Banks safe, economy burns
Posted
Oct 14 2008, 12:07 PM
by
Todd Harrison
Rating:
Being long a "systemically important bank" is akin to being one of Orwell's "Animals who are more equal than others." It's like Daddy Warbucks whipping around the munitions players to cash in on World War I. I feel filthy, dirty and otherwise disgusted. But I suppose that's better than feeling short, at least for the moment.
Some very quick thoughts, as I shake what little sleep I got out of my eyes:
-
Citigroup is being diluted in some way, on a massive scale and in a manner which, George W. assures me, is "temporary." If I were an actual "owner" of the stock I bought yesterday, that temporary part would concern me. As would my still entirely unclear level of dilution. I'm a trader. Citi is somewhere around $18 pre-market.
As Edie Brickell sang, "Philosophy is the smile on a dog."
-
I had an atypically difficult time not swearing like a sailor last night, describing and debating the "bailout" idea on the whole. I'm less concerned about the banks. Guaranteeing bank liquidity actually makes the banks worth more (assuming the aforementioned "dilution" isn't too onerous). Giving money to extremely important -- but not quite systemically important -- companies like
General Motors is a slippery slope to markets which don't ever bother to be free.
-
I trust the folks running this plan understand the difference between banks and autos, in terms of "viable" for the former and "obsolete" in the latter. But you can't get elected looking folks in the eye and saying "All 250,000 of you are doing jobs that simply shouldn't exist... Have you considered professions in banking?" It's all about getting elected, which means we're going to bail out everyone eventually.
-
My take on the terms of the government's bank bailout? The money is too cheap and government, in truth, should have placed itself above existing preferred stock. Why? Because the companies needed money more now than when they sold the prior preferred. You'll note that Buffett didn't price his endorsement deals
pari passu. Buffett, being a free-market git, invested in
General Electric and
Goldman Sachs on a "Perpetually Preferred" basis. If you pay taxes, you own Citi and all the rest of the "systemically important banks". Your broker should have gotten you (and me) better terms.
-
The specific reason I'm terrified for the rest of the market, except these banks, is because the economy is still burning down. Fixing the banks is snuffing the match that lit the cigarette that started the fire that's burning down the job markets, the industrial companies and the housing industry. It's a fine thing to have done -- if you accept intervention as inevitable and necessary -- but it's not nearly sufficient.
As a taxpayer, if you like being long Citigroup with me (and I think we'll both like it today), wait until you get a chance to bail out Ford at 1997 prices. I think you'll find that process slightly less pleasant.
Add it all up and here's how I'm feeling, pre-open at the time of this writing: I'm still long some Citigroup. I was giddy about taking gains yesterday, and sorry I'm not longer today. That said, I'm also disgusted by myself for trading the destructive decisions and genuinely fearful for what we are doing to what was left of the free market.
Top Stocks blogging partner Todd Harrison is founder & CEO of Minyanville.com. This post was written by Minyanville Contributor Jeff Macke.
Related Articles:
Jumping the Shark in Our Wishbone World?
Treasury Throws Good Money After Bad
What Banks Want