White House bails out auto bailout - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

White House bails out auto bailout

Posted Dec 15 2008, 01:06 PM by Minyanville
Rating:

Bailouts are now being bailed out.

After the Senate failed to agree on terms for the rescue of General Motors and Chrysler, Detroit asked the Bush Administration to jump in and play savior. Over the weekend, White House officials pored over the two automakers' books, trying to figure out how much cash the Treasury Department would need to cough up to keep them alive.

According to the Wall Street Journal, estimates for the total amount vary from $10 billion to as much as $40 billion, but no one can seem to agree on how best to spend the money -- any of it. GM, Chrysler and Ford have been asking for money for months, to no avail. Ford, for it's part, claims it doesn't need an emergency loan -- but still likes to remind lawmakers just how bad things would get if GM or Chrysler were to fail.

Since the $25 billion allocated earlier in the year for renewable energy investments appears too politically costly to touch, the money has to come from somewhere. While Congress, the United Auto Workers, and the Big Three's top brass slog it out on Capitol Hill over the terms of a potential bailout, bean counters are scurrying around Washington scrounging up the cash. That's a tall order, since all but a paltry $15 or so billion is left of the first tranche of the $700 billion financial system bailout.

If Treasury wants to tap TARP, it needs to ask Congress to release the rest of the money. And if there were ever a day to keep the television locked on C-SPAN, this will be it. Watching irate senators and appalled members of the House rail at Treasury Department officials and their smug Federal Reserve cohorts who've begging for more money like spoiled teenagers asking for bigger allowances would be better than even the best reality TV.

Access to the money, however, would require plans for a host of prickly topics, such foreclosure prevention and federal aid to struggling municipalities. The immediacy of the problem -- GM and Chrysler both say they won't make 2009 without a cash infusion -- eliminates the possibility of designing programs to effectively use the rest of the bailout money.

The Fed, up to this point, has been reluctant to get involved. Chairman Ben Bernanke claims car-makers are outside his realm, and that the Fed doesn't want to overstep its bounds. Such a claim borders on the absurd, since Bernanke's stated vision is to protect the economy by any means necessary. His supposed fear of politicizing the "apolitical" Fed is akin to closing the barn door a few months after the horses left.

In previous government-sponsored bailouts, such as AIG and Citigroup, taxpayers received warrants for ownership of the companies the government deemed worthy of propping up. Now that state-owned companies are bleeding into the broader economy, the Great American Socialist Experiment can finally begin in earnest.

Top Stocks blogging partner Todd Harrison is founder & CEO of Minyanville.com. This post was written by Minyanville Contributor Andrew Jeffery.

Related reading:

Obama's New Deal

Auto Bailout Still Has To Get Past Senate

Big Three Cut Out Middleman, Just Ask You For Money

Comments

 

Hey Not-So-Smart Pam:  Honda, Toyota, and Nissan all assembled in the US now.

BTW:  Your caps-clokc key is on.  Turn it off.

Give them at least one chance.  Will they reform?  Maybe not, but then they will be totally responsible for their own demise.  People are mad about the bailouts.  There will be no more seconds.

Hey Pam,

Have you checked the quality difference between the offshore auto  makers and the american car companies. The americans need to get their act together. I am a diehard Ford person, but my last truck is terrible in quality. I have yet to hear a single complaint about a Toyota pickup. I will consider one if they start making a one ton. Why should MY TAX DOLLARS pay for someone to sit on their rear and do nothing to collect a wage because they have no work. The uinons have almost crippled the American auto industry with their greed. By the way, most foreign autos sold in the US are made in the US. Look on the VIN tag. They just have a different idea of quality. I thought America was built on the idea that if you can not operate your business in a profitable manner you went belly up and let someone who could take it over. Why didn't we bail out Studebaker or Hudson or any of the other hunred car makers that have folded over the years. If people dont like your cars and quit buying them YOU GO OUT OF BUSINESS and should not get a government handout. If the big three go bankrupt people not quit buying cars because they cant get a Ford, Chev, or Chrysler. They like I will buy the best truck or car for the money, but I am tired of paying for overpriced autos because some CEO has to make 26 million a year, and the auto unions are adding untold millions because of all the benifits that most working americans can only dream of. LET THEM GO BELLY UP.

It doesn't matter IF they get any $ because they are GOING to fail anyway.

Fact: GM and CHRYSLER have had more than ample time to get their act together but still have not.

Do you know why Mercedes sold off Chrysler at a substantial loss to private equity???   because they couldn't make a profit!

If a company like DAIMLER can't figure out how to make it work then how can a former CEO from Home Depot make it work? He can't and GM can't because of the high legacy costs from more than 50 years of unreasonable union contracts.

The truth is that the demise of the automotive industry is the fault of the leadership of the auto companies and the self-interest of the UAW to protect benefits that cannot be found in the modern industrial world.

The best way to protect the auto industry is to let it go insolvent, reorganize under a chapter 11 bankruptcy, and break the death grip the UAW has on the industry.

Sorry UAW workers. Looks like you'll need to reskill and re-educate in a new economy like everybody else. If you thought you had a bright future in manufacturing, then you must have been a sleep for the past twenty years as manufacturing declined and jobs were outsourced overseas.  

Maybe next time you'll pay attention.

So when did $15B dollars become a paltry sum of money. I have also heard our politicians stating that the $34B originally asked for was no more than a rounding error. Don't know about you, but I can certainly see how these arrogant jerks don’t value our tax payer money.

For decades the UAW and the execs were making way more than they were worth. The big 3 made huge profits as the excess compensation was passed to the conumer like a tax. The consumer didn't have a choice and had to pay more for the car than it was worth. This strategy worked well until the 80s and more and more Americans started buy Hondas and Toyotas. As time went on the burden of over compensation and the tough competition from the japs have crushed the Big 3. The union has it's head up it's exit hole and can't seem to grasp the reality of the situation. They continue to negotiate as if the hostage has the upperhand.  The moron union workers believe that they are being paid what they are worth. It's a fairy tail that is about to have a very unhappy ending.

Hey Claude, Pam is a moron. She's like the UAW, totally clueless.

You tell him Pam! First of all Roy, Fords quality is just as good as Toyotas. If you want to take away good manufacturing jobs then be a traitor and buy a foreign car and what is $1,000 going to do. What a loser this guy is!

My American Car was made in Canada. Does that make it foreign. I am sure all those french speaking autoworkers on that assembly line didn't give a damn if it was a Gm or Honda they were putting together. Fact is they made it and shipped it to another country. I feel no more Canadian than I do Japanese!

Just have to wonder how much of the auto industry bailout money went into the UAW pension fund and the GM, Ford, Chrysler Pension Plan and Trusts?  The funds were underfunded to begin with and with most defined benefit plans suffering 20-50% losses in assets, the PPA2006 mandates huge cash infusions.  Where does the new cash come from?  If they are not selling cars, then guess what?  I really liked  Roy's idea (the first blog above) of giving funds directly to the consumer.  Instead of direct cash from the fed how about a tax credit based on a percentage of the MSRP?

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):