How Buffett will win in bailout - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

How Buffett will win in bailout

Posted Oct 02 2008, 01:52 PM by admin
Rating:

At a time when the country is obsessing over the need for a $700 billion fix for the economy, billionaire investor Warren Buffett is positioning himself to be one of its biggest beneficiaries.

Not that Buffett needs bailing out. Instead, he's doing what he does best: Buying assets on the cheap when he perceives he has an advantage.  As BusinessWeek points out, Buffett is doing what investors like John D. Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan have done in crises past, propping up faltering institutions.

But as he does so, Buffett, via his conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway, is playing salesman to average investors, even as he gets deals they could only dream of. Look at the GE deal: Buffett's buying $3 billion in perpetual preferred stock from General Electric. Buffett's investment has a 10% dividend -- $300 million a year --  and GE can’t undo the deal for three years. Buffett also gets the right to buy $3 billion in GE common shares at a price of $22.25. So he can sit back and watch the GE stock chart, and if it hits $45, for instance, he can double that $3 billion without having risked an extra dime.

GE will sell up to $12 billion in common stock to the public, which won't get anything like Buffett's sweetheart deal. Those investors will likely buy in because the Sage of Omaha did.  But all they get plain old shares with much smaller dividends that can disappear well before Buffett’s, in the event that GE runs into yet more trouble. And if they think GE’s stock price is going to $45, they have to take the risk now, not simply cash in down the road.

It's almost identical to the terms Buffett received when making an investment in Goldman Sachs. As Charley Blaine pointed out in this blog last week, Buffett invested $5 billion in Goldman and received preferred stock that pays a 10% annual dividend. In addition, Berkshire received warrants to buy $5 billion in Goldman Sachs common shares at a strike price of $115 that can exercised at any time over the next five years. Like GE, Goldman used Buffett as the pitchman to sell sold $5 billion in common stock.

Even with his advantageous position in both companies, Buffett's investments aren't without risk.  Other investors have bet that institutions like Washington Mutual would recover, and lost their shirts. No one's saying that the share prices of the companies won't go down; Goldman shares sank more than 5% this morning, for instance, while GE was down 9%, to slightly below Buffett's strike price.  That GE and Goldman would do these deals at all with Buffett shows just how desperate they are.

Yet Buffett has another advantage over the average investor. From his perch as the country's most successful, and famous, investor, he gets to scare the wits out of lawmakers just as they consider a bill that in all likelihood will prop up the both of his new investments.

"This really is an economic Pearl Harbor," Buffett said on "The Charlie Rose Show" Wednesday. "That sounds melodramatic, but I've never used that phrase before. And this really is one."

The timing of that interview is no mistake. Buffett wants the House Republicans who rejected the bill on Monday to know where he stands on the crisis, and the bailout, saying he expected lawmakers to do the right thing. The bailout could be a boon for Goldman and GE, both of which have seen their shares plummet more than 40% over the past year.

"In my adult lifetime, I don't think I've ever seen people as fearful economically as they are now," Buffett told Rose.

Fear for some. Opportunity for Buffett. ``You want to be greedy when others are fearful and you want to be fearful when others are greedy.''

-- Christopher Oster

Comments

 

Exactly why the poor taxpayers should not be funding a bailout!!!

Let someone making $40k per year bailout the banks and watch how much Buffet will benefit.  This world has gone mad!

This is just what we need, another high-powered individual trying to “help” lawmakers make up their minds.  Someone should ask Buffett if he were responsible to the citizens of Omaha (and not a billionaire) would he still support the bailout.  I think not.

We love Buffett!  People just remember one thing....he is giving all to charity, he is really giving his unbiased, yet biased guidance.  All of congress put together don't have the intelligence Buffett has.  I've been able to spend some time with this man.....I've told everyone I know that he is the brightest person alive.

Every time I hear someone talk about the economy they have nothing but negative things to say. When in reality they know nothing about it. So if you dont know what you are talking about keep your mouths shut and keep it to the professionals.

Josh,

All you are likely to receive with your comment above is a lot of negative support. Telling folks to shut their mouths when this aricle is desgined to drive interaction is just nearsighted goofyness and lack of maturity for stimulating discussion.

I think what this article is telling us is that if you have a lot of money, you can make things happen that the average investor cannot. With a 10% dividend, if those stocks do anything but go bankrupt, Warren will have recovered all of his investment in 10 years. He picked 2 companies that are not likely to go under and therefore, is actually taking very little long term risk with a huge amount of upside. You can't get a secure and safe 10% dividend or a 10% interest on anything these days. If you could, we would all be in that investment right now!

You can get 25% in National City....not that many would ever call that Safe and Secure

Buffett is a smart man allright, but he does indeed have a conflict of interest in all the propaganda he is busy about these recent days if for no other reason than the bulk of his portfolio is insurance companies which after all are just another financial institution that rises and falls with the markets.  Hello!!!!!!

Gee, this is exactly the kind of wealth and power that leaves the normal American in the ditch.  He can move markets, influence legislation, votes in Congress, etc.  I say he has too much power and control and shouldn't be allowed to position himself to make such excesses.  No wonder CEO's and Board members don't want the common investor to have too much power: they would NEVER stand for such a give-away to a single investor.  

Josh, you're clueless: what is a professional??  The same jerks that got us into this mess.........

There is no question this is all a mess..........what defines a professional financial mind?  I think it is simple, spend less than you make, low debt brings opportunities, high leverage brings pain.  Buffett has low debt, cash and a bright mind, why should he be faulted for this?  Again, where is all of his money going?  Thats right, CHARITY.......we will all benefit in some way by the good he and Gates are doing throughout the world with their money.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):