Economists criticize bailout plans
Posted
Sep 24 2008, 01:05 PM
by
Kim Peterson
Rating:
More than 100 academic economists are so worried about Hank Paulson's bailout plans that they sent a letter yesterday to Congress expressing concern. Several of the economists who signed are pretty big names, too. Click here for the letter, which is worth a read.
Here are their main criticisms of Paulson's plans:
It's unfair. The bailout gives investors a subsidy at taxpayers' expense. Investors know the rules of the game: You take risks in hopes of getting profits, but you also have to bear the losses. The government doesn't have to bail out investors and banks who made bad bets.
It's unclear. Paulson is asking taxpayers to buy "illiquid and opaque" assets. But what that means is still unclear. If he wants us to buy, he needs to make the details of the purchase crystal clear.
We're stuck with it. The effects of the plan will be with us for a generation. Weakening America's private capital markets in order to calm short-run disruptions is "desperately short-sighted."
The economists asked Congress not to rush on the plan. Instead, it should hold hearings and carefully consider what to do, because the outcome will affect the future of the financial industry and the economy for years.