Why interest rates are headed to 0% - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Why interest rates are headed to 0%

Posted Oct 31 2008, 04:56 AM by Anthony Mirhaydari
Rating:

Get ready for 0% interest rates. Here's why.

This week the Fed cut its target overnight interest rate to just 1% from 1.5%, but that won't end the problems our economy faces. Interest rates have returned to levels that started the epic final leg of the housing bubble in 2003 under Greenspan's watch. Before that, money hadn't been as cheap since the 1950s.

The problem is that the global economy's inflationary fever is quickly turning into a cold, deflationary sweat. In the words of my favorite Wall Street economist, David Rosenberg of Merrill Lynch, "deflationary forces are already in motion and look irreversible."

Deflation would be destructive: it makes debt harder to pay back, reduces demand, and leads to higher unemployment. What's worse, deflation is self-reinforcing. Faced with the dire consequences of inaction, the Fed will have no choice but to lower rates to historic levels. 

This intention was telegraphed in yesterday's official statement, in which the Fed noted that it "expects inflation to moderate" and that "downside risks to growth remain." At its September meeting, the Fed said the inflation outlook was "highly uncertain." A lot has changed over the last six weeks.

Stocks and commodities have yet to definitively bottom, layoffs are increasing dramatically, and the consumer is buckling in a big way under unprecedented pressure. Beneath Thursday's terrible GDP figures, we learned that overall consumer spending had its biggest decline since 1980. Spending on non-durable goods like food and clothes was off 6.4% -- the worst reading since 1950.

In comparison, with the cut to 1% back in 2003, the Fed signaled it was done. The recession had been over for 18 months, the commodity bonanza had already begun, and the stock market had bottomed seven months earlier.

So this downward leg isn't over yet. As I discussed in my last blog post, it doesn't look like the economic storm will end until June at the earliest. With inflation currently near 5%, Rosenberg believes the year-over-year inflation measure could move into "slight negative terrain" by the middle of next year -- something not seen in the United States since 1948-1949 and 1954-1955.

Now, for the really scary part: Cutting overnight interest rates to near 0% may still not do the trick. The problem relates to still high interbank lending rates, household deleveraging, and what economists call the "velocity of money."

Money velocity refers to how much work a single dollar can do in the economy -- how many hands it can touch. More consumer credit means that a dollar can do more work. More interbank lending means that a dollar can do more work. When velocity slows, as it is now, it effectively shrinks the number of dollars working through the economy. This is part of the reason interest rates on credit cards and mortgages remain high.

Thankfully, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke is an expert in the surprisingly simple solution to this complex problem: Print, spend, and lend lots and lots of money. The Federal Reserve, in just the last 13 weeks, has expanded its balance sheet at a 1,640% annual rate, to $18 trillion. Relative to GDP, it's still only half the size reached by the Bank of Japan during its fight against deflation.

Disclosure: I don’t own or control shares in any of the companies mentioned. I can be contacted at anthony.mirhaydari@live.com

Related reading:

Recession to end in June?

Who will end this bear market?

Exxon breaks US profit record 

Delta becomes the world's largest airline

Comments

 

Hi everyone,

Many of you are asking about the interest rates on mortgages and consumer loans. Both are determined by longer term (3 months and longer)  interest rates than those traditionally targeted by the Federal Reserve (overnight).

However, in a deflation scenario, Ben Bernanke has explicitly stated his belief that longer term interest rates should be targeted. You can check it out for yourself here:

www.federalreserve.gov/.../default.htm

If this happened, interest rates on mortgages and auto loans would surely fall. However, credit risk would probably still keep many from being able to access these new, lower cost loans.

Thanks for reading,

Anthony

Perry Cecchini....i hope you are being sarcastic....

Perry Cecchini...i hope you are being sarcastic...

I think that we all should worry about the health of our plane and not so much about how much money we hoard in the bank, Greed Will foreclose in our home planet soon if we keep this course. wake up.

B.O. in the White House..hmmm...smells like a bad idea.

This is why you people need to elect Barack Obama to solve your problems. He is an amazingly intelligent man, with wisdom to boot. That is rare in a politician. If you are lucky enough to elect him, I will say, for you, horrah!

-------------- End the 8 year Bush nightmare guys! Good luck from your neighbour..... in Canada!

Justin Time

I love the bloggers on MSN...the people at YM on the boards here would eat them alive in a financial conversation with ease. Statements like this:

"In comparison, with the cut to 1% back in 2003, the Fed signaled it was done. The recession had been over for 18 months, the commodity bonanza had already begun, and the stock market had bottomed seven months earlier."

It's obvious you just trusted your memory instead of perhaps looking just to make sure what you posted was "factual"

If you want to look at a chart, I'll give you time. The market bottomed in July 2002, only 9 months after the recession had "technically" ended, I say "technically" because the recession didn't end when GDP was no longer contracting and anyone who was in the working force then knows that.

Retests in October 2002, and March 2003 do not mark finding a bottom. Retests confirm a bottom was previously found and they are not the bottom themselves.

And not only that, the Fed had lowered interest rates to 1.75% by December of 2001, that was the "technical end" of their rate cutting cycle because the difference between 1% and 1.75% is almost insignificant, and they only cut rates 2 times in 2 years after that. The Fed rate cutting cycle started in January of 2001, I'd call going from 6.5% to 1.75% in a year the majority of their rate cutting efforts.

But if you want to stay in pretend land for your own measurements that's your business. The Fed always, always finishes the majority of its rate cuts before the market comes back.

Isn't cutting interest rates at this point in time just a band-aid to the problem?  With all the extra money supply the Fed is dumping into the economy, inflation is going to sky-rocket and the first fix for high inflation is guess what, raise interest rates.  We may see low interest rates for now, but they will be forced to raise them in the next year or so and if they have to be raised at the same rate they have been lowered, the margins for banks and other lenders made adjustaments based on these low rates are going to be squeezed to a point where they are back in trouble.

Justin, If you like B.O. so much, you can f#$%ing have him. Please, really, Take him.

B.O. = Barack Obama; B.O. = Body Odor....lol either way it still "smells" like a bad idea.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):