Sky-high Oil: We have been ripped off - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Sky-high Oil: We have been ripped off

Posted Sep 11 2008, 12:01 PM by Andrew Horowitz
Rating:

I have written on this topic several times before, but I would like you to take extra care and really absorb this today as I can't help to feel that between the energy fiasco and Fannie/Freddie, we have been ripped off. Later this week we will find out just how bad as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CTFC) will be releasing a report on oil market speculation.

If you have been a regular reader of MSN TopStocks over the past several months, I have been talking, writing, yelling and ranting about the obvious and rather incredible speculation that has occurred within the energy futures markets. It is remarkable how during that time, there has been a never ending stream of naysayers who have been confident that supply and demand is the only rationale for the parabolic rise of crude oil.

Now mind you, this comes from some pretty smart people who have been certain that in the short span of only a few months the world's supply was being outstripped due to the massive industrialized growth within China and India. Then, just as fast, that all changed because (as the tale goes) the price escalation actually dampened global consumption. Come on fellas, do we really look that stupid?

Sure, we knew that something was odd and that there was much more than met the eye with this. All along, the notion that a few major investment banks were involved and held financial stakes in the Intercontinental Commodity Exchange (ICE) was more than enough to raise our collective eyebrows. Of course, we now know that the ICE is the very center of the problem as it is the exchange that has been targeted as speculation-central because it has been operating without certain U.S. regulatory oversight for years.

(Listen to TDI Podcast 63: OIL-OIL-Enron Loophole-OIL-OIL for the amazing story of the Enron Loophole)

Over the past few days, there has been a growing interest in this and all of a sudden the media is in a frenzy. Why? Perhaps it is because it is finally shaping up to be to a great story with an even greater opportunity to move up a few notches in the ratings. (Cynical, who me?)

In my last TopStocks article on this subject, a few comments came in about the questionable lag between the passage of the Farm Bill, that had embedded in it the Energy Act of 2008, and the drop of crude oil prices. Some of the reason is that there was a 120-day compliance period after the approval date - which may have had something to do with the lag and....

The punch line: The fine print on the story and to get right down to the reason for the precipitous drop is simply this: On July 18, the CTFC had, "reclassified certain positions in the energy futures and options markets from the Commercial category to the Noncommercial category." Up until then, only commercial operations, such as airlines, manufacturers, farms, and their brokers who handled their futures trading activities had permission to trade almost without limits. Before the enactment, they were allowed as it was necessary for the stability of their business to reduce the effect of price fluctuations.

In addition, according to a Bloomberg report:

Commodity index investors, blamed for record oil prices, sold $39 billion worth of oil futures between a July record and Sept. 2, causing crude to plunge, according to a report released today.

The work by Michael Masters, president of the Masters Capital Management hedge fund, blames investors who buy and hold an index of commodities for driving prices to records and for their subsequent drop. It comes a day before the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission is set to discuss its own study of energy trading with a congressional committee.

Masters testified three times before Congress this year, arguing that limits on traders would cut oil prices to $65 to $70 a barrel. He has been cited by lawmakers who introduced at least 20 measures to curb speculation. Congressional pressure on the CFTC to step up enforcement and restrict anonymous trades has pushed index traders out of their positions, Masters said.

``I don't think it's just coincidence that the money came out after the pressure was put on these folks," Masters, who wants legislation that would set limits on index commodity holdings, said in an interview.

Details and additions of the included components of the June 17 announcement from the ICE, these specific conditions that have been added to ICE Futures Europe's no-action letter:

1. ICE Futures Europe will impose on IFE Linked Contracts, by rule or otherwise, position limits or position accountability levels (including related hedge exemption provisions) that are comparable to the existing position limits or position accountability levels (including related hedge exemption provisions) as adopted by: (i) the
DCM, DTEF or ECM for the contract against which the IFE Linked Contract settles or (ii) the DCM, DTEF or ECM for a financially-settled equivalent of such contract;
2. ICE Futures Europe will inform the Commission in a quarterly report of any member that had positions in an IFE Linked Contract above the applicable ICE Futures Europe position limit, whether a hedge exemption was granted, and if not, whether a disciplinary action was taken;

3. ICE Futures Europe will publish daily trading information (e.g., settlement prices, volume, open interest, and opening and closing ranges) that is comparable to the daily trading information published by the DCM, DTEF or ECM for the contract against which the ICE Futures Europe contract settles; and
4. ICE Futures Europe will provide to the CFTC, through the Financial Services Authority (FSA), a daily report of large trader positions in each IFE Linked Contract for all contract months in a form and manner that: * can be fully integrated into the CFTC's market surveillance systems, including full identification of each position's beneficial owner comparable to the reporting that is provided by the DCM, DTEF, or ECM; * can, subject to the Memorandum of Understanding between the CFTC and FSA, be fully integrated into the CFTC's Commitments of Traders Report, including appropriate categorization of traders and their positions.

