S&P 500 primed for a fall? - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

S&P 500 primed for a fall?

Posted Sep 02 2008, 02:40 PM by Kim Peterson
Rating:
Filed under:

Tuesday's "uh-oh" story of the day comes from Bloomberg, which points out that shares of companies making up the S&P 500 Index are trading at 25.8 times profits, the highest valuation in five years. The last time that happened was in 2001, right before the dot-com bubble burst and U.S. companies lost about half their market value.

The problem, according to money managers, is that analysts are too optimistic about profits. Companies won't be able to reach the numbers analysts are predicting, and the high valuations are going to tumble. Analysts have overreached on profit in the last four quarters, according to Bloomberg.

"The fundamentals are going to be poor, earnings are going to be bad, and there are going to be more huge writedowns," money manager Philip Orlando said. "We think stocks probably need to work 5 to 10 percent lower over the next month or two.''

For the S&P 500 companies, analysts are expecting aggregate earnings of $21.69 a share in this current quarter and $24.62 in the fourth quarter. That's 3.9% and 62% higher than last year's third and fourth quarter, respectively. (No, that 62% is not a typo).

But some stocks are trading below the average valuation, including Gap, AK Steel, and Lexmark International. And some investment banks are telling clients to buy stock, expecting an earnings upturn.

Comments

 

Hello .....Anybody Home?

Yes they are way overvalued.........WAY WAY over.......

Wake up......

Wall Street is not real.....it is a big game that a group sits around and comes up with schemes to ovr leverage other peoples money.

Shut up stupid. Go buy your gold Kugerands and stuff themin your mattress.

So lets have this right, your saying that Analysts know nothing and Money managers know everything.

As always, broad generalizations are erroneous.  Sure, some of the S. & P. have high multiples--stay away from those.  However, there are some bargains out there.  Some stocks of well-managed companies are selling at 40 to  50% from their highs a few months ago.  Nucor for example.

Why do corporations, or anyone else for that matter,  respond to analyst's predictions.  Who annointed the analyst as the standard bearer of profit?  Remember, an analyst reviews & assesses historical data, not future results.  

Leave the future earnings  to my Tarot card reader, she's better at it.

WoW, Jefferson..get up on the wrong side of the bed..?

I hate to say it but more regulation is necessary !!!

He's right this stock market is a big joke just like OIL. Here comes a hurricane, raise the price of oil. Oh wait its not going to have an effect on oil. What happened to the extra money that was made over speculation. Just like the STOCK MARKET. These stocks are paying CEO's millions of dollars in salary and bonuses. For what??? If these people are so smart why didnt anyone see this coming. Alan Greenspan the biggest puppet. Name one time he said anything that made any sense. Always said I cannot "speculate". Reinvesting that money would probably make YOU a little bit more money. I have a retirement that I was told DIVERSIFY, DIVERSIFY, and DIVERSIFY. I did not listen. Now at this moment, I have more money in retirement then others who invested the same amount I have and diversified. Also credit scoring, another speculation. I wish people would wake up and smell the coffee. Hey wait!!!! ARUBA has weapons of mass destruction. $1 trillion + and some time later. ONLY KIDDING!!! We must stay the course anyway. Add all the money up that politicians stole from this country and their is the AMERICAN DREAM. So there suck it up. Oh yeah before I go!!! McCain's VP pick has 2 years experience!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!! Hes trying to make her look like Hillary!!! She sure is no HILLARY!!!

Wall street is done, we need to find another way!

This article is so typical of MSN.  Sensationalized headline grabbing title with no analysis in the article itself.  I'm not requesting that MSN produce an article that a seasoned analyst with an Ivy League MBA could interpret, but for God sakes, allow a little more meat to the article as to why the measurements utilized to support the argument are valid and what sensitivities might be employed to the variables.  I sure hope the average investor is more savy than what MSN gives them credit for, or we're nothing more than sheep being herded.  

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):