Americans own too many cars - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Americans own too many cars

Posted Jul 08 2008, 01:57 PM by Anthony Mirhaydari
Rating:

As $100 fill-ups become the norm and resale values for gas-guzzling vehicles plunge, owners of trucks and SUVs are getting a painful lesson in what economists call "demand destruction." In addition to switching from Ford F-150s to Toyota Priuses, rising oil prices may force Americans to follow Europeans with one car per family.

This would be the worst of all worlds for investors, since not only is the product mix shifting from high-margin truck-based products to lower-margin economy cars, but overall volumes would decline as well.  

Merrill Lynch economist David Rosenberg believes such a change is inevitable as drivers in the United States "totally change the way they live and move around" in response to gas prices. Consider that there are 40% more vehicles on the road than licensed drivers. Moreover, the average U.S. household owns 2.2 automobiles -- 10% more than in the early 1990s and 70% more than in 1955. So there is definitely a precedent for fewer cars per family.

One hope is that the lost volume could be offset by sales in emerging markets like China. After all, the number of cars per capita in China is at a level equivalent to the United States in 1915. Given its youth, plus generous fuel subsidies and rising incomes, the Chinese auto market is booming. First-half sales for both Ford and GM were up double-digits in what is already the world's second-largest auto market.

More specifically, annual sales of luxury cars and SUVs are up around 100%. As I discussed in a previous post on the popularity of SUVs in the Persian Gulf, traditionally American indulgences like three-ton Hummers are increasingly within the reach of those enriched by our great need for fuel and imported goods.

But this success will likely be short-lived. Those economies continue to depend on the embattled American consumer. And the subsidies enjoyed by the Saudis and the Chinese are becoming increasingly expensive and inflationary for their governments and their economies.

So despite the boom overseas, global car demand will eventually fall, further battering the troubled auto sector and its investors. Rosenberg thinks 50-100 million autos could eventually be taken off the road in the United States -- and I just don't see international sales compensating for a loss of that magnitude quickly enough. His advice: "Try adding some light rail to the portfolio."

Related reading:

GM sales up everywhere but here

The long, slow descent of GM

The death of the minivan (& Chrysler?)

(Disclosure: I don't own shares in the companies mentioned)

Comments

 

We are a 3 car + 1 motorcycle family.  Just because we have 3 cars doesn't mean that they are all brand new every 2 years and are being driven every minute of every day.  

I use the SUV ('99) for the kids and family trips, the VW ('02 Beetle) for my commute and the third is an older pick-up ( '87)  that was given to us by my father-in-law.  We don't drive it often, but it's great to have a truck when we need it and we also lend it out to friends when they need to move or haul things.  We live a mile from my husband's workplace and they let him take his worktruck home during the week.  

Does anyone know the fossil fuel cost of producing a brand new vehicle?  I am curious.  

We live in a democratic republic based on capitalizm.  It is not perfect, but it works better then the rest.  Supply and demand should drive prices and products, not goverrment bureaucracy, or special interest groups.  If we leave these factors to work with in their principles, consumers will force the market to follow.

The goverment, especially the fedral goverment, should keep thier noses out of daily business, and special interest groups should have to compete like all other business'.  I am not opposed to products that protect the enviroment or promote safety, but I am opposed to being forced to use them through legislation.  If you want products that are GREEN, then produce them at a competiitve level and allow the consumer to prove you right.  

I don't agree with that, Europe is much smaller and therefore you can get by without a car.  In the States you must have a car.  

WITH AL OUR PROBLEMS WE ARE STILL THE GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD

I believe this report is biased, but I think the the auto industry will be hurt unless they can cause people to pay higher margins for those small cars.  I think you can buy a lot of gas with the difference you pay for a second hand pick-up truck as opposed to a new "small" car (probably save on insurance also).  Also you can use all kinds of fuel mixtures when you aren't worried about the corrosion it might cause to your BMW (which I believe can be as inefficient as a Hummer if you so like).  Free markets are a funny thing, they create all kinds of opportunities and trade offs.

WE NEED TO BOYCOTT ALL THE OIL COMPANIES AND MAKE THEM FEEL THE PAIN AT THE PUMP.

Cool,  There will be even better deals on big A@# loaded SUV's...Leather and all the goods.  Pay cash and cut out the banker, lower your taxes and drive with liabilty insurance only.  Its all relative....just buy a motorcylce.  Take the train...WALK...quit letting fear and the fact we need to bomb Iran get in the way.

So higher gas prices will make you modifiy your daily excursions. That must be good news to those who believe in Green house gas/carbin footprints polution.

Plus possibly lead to a viable alternative fuel, or power trains for transportation.

Now dont you feel good about yourself? You're making this world a little greener.

Hey,

Maybe we have more cars because the wife no longer stays at home but has to go work to pay for the over-priced declining value home currently being rented from the bank.  Even with gas as high as it is, there is a certain level of driving that cannot be stopped.  Get a clue, dolt.

Sometimes, having an extra car (or two) in the family can be a GOOD idea. Now, I'm not saying that additional taxes and registration fees are a good thing, but look at it from an efficiency standpoint. Mom drives the two kids to school in the gas-sipping small car, then heads to her own job. Dad drives his small-sized truck to work. But on the weekends, the full-sized SUV, which has been sitting idle all week, gets taken out for a family trip to grandma's house.

This might be an even better deal as the price for new, and USED gas guzzler's keep dropping, like it did during the 1970's oil embargo. Why drive a full-sized vehicle everyday when you only need it occasionally? There are some things small, gas efficient vehicles simply cannot do: haul a family of 5-7 almost anywhere, pull a boat/trailer/RV, bring home bulky building materials to finish that needed home project, etc.

One of my coworkers drives a scooter than gets over 80mpg while his full-sized truck sits at home. On the weekends, the scooter gets a rest in the garage while the truck pulls the boat + family to their weekend getaway on a nearby lake.

Jethro Bodine

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):