$50 billion of bailout going to employee bonuses - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

$50 billion of bailout going to employee bonuses

Posted Oct 31 2008, 07:30 AM by Andrew Horowitz
Rating:

As if the economic bailout by U.S. taxpayers isn't enough to make you sick to your stomach, new information has come to light that several banks are planning to pay billions of dollars in year-end bonuses from the bailout funds they received.  Investigations are beginning into the nine banks that took in the first $125 billion -- the same $125 billion that was supposed to be used to unclog the credit system which was preventing banks from providing much needed funds for individuals and businesses.

There are many feathers in a ruffle over this and New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo and several congressmen are furious that over $20 billion has already been earmarked as bonus funds for management and employees. Unbelievably, that is just the estimates from Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch. There are six more banks that are also working on similar heists.

Here is their rationale for using that money: It is reported that the financial industry pays base salaries in the range of $80,000 to $600,000 and apparently that is simply not enough to keep some of the best and brightest working to keep their companies profitable. It seems that if they were paid only this meager amount, the company would risk mass defections. That would be a real problem...or would it?

Maybe it is time to peg annual bonuses to something meaningful like profitability. As I recall, not only are these the firms that have been losing money (as is evident by the need for a massive multi-billion dollar bailout) but they have also been shown to be the creators of securitization, derivatives, sub-prime mortgages and other toxic credit that is the root cause of this historic global economic catastrophe!

Maybe I am being too harsh? Perhaps management is entitled to hundreds of millions in bonuses for the hard work they do, day in and day out. You have to feel sorry for them as most have had to give up their private jets and instead fly in a cramped seat in first class. Surely most will now have to wonder how they will deal with the excess workload as they have had to fire thousands of employees. Also, they will need to use a good chunk of that money to rebuild their retirement plans as much of their wealth was tied up in their company's stock which, under their leadership, could be down more than 60% just this year alone.

What do you think?

Related Reading:

Listen: TDI Podcast - Predicting another 40% down

Henry Waxman Requests for Bonus information

Wall Street banks in $70bln staff payout

Will Banks really need to curb CEO Pay?

$500 billion of 401k wealth is destroyed

Andrew Horowitz is a money manager and the founder of Horowitz & Company. He is also the author of the bestselling book, The Disciplined Investor . Check out his latest investment idea or listen in as he hosts, The Disciplined Investor Podcast.

 

 

Comments

 

Write, e-mail or call your Congressman. They are even bigger crooks!!!

Could you list the name of all those banks again so I can make sure I never buy their products! Thanks.

I SAY STONE THEM, BRING BACK BIBLE TIME PUNISHMENTS TO FIT THE CRIME,

STONE THEM ALL

Gee whiz....how do you expect these overpaid execs to pay their mortgages on their mansions on just $80,000 to $600,000 a year.  I think their bonuses are based on number of days showing up for work and number of executive conferences at super expensive resorts.

Now THAT sounds like a redistribution of wealth! Why is it that paying your fair share of taxes to keep roads repaired and schools educating is viewed as a give away to the lazy poor but $700 Billion to keep wealthy investors and institutions from loosing their shirts on foolish investments and ponzi schemes is viwed as necessary and good for the economY?

Pathetic!

In this situation, the rich will be richer and goverment will pay them to get richer and richer and richier, while the poor have to pay the richer so they can get richer ???? I like OBAMA better, please SPREAD the WEALTH because Republican is only for the rich people. We need CHANGE.

Try this!!! Not only should any bonus be tied to profit in the year, but some sort of a long term plan needs toc alculated the history of past and present yearly profit so if an employee jumps ship or has a bad year, that bonus (held for 5-7 years) is adjusted before release to reflect the history of the employee's total work history.... We need to get away from short term profits and short term greed. By the way, why am I paying for PNC buying National City? Is it the taxpayer's job to fund aquisitions and expansions without any benefits, yet taxpayers are taking all the risk with their tax dollars???

That is beyond outrageous!  How could our "government" not have specified that the bailout funds were not to be used for bonuses which, according to reason, would be for having done a GOOD job.  Sadly, I am not all that surprised that the fat cats get fatter while the disappearing middle class gets more destitute by the nanosecond.

I am not surprised at all.  Those low life scum bags never intended to put the money where it belonged and put a freeze on the bonuses.  This is why the government needs to watch dog the money that is going out and ensure they have in writing or something that these banks won't do exactly what they intended to do anyway.

I think it has been said that Marie Antoinette said "Let them eat cake." shortly before her head ended up detached from her body and in a basket. Revolutions are spawned from the same seeds of discontent that we are seeing now, brought on by aristocratic greed and disdain for the peasant masses (we poor taxpayers). I am glad that the supreme court upheld the second ammendment right of the citizens to keep and bear arms. We might need them to see that ultimately, justice is done.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):