Americans own too many cars - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Americans own too many cars

Posted Jul 08 2008, 01:57 PM by Anthony Mirhaydari
Rating:

As $100 fill-ups become the norm and resale values for gas-guzzling vehicles plunge, owners of trucks and SUVs are getting a painful lesson in what economists call "demand destruction." In addition to switching from Ford F-150s to Toyota Priuses, rising oil prices may force Americans to follow Europeans with one car per family.

This would be the worst of all worlds for investors, since not only is the product mix shifting from high-margin truck-based products to lower-margin economy cars, but overall volumes would decline as well.  

Merrill Lynch economist David Rosenberg believes such a change is inevitable as drivers in the United States "totally change the way they live and move around" in response to gas prices. Consider that there are 40% more vehicles on the road than licensed drivers. Moreover, the average U.S. household owns 2.2 automobiles -- 10% more than in the early 1990s and 70% more than in 1955. So there is definitely a precedent for fewer cars per family.

One hope is that the lost volume could be offset by sales in emerging markets like China. After all, the number of cars per capita in China is at a level equivalent to the United States in 1915. Given its youth, plus generous fuel subsidies and rising incomes, the Chinese auto market is booming. First-half sales for both Ford and GM were up double-digits in what is already the world's second-largest auto market.

More specifically, annual sales of luxury cars and SUVs are up around 100%. As I discussed in a previous post on the popularity of SUVs in the Persian Gulf, traditionally American indulgences like three-ton Hummers are increasingly within the reach of those enriched by our great need for fuel and imported goods.

But this success will likely be short-lived. Those economies continue to depend on the embattled American consumer. And the subsidies enjoyed by the Saudis and the Chinese are becoming increasingly expensive and inflationary for their governments and their economies.

So despite the boom overseas, global car demand will eventually fall, further battering the troubled auto sector and its investors. Rosenberg thinks 50-100 million autos could eventually be taken off the road in the United States -- and I just don't see international sales compensating for a loss of that magnitude quickly enough. His advice: "Try adding some light rail to the portfolio."

Related reading:

GM sales up everywhere but here

The long, slow descent of GM

The death of the minivan (& Chrysler?)

(Disclosure: I don't own shares in the companies mentioned)

Comments

 

We own 3 vehicles: my wife has a 4 cylinder fuel efficient car for her 27 mile one way commute to her job, and I have an SUV and motorcycle.  I mainly use the motorcycle because there's no need to drive the big SUV for just one person.  It saves fuel, and we have the SUV in case we buy something big (save on shipping costs), or the family comes to visit and we need to haul them all around. My commute is only 10 miles. Just like Chris said, Just because we have 3 vehicles doesn't mean we use all of them.  We need the SUV for hauling big stuff, but for commuting, I stick with the fuel efficient motorcycle.

Who cares what they do or don't do in Europe. This is America lets keep it that way.

Wow, reading this blog & the responses, its amazing to see how our education system has failed us.  Or maybe its not the education system, but justy that 80% of mankind is too stupid to do more than throw spears at wooley mammoths.  Maybe it was all that alcohol & drug "experimentation" in HS & college....

One car per family--that's funny.  Europe must be wonderful.  I guess that's why their fuel prices are so low?  As Brooke stated above, unless you and your spouse work in the same location, AND the kids' school is on the way to work, AND they have a ride home after sports, it just doesn't work.  Two working parents with jobs at opposite ends of the city/county, 2 kids in sports, 1 big dog, and extremely limited mass transit options = multi-car.  Two of our cars get decent mpg (22-30), while the third is the evil SUV, admittedly used less when fill-ups exceeded $75.  If I had the time, I think I could write a just-as-foolish article explaining how the number of cars per family is INCREASING, as many people I know have picked up a fuel efficient used car to run errands and taxi the kids, to leave the SUV parked in wait for the next family outing or vacation.   Bottom line, we're conserving realistically.  Oil companies and futures investors should also try being realistic when setting profit margins and reinvestment in exploration and refinery construction.    

Hmmm....it seems there's some anger and hostility in this thread. Well, My Fellow Americans, get ready for financial pain, and more PHYSICAL activity. We've been buying into corporate lies for far too long. Gas will likely continue to get more expansive, and these may be the "Good ole' Days" in a few years. Simplify your lives. 1. Get out of credit card debt.(while you still can) 2. Breathe, meditate, and slow down to the speed limit.(its only a couple minutes, you're going to get there in about the same amount of time) 3. Find cheaper things to do in your off-time.

4. Make dinner at home more often.  THINK. Be critical of what companies really want from you.  Would wind, solar and electric really be a such a bad thing? The sooner we get away from the internal combustion engine, the better for all of us.

You must have bumped you head and if not that you have been sniffing the gas fumes when you filled up your car (if you own one).  Let's get this right...we are paying more at the pump because we have an ineffective government.  Emerging markets like China and the middle east supplement the cost of gasoline to its citizens while they are using more to fuel their expanding markets.  In the meantime, Americans take the hit and the blame for abuse and overuse.  You belong to the same group of preople that believe in global warming, the return of the ice age and the sky in falling.  We need more responsible people in responsible postions telling more truths instead of convenient suppositions.

I DONT THINK SWITCHING TO HYBRID VEHICULES WILL MAKE A SIGNIFICANT SHORT TERM DIFFERENCE.ACTUALLY MOST HYBRID VEHICULES ARE JUST SCAMS.THE LEXUS RX 400H  DOES ONLY 24 MPG AND "FUEL-EFFICIENT"HYBRID SUV'S SUCH AS THE TAHOE(20MPG!!)ARE JOKES DESTINED TO TRICK THE CONSUMER. EUROPEANS HAVEN'T REACTED TO HIGH GAS PRICES BY BUYING HYBRID TOYOTAS AND GIVING JOBS TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES, THEY HAVE BUILT SMALLER CARS THAT ACTUALLY CONSUME A LOT LESS THAN HYBRIDS AND THEY'VE SWITCHED TO DIESEL ENGINS.FRENCH CAR COMPANY CITROEN HAVE MADE A CONCEPT CAR CALLED THE C-CACTUS THAT DOES MORE THAN 80MPG...(2.2 LITERS FOR 100KM),EVEN THE PRIUS DOES ONLY 50MPG!,THOUGH ACCORDING TO TOYOTA ENGINEERS THE FUTUR MODEL WILL DO 90MPG. IF THAT TURNS OUT TO BE TRUE IT WILL BE IMPRESSIVE.

We have an old F250 truck, and we drive 1-2 times a month when we REALLY need a truck.  We plan the stuff we haul with it a head of time.  We have started commutting together 2-3 days week.  But we will still keep 2 cars and one truck.  Our old truck is GREAT, you can't haul major building stuff, pull a horse trailer, or haul cut down trees to dump with a car.  

Which phase are we in?

Anger or denial?

I doubt the author intends to skewer the family with jobs on either end of town and three kids!  Notice the mention of MORE CARS than DRIVERS?  Two cars to a family (with small kids) is not more cars than drivers.

This article is for people like my father-in-law who owns...oh wait for it...

-Two cars

-A truck

-And three motorcycles...all between him and my mother-in-law.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):