Markets crash on auto blowout - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Markets crash on auto blowout

Posted Dec 12 2008, 06:12 AM by Bernhard Warner and Matthew Yeomans
Rating:

This post comes from partner site The Big Money. 

So much for a speedy bailout. The $14 billion emergency financing deal for General Motors and Chrysler ran out of gas on the floor of the Senate Thursday night, raising, as the New York Times writes, "a specter of financial collapse" for the troubled automakers.

The deal's derailment, continues Business Week, creates "the real possibility that General Motors and Chrysler will face bankruptcy in a matter of weeks, unless the Treasury Dept. acts to prevent it." In any event, lawmakers will likely not take up the matter of an auto bailout again until January, and who knows then what shape two of the Big 3 will be in. "It's over with," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told the Wall Street Journal. The automakers, though, are still holding out hope that the White House will relent and hive off some of the $700 billion TARP fund to keep them afloat for the time being, the newspaper adds.

Why did the deal fail? It came down to pay cuts, Business Week says. United Auto Workers, headed by Ron Gettelfinger, would not budge on a deal to lower union wages and benefits to the level paid to workers at Toyota and Honda by next year. That was the deal-killer, the magazine writes. Amid the finger-pointing, Reid was looking ahead, reluctantly. "I dread looking at Wall Street tomorrow. It's not going to be a pleasant sight," he commented.

Reid's words are ringing true -- cue the sell-off in the Asian markets. According to the WSJ, Japan's Nikkei, Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index, China's Shanghai Composite, plus markets in South Korea, Australia and Singapore all took a nose dive on the news this morning. Europe also plunged in early trading. The dollar fell, tumbling to a 13-year low against the yen, Bloomberg reports. Asian market analysts were seething.

"Investors have been betrayed again by U.S. politicians," growled Yasuhiro Miyata, who helps manage about $109 billion at DIAM Co. in Tokyo.

Back to the banking beat, where Bank of America is plotting to slash 35,000 positions over the next three years as it prepares for the merger with Merrill Lynch. The job cuts would amount to 10% to 11% of the companies' combined work forces, the WSJ writes, and they would come from all areas of the business. The staggering job cuts figure puts BofA in good company. According to the Guardian, Bank of America "joined Citigroup, Credit Suisse and UBS in preparing to axe thousands from its payroll, citing the economic downturn and a $50bn merger with Merrill Lynch as reasons for the move."

Wall Street will be further rocked this morning by details of the fall of the trading house of Madoff. In what the WSJ calls a "giant Ponzi scheme," legendary trader Bernard L. Madoff, a former chairman of Nasdaq, was arrested for running an securities advisory business that duped investors out of $50 billion.

Andrew M. Calamari, associate director of enforcement in the SEC's New York office described Madoff's alleged swindle as "a stunning fraud that appears to be of epic proportions." Still on the white-collar crime beat, the WSJ also reports on the case of a Florida mortgage securities executive who "used little more than a pen to alter credit scores and reclassify mobile homes as single-family houses, inflating the value of thousands of mortgages that were [then] repackaged and sold to investors." Steven Gordon allegedly made more than $2.8 million in additional commissions by upgrading the value of 2,800 loans over a five-year period. With federal investigators beginning to delve deeper into the murky world of mortgage securities, this case "offers a snapshot of the ease with which some mortgage-backed securities became tainted," writes the WSJ.

A bit of good news for businesses already struggling to meet the bottom line. The NYT writes that "companies whose pension funds suffered big losses this year will not have to replenish the money quickly under a relief measure that flew through the Senate Thursday." Ordinarily the companies would be forced to make up the shortfall -- something they haven't had to budget for in recent years because of strong market performances. The measure, which is expected to be quickly signed into law by the White House, also "offers relief to people over the age of 70 who would normally be required to withdraw money from their 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts or face big penalties," writes the NYT.

With the markets already tanking in Asia and Europe, today no doubt will be a good day for stock-market watchers to play a new kind of numbers game: what BusinessWeek calls "going to zero," or predicting which equities will fall below a penny. According to BusinessWeek, "zero" ratings by Wall Street analysts are proliferating. They include companies big and small including General Motors, Nortel Networks, RBC Capital Markets, and Sirius XM. And the number of "zeroes" is growing. "Analysts at Morningstar say the shares of 32 of the 2,000 companies they cover are likely to become worthless," BusinessWeek writes.

Related in The Big Money: Oil Sand Castles: Canada's elusive quest for energy wealth; iPhone Speed Demons: Is the iPhone as fast as its ad suggests?; Bailout Watch: An interactive cheat sheet on the trillions of dollars in federal rescue packages.

