Mutual fund companies are in peril - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Mutual fund companies are in peril

Posted Oct 24 2008, 03:15 PM by Andrew Horowitz
Rating:
Filed under: ,

How much confidence do you have in your mutual funds?  If you are like most, you are looking at your statements - at least the ones that you dare to open - differently than ever before. That is probably because you thought that you had a good level of diversification and had some built-in protection since a professional and experienced manager was watching over your portfolio.

That has all changed now and most investors are totally disgusted and thoroughly dissatisfied with the returns their hard working managers have provided. The problem is now more evident than ever for many of these fund companies and may deserve to be shorted. Here is why... 

You are not alone when you look at your portfolio of funds and wonder what happened. Investors are pulling money out of all types of funds at a record pace and mutual fund companies such as Legg Mason, T. Rowe Price Group, Janus, Alliance Bernstein and Franklin Resources are struggling and will continue to struggle on many different levels.  As investors have been withdrawing funds due to their dissatisfaction with performance, even the fund company's highest profit margins from money market funds has come under fire. In addition, competition in the form of low cost ETFs is also gaining strength as investors are looking for alternatives. (See "Mutual Fund Companies are Doomed" here)

Mutual Fund Performance

Most investors have voiced their disgust for their managers by withdrawing funds at a breakneck pace.  If we see this fleeing of assets happening in the market place, the question to be asked is: where are people putting their money?  Most investors are still too shell-shocked to be willing to place their hard earned cash back into the failing banking system.  If they were, we would see banks with stockpiles of cash ready and able to loan to consumers.  That has not occurred as we certainly have not seen any significant loosening of the clog within the credit markets.

Money is also not going to be put back into funds. It is going to be a long time until mutual fund managers and fund companies alike gain back the confidence of investors.  For too long, fund companies have been charging ridiculous amounts of money for the highly regarded "active management"  which has only provided sub-par results.

What was supposed to be a way to diversify has turned out to be nothing more than market returns in a terrible market. If you have been unfortunate enough to follow the wisdom of the buy-and-hold crowd and invested in any of the top 25 mutual funds by asset size, you have certainly seen some historic volatility within your portfolio.  Some of the best known managers of our time including Bill Miller of Legg Mason, Chris Davis of Selected American and Kenneth Heebner of CGM Funds, have suffered dramatically this year.  Frankly, looking at the year-to-date returns from these managers is absolutely appalling.

Sample of Funds as of 10/23/08
Legg Mason Value Trust (LMNVX)    YTD -51.70%
Selected American Shares Fund (SLADX)    YTD -38.19%
CGM Focus Fund (CGMFX)    YTD -45.93%
American Funds Europacific Growth Fund (AEGFX)    YTD -44.62%
American Funds Growth Fund of America (GFAFX)    YTD -38.74%
Fidelity Magellan Fund (FMAGX)    YTD -50.37%


Indices as of 10/23/08
S&P 500    YTD -37.07%
MSCI EAFE    YTD -45.14%
Morningstar Large Growth    YTD -39.91%
Morningstar Large Blend    YTD -32.89%
Morningstar Large Value    YTD -36.60%

These numbers consider the fact that you can purchase the institutional or no-load shares of these mutual funds.  If you have any other class such as A, B or C shares you are down even more.  This is important to consider because mutual fund companies make money from assets under management.  If assets are fleeing and the fund price is declining, then it seems very clear that earnings will suffer.

Money market funds have also been under fire as of late.  In fact, according to AMG Data Services, Money Market funds report net outflows totaling -$133.129 billion in September, the largest monthly net outflow from the sector on record. General Money Market funds report record net outflows as well of -$479.204 billion.

Concerns about the possibility of these funds breaking the $1 NAV have been somewhat hushed by government action when they initially guaranteed all money market mutual funds for those invested prior to September 18th.  There is still the possibility that funds may have difficulty going forward as commercial paper losses could be far greater than anticipated.

Now, the real concern is that the Fed is providing a total of $540 billion to help try to contain any problems for money market mutual funds. This money, which has everyone wondering how the Fed will replenish from its almost empty balance sheet, could potentially add to the problems of the fund companies. Many are already waiving their fees to maintain as much principal value as possible in order to hold up share value. Now, if this $540 billion requires companies to pay loan interest or other repayment, earnings may be further reduced. This is still a wildcard.

Another problem for funds is that competition from ETFs has become rather intense lately.  ETFs provide market exposure to almost any area that you can think of for a much cheaper cost.  Although these funds aren't "actively managed" they do effectively track the benchmark that they are being compared to.  ETFs don't have short term redemption fees, they allow you to trade intra-day and they provide the flexibility and low tracking error, all of which can be a powerful tool for any investor.

The final realization that fund companies are in trouble will be when 401k administrators take a look at their quarterly statements and hear an earful from the company employees that are suffering. If there is no legislative action that will occur, there will at least be a revolt lead by employees that want more alternatives to help reduce risk. Many of the fund companies will be forced to provide brokerage services or they will be at risk of losing accounts. Money will surely flow out of mutual fund accounts and into the brokerage side, further reducing earnings.

With all of this being said, mutual fund companies should continue to struggle due to lack of confidence in managers, increasing redemptions, commercial paper concerns and increasing competition.  Going forward we are not sure how investors will regain confidence with their beloved mutual fund managers, but our outlook is rather bleak.  We are seriously in doubt that active management from mutual fund companies added much value to a portfolio. It is time to question why our wealth managers and financial planners still trust several of these faulty mutual fund managers with our money. 

