to spend it". Also, why is it that the media is finding out all this excessive waste?  Wouldn't you think the "keeper of the funds" would be checking that out?  Idea!!!!  Let's hire common folks to keep an eye on their spending.  We could put a whole lot of good folks to work and... keep a better eye on the big spenders.

AS A SMALL BUISNESS OWNER WHO HAS TO WATCH EVERY PENNY HOW CAN A COMPANY SAY IT IS REWARDING A GOOD JOB WHEN IT IS LOOSING MONEY

1099 the participants..no one would show up!

I am glad something got Wells to do something that made sense.  They certainly don't run their banking operation with good sense.  Their entire banking operation is based on the theory that 'wedgits" amount to relationship with customers.  The culture is driven by Measurement and Reporting department and the employees ethics are driven by the incentive compensation plan.  Customers are just a nuisance to has to be tolerated to make the wedgit goals.

don't forget that wells fargo declined the bailout money initially, but took it after the gov't told told them it would be better for the struggling banks, and there wasn't such a stigma attached to it.  They also have paid a dividend on the money, and reported a 3 billion dollar profit in 2008.  Why doesn't either article mention that?

So, let me get this straight, if you are a top executive and your company is in financial distress and at the brink of bankruptcy and you need tax-payer money to keep the business going, you can expect-and get- a raise and/or a bonus for doing a lousy job. Furthermore, the people who handle tax-payer money, will give it to you without any stipulations... May I have the four-digit code to this ATM machine?

Let them talke their junket--after they pay back the $25B to the American taxpayer---with 10% interest.  Have a nice trip!

Didn't Paulson force Wells Fargo to take the bailout money?

What a turn around by Wells Fargo. Yesterday they defended their junket and pretty much defied anyone to tell them how to run their business or what culture to they should operate under. Now, all bets are off. What a bunch of spineless cowards! If they were really smart, they would have perceived from the onset the public outcry raised about any excessive corporate expenditures and either shelved the junket themselves before receiving sharp criticism from all angles or had each attending executive sign a confidentiality agreement not to discuss the junket. That's how Wall Street does things.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):