 

Comments

 

Let them go under!  Maybe then they will re-organize WITHOUT being under the stranglehold of the unions, and we can start producing cars as good as honda and Toyota.

What is wrong with the UAW?  Why don't they let the workers them selves vote on the pay cuts instead of one person decide for everyone?  If I was in the UAW I would have voted to take the cut to SAVE MY JOB AND MY FAMILIES SECURTIY!!  I have said all along that the UNIONS ARE GONNA BE THE DOWN FALL OF THE REST OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY!  I DON'T CARE WHAT ANYONE SAYS THE UNIONS ARE THE DOWN FALL FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN JOBS!!!!  THEY ARE JUST AS BAD IF NOT WORSE THAN THE GREEDY CEO'S IN CORPRATE AMERICA.  THEY SHOULD ALL BE DONE AWAY WITH AND ALL NEW WAYS IMPLEMENTED IN PLACE OF THEM.  THIS GOES TO SHOW YOU JUST HOW GREEDY PEOPLE HAVE BE COME.

What a sorry society that we live in which would literally hand $700 Billion to an industry which has NO products, produces relatively few jobs (other than Mega-Million dollar CEOS) , with absolutely NO strings attached, but will not expend one penny in LOANS to an industry which actually contributes to our Gross National product, creates millions of jobs, and is a keystone in our economy. The $14 billion loan package which fell thruogh was a mere 2% of the gift we handed to the financial institutes.

This emphatically displays the disdain and contempt that our leaders harbor to working class people and middle America.Of course, any loan to the Big Three should have included oversight-but not micro-management. The effects of no oversight was apparent whenever the AIG officials threw a big party at taxpayer expense before the ink was dried on their first "welfare" check from we taxpayers.

If we are to regain some sembelence of economic stability in our nation, we had better concern ourselves with helping struggling industries which contribute to our society in the form of actual tangible products, real jobs, and taxpaying employees.

It is apparent that the "paper"/"plastic" based economy which is the direction our leadership has been guiding us into doesn't work, because there is no real value to paper/plastic. It is simply a pyramid scheme, destined to fail. We need industry and products to ragain our position in the global economy.

I'm not sure what an auto worker makes per hour but the subject of hourly pay has always been an issue in our economy. Let's say for example that everything was the same except there was no UAW.

How much per hour do you think an auto worker would be paid ? If Ford, GM and Chrysler could get away with it, they would pay people $8 bucks an hour and we would still be paying $30,000 and up for cars and trucks.

The issue seems to be who gets the money and it seems there's a modicum of resentment if an hourly worker makes say $25 per hour yet no one seems bothered by white collar workers who make 6 figure salaries. GM CEO Rick Wagoner made according to 2007 figures, $14,415,914  ! Now what does his pay costs GM per hour and more importantly is he worth it !

Unions were first organized as a way to correct horrible work conditions and pay for workers in the early 1900's, but have become what may be the downfall of corporate America. Union officials are overpaid and will continue to get paid no matter what happens to the laborers. They are no better than the big Corporate CEO's. Lets get back to the basics before stupidity and greed ruin what has been built.

Let em sink. The problem with our economy is too many workers and not enough consumers. I the big 3 go under we just might get 5-10 million new consumers; what effect would that have on the economy????

as an auto worker for one of the big 3...i would like to know where the numbers come from...we make maybe 4-6 dollars an hour more than toyota and honda workers, and i know our benifit packages are a little better...but with a base pay between $26-32/hr....where does the other $35/hr come from in some of the articles state that we are receiving?

The autos are being choked by the the unions just like the coal, steel &  railroad industries.

It was mentioned at one point the employees of the "Big 3", should also agree to lower their hourly rate and package re benefits to be comparable to the various Japanese manufacturers  who build their product in Canada and the U.S.

That certainly seems reasonable and fair.  Quite frankly, if the "Big 3" employees have made any concessions whatever, I'm not aware of it.  To expect the taxpayers to totally subsidize them without the unin workers also making realistic concessions doesn't give the taxpayer much "punch of the their tax dollars".  Even the executives of the Big 3 were expected to not receive any bonuses for a period of time.

Surely, a less paying job is better than NO JOB.  I think not doing this is expecting too much from the taxpayer.  Share the wealth in the good times and do likewise in the bad times.

The price of a new car today is absolutely outrageous.  Do you not think more people will be able to upgrade their vehicle more often this way - hence more sales and more work.

To ark "staying afloat" How are these 5-10 million consumers going to pay for things with out a job. These consumers are now keeping the USA afloat. Without a job the USA will sink.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):