The bottom line: There should be a significant share loss for many of the companies in this sector as they will feel the pain of massive withdrawals as the year progresses and there isn't much they can do to prevent it.


Related Reading

Disclosure: Horowitz & Company clients may have short and/or long positions in securities mentioned as of the date of publish.

Andrew Horowitz is a money manager and the founder of Horowitz & Company. He is also the author of the bestselling book, The Disciplined Investor . Check out his latest investment idea or listen in as he hosts, The Disciplined Investor Podcast. Kevin Hoffman helped compile data for this article.

Comments

 

Becky:

the same thing was told to me by my advisor and I got rid of him. My new guy showed me how to protect my principal and invest with my yield b/c it is a renewable resource.

My heart goes out to people that are being fed lies and screwed. I was a victim and now I want as many people as possible to know that they don't have to be victims and they can control their money.

if you want to know how email me MattLemmond@gmail.com

A reckless fear-driven article that will only fuel the fire of investor bailout.  More ill-conceived Doomsday writing.  *yawn*

First, we need a clean sweep of Congress even though the new ones may have defects. It can't be as bad as it is now. Where were all our political lawmakers when this economic problem began to surface several months ago? I have lost a bundel in my "high quality" mutual funds including my grandchildren's college education fund.

hi Andrew,

The plan is to get the gov'ts so in debt they cry to form a World Central Bank, which like many of the Central banks now, wil be controlled by Jacob Rothchild from the shadows. Bush is told to work on that quickly.  Stay tuned.  The current Scenario: ACT I Greenspan was appointed to drop rates to sucker people into long term debt and build cc debt. ACT II to make it seem disassociated, he retired and they appointed Bernanke to raise rates to foreclose that debt by claiming he was fighting non existant inflation. Thus his masters stopped the housing boom, caused the defaults, resets and foreclosures. All foreseeable, as you would agree. Some worthwhile assets were driven into the hands of Rothchild banks: Chase and BofA. Then the forseeable counter party failures.  Lehamn was sacrificed because it had infected routes running through the entire system.  90 billion would have samed it, but 700 billion indebts us more. That will grow to 3-5 trillion soon. Just watch:you can plan this on a calculator. Then we'll cry out for a solution, a brand new World Central Bank, which will use their debt to, ultimately, to control all countries and their citizens. Why do yu think we've been earing so much global this and global that for the lat 10 years. Any country that fails to pay will be attacked, as the Holy Sea attacked Protestant countries in the middle ages. Same people run the show then as now, same template, same objective. Had nothing to do with religion then, just control, same now.      

Just a few years back we were all told we shouls invest are social security in mutal funs just like a 401k. I am 49 and have lost 40% of my 401k once valued  at 400,000.  62 was looking looking like a good retirement age, now I will be lucky to retire at 70. If I live that long . Oh and I payed an extra .6 % to have this 401K managed on top of what the fund managers got.

For those with brains: We have over 7000 banks in the U.S.A. Most banks are doing well.The only ones who are in trouble are the ones which  made high risk loans and high risk investments.Those are few compared with the 7000.DO NOT confuse Commercial banks with Investment banks and Mortgage banks,they are different animals.Again, most com'l banks are doing just fine.And that's where the safest place for cash is today and has always been.On top of that funds are guaranteed by FDIC.What more can anyone ask for.Go do the right thing!!

OK, that's a great idea.  Now lets all start day-trading ETFs.  Oops!  Almost forgot there's a commission to buy and sell those things, kind've like stocks.  

Well, some of those fund managers have outperformed for so long, that a few months of underperformance won't do much to tarnish their record.  I wonder if they'll come back faster.  

I sure have trouble with passive management.  I'm guaranteed to underperform the market by the costs associated with investing.  At least with active management I have the opportunity to outperform.  And, with the tools available today, it's not that difficult to figure out which managers have outperformed, with less risk, over long periods.  

I sold most of my Mutual Funds when the DOW was at 14000.  I bought the bulk of my Mutuals back in 1998 and they did very well for about 2 years, after the 2001 Correction they never did do much of anything.  When I sold them I got my money back with a very small gain, if I had held on to them I would have lost half of my principle money that I had invested back in 1998.  I should have treated the Mutuals like single stocks and went for the profit, but I listened to the term (Invest with Discipline) and barely got my money back not to mention the loss of investment time.  I will never invest in Mutuals again, unless the company promises a minumum gain each year of the princilple invested and is FDIC insured.

I am raising my hand, I pulled EVERYTHING (windfall savings) I had in wasax, ignax and couple others ivy funds on 10/9/08. My principle loss of $22,000 is a thing of the past, boo hoo. I am in staggered CDs and investing on my own with success, very small amounts of money to try to get my 22k back - I will never again seek help from an "advisor"

I pulled everything out of T Rowe Price funds I was in for my 401k and placed the balance in a  Money Market, not making alot but not losing alot - I can always get back in if I see any of those funds start to rebound

Now you see why Social Security was created.  For most who retire in the next 15  years, it will be the majority of their income.  The markets have failed as they always do - POOF! - there went your retirement funds.  They will not return for 10-20 years if ever.

Urge your congressman and senators to up the Social Security tax from 6.7% to 8% or 9%, increase the top income levels who pay into it, stop stealing from the fund, stop giving it to illegals and anyone else who didn't pay into it and make it safe and solvent.  It's the only thing we MIGHT be able to depend on.

Also urge them to allow you to withdrawal your 401k funds without the 10% penalty to pay off your home or to roll it over into an FDIC insured IRA.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):