So, what's next? Another bailout?


Related Reading:



Andrew Horowitz is a money manager and the founder of Horowitz & Company. He is also the author of the bestselling book, The Disciplined Investor . Check out his latest investment idea or listen in as he hosts, The Disciplined Investor Podcast.
Comments

 

I find it interesting that here in Ohio, when the price of cude jumps $2.00 per barrel, it is almost instantly reflected in a .50 increase in pump prices for gasoline...And yet, when the price of cude drops $4.00 per barrel, it takes a week for gasoline to come down .05 per gallon...With the price of oil at it's lowest point since April, why did we just have a .30 increase in the price of fuel???...Please don't tell me it's because a Huricane MIGHT damage offshore oil platforms...We've been having Huricanes since the begining of time, and I don't ever remember prices being effected this much...The simple fact is that we've allowed the big oil companies to establish a precident, and now it's pure greed...I also find it interesting that every station in town goes up the same amount, at the same time, on the same day of the week, (usually on Tuesday), and yet this is not price fixing...I wish I could run my business like that...

heah tsunami....please read follow the link carefully regarding big oil.... look at opec to blame........www.ftc.gov/ftc/oilgas/gascolumn.html

I suggest that shafted would be more appropriate. ''Screwed.'' Is a little weak, under the circumstances! Don't forget who got the world into this mess in the first

place! Sesame Street may be a little too violent for certain people! Have a nice day!

Ken Smith!  You hit the nail on the head, Baby! The squawking and bickering which occurs among most Americans based on the two-party system is what keeps us from getting what we want.  How many people does the average low to middle class American know who really support the war? How many really profit from large corporations and special interest groups? How many could even afford to run for Mayor of a small town?

  Democrat, Republican....it doesn't matter. They are all members of the same exclusive club that has been running this country for a century. They are all the same trust-fund brats and Ivy-leaguers who have always controlled America for as long as anyone can remember. Their mantra is this: keep us comfortable.  As long as we are comfortable, we don't mind some of the weird decisions coming from the power brokers and we don't dig too deep or question too much....we just accept.  Ken Smith is right.  If you want change, real change, fire them all. Forget that your family has been voting one way or the other since your GGGrandfather came through Ellis Island. Remember, everyone wants to protect what they have, and our politicians, irregardless of the party they represent, want to protect their sweet under-the-table dealings and investment stakes with major companies as much as you want to protect your 1000-2500 sf homes, your children and your retirement assets.  We can take America folks.  It is ours. We just have to be unafraid to stand up at the polls and fire every single incumbent every single time one comes up for re-election. Fire them all.

I thought index traders just bet on price so who cares. It's the ones that obtain physical control of the product that make it skyrocket like that one company from Europe did. They held back 11% of the crude going through the NYME. Should be the world's largest class-action suit!

Funny, 2-years of a democratic Congress, after a 'popular vote of No Confidence' of the republican Congress and yet nothing was done to curb or stop the energy speculators!  So much for 'Change' and 'Hope'!!!

I don't claim to be the brightest guy in the world but I think people have been taking money out of the stock market and buying into oil because they haven't been able to make any real money there for some time. This helped cause the price to go up. The light bulbs are just starting to go off concerning the transfer of wealth from us to nations like China and Saudi Arabia. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out. The election is going to be real close.

Gee.. Let me see>> Who has enough money to control  the market?? Opec?? Do you think they could buy  their own  oil on the open market and keep prices high. What about  our own oil companies... How come the price at the pump is not coming down if supplies are high?.When the oil companies own the oil fields,own the trucks,own the refineries, own  the gas stations, how can they say they do'nt control the price at the pump in view of billions in profit.... How stupid do they think we are??

Some of the posted comments don't take into account the long history of what has happened. Despite a few posts indicating that neither party protects the interests of the average American, I can say with a clear conscience that the de-regulated environment (whether it's shady Internet IPOs, electricity trading a la Enron, the real estate bubble/credit crisis/2nd S&L crisis introduced by exotic financial instruments or the role of speculators in the commodities markets) fought for over 20 years and then perpetuated by the Republicans (the party that controlled both houses of Congress before 2006, still occupies the White House and runs a majority on the Supreme Court) were behind all of these fiascos.

The reality is that the GOP permitted a few people to profit greatly at the expense of most Americans and sacrificed the future of the entire nation. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

It amazes me that people assume, since the president is a republican, that it is the president and the republican's fault.

Wake up, and look at the facts and not quote from some liberal or democrat paper.

Bush is not my favorite either; but truth be told the Democrats are in charge of Congress.

Congress makes laws. The President does not. Go back and read the Constitution.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):