Bush bails out Detroit - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Bush bails out Detroit

Posted Dec 19 2008, 11:49 AM by Minyanville
Rating:

The holidays just got a bit brighter for Detroit.

This morning, President Bush authorized up to $17.4 billion in loans to rescue General Motors and Chrysler from imminent collapse. The two troubled automakers had asserted they'd run out of money by year's end without government assistance.

According to Bloomberg, the bailout money, which will come from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, will provide a three-month window for the two firms to devise a restructuring plan to ensure their long-term viability. At the end of March 2009, the loans are callable if the government doesn't feel its demands have been met, forcing GM and Chrysler to immediately pay the money back.

Ford, which said it didn't need an emergency loan, wasn't included in the proposal.

In exchange for the cash, the government will receive warrants on non-voting stock, in addition to the right to block transactions of $100 million or more. Both companies must limit executive pay, give lawmakers access to their financial records, and are barred from issuing dividends until the debt is repaid. Debt must be slashed by two-thirds.

Detroit's powerful union lobby, the United Auto Workers, accepted concessions on retirement contributions and payouts for downtime.

Bush, in saving the U.S. auto industry at a time when the economy can ill-afford further job losses, told CNN "I have abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system."

Rumors swirled in recent weeks about the possibility of an "orderly bankruptcy," after Congress failed to agree on terms for a bailout. The President said this morning that allowing the carmakers to collapse, given the ongoing financial turmoil and recession, would "not be a responsible course of action."

Evaluating the relative success of the industry's turnaround plans will largely be left up to the incoming Obama administration. The Wall Street Journal reports metrics for determining the firms' financial viability are "relatively lenient." And though the agreement doesn't specificaly refer to a so-called "car czar," it does say the government must put someone in charge of ensuring the terms of the bailout are being met.

After months of pleading for money, GM CEO Rick Wagoner and Chrysler boss Robert Nardelli can finally return to Detroit with their pockets bulging. Payrolls can be met, vendors paid, and the books closed in January without a visit to bankruptcy court.

However, for two firms that seem inordinately adept at losing money -- and lots of it -- one would be hard-pressed to find too many people surprised if, before March, Wagoner and Nardelli are back on Capitol Hill explaining why they deserve a second chance.

Top Stocks blogging partner Todd Harrison is founder & CEO of Minyanville.com. This post was written by Minyanville Contributor Andrew Jeffery.

Related reading:

Car Czar, Treasury Could Force Automaker Bankruptcy

White House Bails Out Auto Bailout

Auto Bailout Still Has to Get Past Senate

Comments

 

So ... during decades of falling market share it never dawned on the Big Three that they needed to restructure labor contracts, reduce their overcapacity in factories and franchises, and actually manufacture vehicles people wanted to buy?  Now, with the inspiration of George W. Hoover and the clowns in Congress, they will get this done in three months!  It's a Christmas miracle!  

Come on people ... we all know that in three months, the Big Three CEOs will drive their token hybrids to DC again and spout some rhetoric about how bright the future is ... if only Congress can come up with another $15, or $34, or $112 Billion ... just a loan to give them time to develop their flying hybrids you understand.

Are you happy with where your taxes are going?  Are you happy that, despite the fact that 66% of the American public opposed ANY auto bailout, Congress and the President did it anyway?  Can Senators and Representatives be removed from office through a recall vote?  Anyone have a petition I can sign?

Bob, the Big 3 never looked at their business plan much beyond short-term. The morons on the boards structured the fat cats with very short sighted incentive plans. The board memebers are the idiots that always seem to be left out when it comes to pointing fingers. But the board dorks gave away huge bonus and option packages based on short-term goals. And the over compensated execs had enough gold in their parachutes to buy cozy little islands and sip pina colotas while they laugh at the rest of America until they burst from their gluttony. So why worry about paying ridiculous wages to unskilled union stiffs when you can pass that cost onto the consumer. Guess now is the time to worry about that since thay can't continue to pass the extra cost onto the consumer because no ones buying thier junky cars anymore.

MATT... what do you figure those geniuses are saying now? "Ooops"

I take great exception to every report that the Big 3 are receiving a "Bail-out",

Ford IS NOT receiving any of this money and only was requesting a line of credit, probably due to the fact that most of the banks are practically bankrupt and not lending money at reasonable rates except for mortgages that most people can't qualify for.

