Cash trashed: Money fund blows up - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Cash trashed: Money fund blows up

Posted Sep 16 2008, 08:46 PM by Jon Markman
Rating:
Filed under: ,

Extraordinary events are piling up on Wall Street so fast, it's hard to know where to focus. Forgetting the prospective bailout of AIG for a moment, since every media outlet is on that one, the most shocking development of the day for me is news that a $60 billion money market fund "broke the buck" on Monday due to losses in Lehman Brothers paper that it held. So much for the safety of "cash".

The Reserve Primary Money Fund (RPFXX) has become the first money-market fund in more than a decade to lose money because its board was forced to write down $785 million worth of LEH debt to zero. The fund reportedly has seen assets plunge by 60% to $23 billion in the past two days after holders got wind of the fact that it would have to cut its net asset value to less than its usual $1 per share.

Reserve Primary, which is one of the oldest money market funds in the country, is now trading at 97 cents, although it is showing up on the MSN Money site at $1. Its founder is considered the father of the money market fund, and he was one of the last holdouts against buying higher-yielding commercial paper rather than super-safe Treasuries. The company said in its that it would suspend redemptions for seven days while it tries to straighten things out. To review its most recent list of holdings, see its quarterly SEC filing here.

While the loss of 3 cents doesn't sound like much, you need to keep in mind that money market funds are where people put money when they don't want to lose anything. They are supposed to be the safest of the safe. Most pay interest of around 1% to 2.5%, depending on the type of paper that they hold.

Money market funds were the center of attention a year ago when it turned out that they were heavy buyers of a special type of paper from "structured investment vehicles" set up by banks like Citigroup. Those SIVs were issuing high-yield paper because they held CDOs loaded with subprime paper. As the subprime paper began to fail, the CDOs collapsed, leaving money market funds in danger. But their finances were shored up by their parent companies, and all was well until this week.

For more on the troubles with money market funds last winter, see my Dec. 31, 2007 column, "Your 'safe' money isn't so safe."

Related reading:

Fed to Wall Street: Drop dead

The death of value investing

3 more stocks for beating the bear

Comments

 

i am starting to worry about my kids college funds w/ 529K. Is it a wise move to stop my quarterly contribution for now? Should i withdraw all my funds even if i have to pay penalty?I dont trust anyone anymore.

Yo, Steve Meloke,

I guess you need to blame someone for the financial markets downturn. It seems to me that things were fine until the Democrats gained control of the Senate a year and a half ago. Makes you wonder, doesn't it?

Oh yeah, the Dems will come and save the day. NOT! Our politicians don't have a clue and none of this happened over night. While the "McSame" argument is a valid one the notion that Obama's plan is less disasterous is laughable. It's just bad in a different way. We're all screwed and the days of a strong America are over. It will take 10 to 15 years to recover so get used to it.

EVERYONE PLEASE CALM DOWN!

The Fundementals are good.

The Republican Party

What fundamentals? Act as careless as you like because the fed will save your bacon when you end up near bankrupt?

Len:  "It seems to me that things were fine until the Democrats gained control of the Senate a year and a half ago."

So.... you think the sub-prime loan/CDO fiasco just got started in 2007?  I don't see how anyone could be so easily fooled, yet here you are.

To LTEH,

Have you ever heard of buy low and sell high? I would keep contributing because the shares are cheap. As for the money that is already in there, you don't have many options. If you move it to a money market for a period of time, you will have a taxble event, but it may be a tax loss. Check with your tax advisor.

I just wish I knew whether the five years I have left before full retirement will be enough for the market to recover and for my losses to be restored.  What do you think?

I have known all along that the $ mkt funds were not LEGALLY OBLIGATED to never have the value of their shares fall $1.00.  However, THERE ARE ALTERNATIVES!  People may scoff at FDIC insurance, but until the entire US government goes "out-of-business" it is still the best game in town.  However (again), there are ways to easily insure FDIC money over the $100M limit.  Basic to this is the idea that you should only put $95M into each account so that the interest earned does not put the total in the account over $100M and you could lose the guarantee on that extra money.  Additionally, there are special accounts into which an investor can park money that is AUTOMATICALLY spread over several FDIC insured different banks!  There is also an option to FDIC insure up to $250M in retirement accounts.  So, THERE ARE OPTIONS.  

Good luck to all.

I'm with you Darwin but not holding my breath.  Trying to figure out a different method of financial independance and security.  It might some kind of self-employment with under the table earnings where I can set my own hours and determine my own destiny.  Huh... sounds a little like the American dream, oh well.  

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):