Americans own too many cars - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Americans own too many cars

Posted Jul 08 2008, 01:57 PM by Anthony Mirhaydari
Rating:

As $100 fill-ups become the norm and resale values for gas-guzzling vehicles plunge, owners of trucks and SUVs are getting a painful lesson in what economists call "demand destruction." In addition to switching from Ford F-150s to Toyota Priuses, rising oil prices may force Americans to follow Europeans with one car per family.

This would be the worst of all worlds for investors, since not only is the product mix shifting from high-margin truck-based products to lower-margin economy cars, but overall volumes would decline as well.  

Merrill Lynch economist David Rosenberg believes such a change is inevitable as drivers in the United States "totally change the way they live and move around" in response to gas prices. Consider that there are 40% more vehicles on the road than licensed drivers. Moreover, the average U.S. household owns 2.2 automobiles -- 10% more than in the early 1990s and 70% more than in 1955. So there is definitely a precedent for fewer cars per family.

One hope is that the lost volume could be offset by sales in emerging markets like China. After all, the number of cars per capita in China is at a level equivalent to the United States in 1915. Given its youth, plus generous fuel subsidies and rising incomes, the Chinese auto market is booming. First-half sales for both Ford and GM were up double-digits in what is already the world's second-largest auto market.

More specifically, annual sales of luxury cars and SUVs are up around 100%. As I discussed in a previous post on the popularity of SUVs in the Persian Gulf, traditionally American indulgences like three-ton Hummers are increasingly within the reach of those enriched by our great need for fuel and imported goods.

But this success will likely be short-lived. Those economies continue to depend on the embattled American consumer. And the subsidies enjoyed by the Saudis and the Chinese are becoming increasingly expensive and inflationary for their governments and their economies.

So despite the boom overseas, global car demand will eventually fall, further battering the troubled auto sector and its investors. Rosenberg thinks 50-100 million autos could eventually be taken off the road in the United States -- and I just don't see international sales compensating for a loss of that magnitude quickly enough. His advice: "Try adding some light rail to the portfolio."

Related reading:

GM sales up everywhere but here

The long, slow descent of GM

The death of the minivan (& Chrysler?)

(Disclosure: I don't own shares in the companies mentioned)

Comments

 

I agree with those who think the article author is an idiot.  That goes for a lot of the comments that followed, as well.  I could make the case that the current fuel situation could actually favor the notion of owning more than one car.  Economically but practical people who have a use for a larger car, truck or SUV would opt to use it more sparingly as actually required, and purchase a commuter car for local, light payload trips.    I'm single, but own two cars.   I can only drive one at a time, so I don't use any more gas.  The older car is fully depreciated, and I only carry minimum liability insurance on it.  each has a different purpose.  I'm economically prudent and have already cut my overall usage.  How would I save gas by selling one or the other?  

We Americans have long been the world's greatest per capita consumers of petroleum. As the rest of the world demands its own larger piece of the energy pie, it will become increasingly impossible to keep oil cheap for Americans, even if we are able to develop more of our domestic oil resources. Do you think the oil companies drilling new oil in Alaska will sell their gas for two bucks a gallon here if they could sell it to Chinese consumers for five?  As it becomes increasingly expensive, we'll simply be forced to rethink how we choose to use our energy, and that's going to necessitate changes in our automobile-centric culture.

Millions of people in other countries with equivalent standards of living live out full, happy and imaginative lives without anything near the dependence upon automobiles and personal travel that we have created for ourselves. As the global energy situation evolves, it may be possible for us to shift our personal resources to maintain for a time what we think of as the "right" way to get around, but sooner or later push will come to shove and the changes will happen out of simple necessity. That will mean fewer, smaller cars, a demand for improved public transportation, and a focus on keeping travelling to a necessary minimum. People won't decide to make those sacrifices as much as they will just start doing them because they will be the smartest solutions to the problem at hand.

Car pool with one other person and save 50%, car pool with two people and save 67% assuming everyone takes turns driving. In addition to the savings on fuel cost & wear & tear on vehicles imagine the effects on air quality, dependence on foreign oil & traffic.  

Just thinking out loud...

Y'all whine too much. I don't care about gas prices, I don't care about car prices. Just make em clean so I can breathe and I'll find a way to pay. I'm not giving up anything, this is America and I can make freaking fortune!

So, Benjamin, if you buy a smaller auto, you are a "better", more capable driver.

Idiot alert!!!!

What does it matter how many cars I own? I can only drive one at a time...I can buy a hundred cars and still only be spending the same ammount of gas money as the next guy. If you can find me a bus that takes me directly to work and back, takes my kids safely to school so I know for a fact that they will be there, and keep my wife employed as well...that will be the day I can say "I have too many cars".

I think that everyone is missing the point of the article. We do have many vehicles just as we have many other types of tools. One size does not fit all so having choices is not a bad thing. We must be smarter about how we choose to do what we do. There is no sense in using a 10 MPG SUV to drive 40 miles to work every day but the commuter hack will not tow the camper either. Growth of rail systems will also help with the daily commutes by relieving highway congestion and the perennial road construction. Now if we could just wean ourselves from long-distance trucking...

For most of the past 5 years my hubby and I share 1 car btwn us. Although OC has the *best* public trans sys in the entire country we  still can't get to work from home via public trans.

We are driving a PT Cruiser, not a real SUV, we run most of our errands on the way to or from work and driving more than 5 miles round trip by yourself is discouraged.

Anything else you want us to do? I agree w/the previous post - if you don't live in a downtown setting, public transportation is not an option! Now thanks to the serious home market fiasco, even renting closer to work is no longer an option.

Having multiple vehicles allows you to have a car that is good on fuel efficiency to go to work, have a pickup for when i need to haul things bigger than what a Toyota or Honda can handle, and an SUV so when all of us want to go out  in one vehicle instead of 3.  The way I see it, mulitiple vehicles is more green than just having one, it's not like I can drive 2 vehicles at once.  Tell me what one vehicle is good on gas, high tow capacity, high storage and person capacity?  

1 car households huh?  I'm not sure how that is going to solve anything.  My wife and I have a Honda Accord, Ford F150,a Ford Expedition and 2 street motorcycles.  My wife commutes about 45 miles each way (in the Accord).  I commute approx 3 miles each way (F150).  If we were to nix 2 of the vehicles (going with the article the F150 and Expedition), we would have nothing to tow our trailer, nothing to haul our dirtbikes, and nothing to pick up large items for the house.  Also, we would double the miles on the Accord daily, and 1 of us would spend extra hours in traffic.  So how does that help the economy?  

Oil prices are skyrocketing, the economy is weak, and people are panicing.  This happens about every 25 years or so.  It's a cycle people, deal with it.  

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):