Then lets see, roughly,  GM has 24%, FORD has 15%, and Chrysler has 11% of the total US car market.. that's 50%.. I guess half of American's DO want to buy their cars.

Well, There is one thing that has become apparent. For years and years, I tried to tell my peers that a United Auto Worker voting for a Republican is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders. After 30 years, I think they've gotten the point.

Bush will do as much damage to USA as he can. A war we were lied to justify 3 trillion was a start and bailouts followed. Wmen will it end. Would you give money to a beggar who wears a tux and top hat as says he is bankrupt? Down to your last billion is not bankrupt. Those will starve and freeze whle CEO's milk taxpayers should gather in Washing ton to protest.

OK.  They got the cash.  Huge reward for a thirty + year spiral into near oblivion.

Lousy transmissions, peeling paint, and a host of "also rans" in the poor reliability department.  Yet, we are America!  Save US!  Save our Union workers, they have set a proud precedent for high  wages and exhorbitant benefits.  We have advertised and admitted we have dropped the ball.  But, now, with little defined to change their ways (oh, yea, they are cutting back on research and development) we are supposed to believe the cash is a panacea.  Tell me now, so I can budget for April, how much more you'll need then.  

What is the CAFE for 2008 ? I cannot find it in the Internet... what is the plan for cafe in 2009 and beyond? I want to know so I can gauge whether Big Oil will profit from it or not...  BTW, have all of you dumped Big Oil stocks lately?? Better start doing it now!

Big Oil Must Be Doomed in the years ahead!   Sell Big Oil stocks now!   Will the Car Czar be able to dictate how many 35 mpg cars must be made , if so, how will they make profits?   Or will Car Czar go easy on more crossovers and end up bringingback high oil prices???  Cross overs are still gas guzzlers, right? NO? Whynot?? YOu think 19 mpg is fuel efficient???  Why is nobody talking about 19 mpg as a new standard for gas guzzling?? It used to be 6, 13 , then now 19? right?? Should we continue to build crossovers ?? Should Japan be allowed to sell crossovers ??? It is our oil not Japan's...  Should we allow priviliged snots keep on buying gas guzzlers than deliver 19 mpg??? Is 19 mpg already too low?? Should it be 27 mpg city/highway crossovers or 31 mpg crossovers/? with more lightwieght materials and smaller engines for crossovers ??  Should all cars be of similar weight so to make everyone safe equally?? Why should I be hit andcrashedto death by heavy crossovers?? We are in rush to give a bailout to Big Three without saying what theyt got to make>...  Should crossovers be discontiinued and stop worriying about profitless 35 mpg cars because a lot of them will save us a lot more money with much lower oil prices than what we will have to keep giving Big Three bailout money every quarter to keep making those money loser fuel efficient modles that can deliver 35 mpg.. We will be ahead helping Big Three abosrobing losses on35 mpg with bailout checks because we will pay a lot less on gasoline prices that will stay stuck at $1.50 much longer... If we worry about Big Three profits and allow them to make enough profitable crossovers 19 mpg to keep them viable, then we will see oil prices go up much sooner..l We will pay much more to Big Oil and their profit coffers than paying Big Three and their small losses on 35 mpg cars.    Are we really good with numbers or what???   Think!!  Scenarios change with different decisions.. If we go there or there or there,  things changes... We can predict with certainity which avenu is better.. I think it is better to save Big Three than to entertain Big Oil and their shareholders with dividends..... You see my point or what/??  

Big Oil and shareholders are eerily silent as far as Big Three bailouts and issues is concerned... I bet that Big Oil shareolders are busy calculating how soon oil prices will go up again with crossovers still built by Big Three ... Big Three probably cannot make money on 35 mpg cars that we must buy and drive so to keep oil prices down for a really long time.. Are you willingto allow those rich snots continue to buy 19 mpg crossovers because they are not a bit concerned about the oil prices in the future.. Are we going to respect their claims that it is a liberty to choose any kind of car they damn please???  Our Founding Fathers never heard of petroleum back in 1776 as they wrote Bill of Rights...  We are living in a Petroleum Age and we got to stop kidding ourselves with those phony civil lessons!!! Screw the rich snots and start enjoying watching them crumple into 35 mpg cars and drive! Yeaaaaaaaahhh!

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):