Dark days for Starbucks: Job cuts and store closures - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Dark days for Starbucks: Job cuts and store closures

Posted Jul 02 2008, 01:31 AM by Anthony Mirhaydari
Rating:

Finally, some good news from Starbucks: the coffee-shop behemoth is closing 600 stores and cutting 12,000 jobs, roughly 7% of its global workforce.

This is a gutsy move for founder Howard Schultz, who just recently retook the helm with broad pronouncements of returning to roots and reigniting the "emotional attachment with customers" that has been lost over time. After all, Starbucks now has 16,226 locations, up from just 1,886 over the last 10 years. With operations in such faraway lands as Lebanon, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Argentina, and Romania, Starbucks' expansionist future once seemed boundless.  

Instead, Starbucks is discovering what it's like to be classified as a truly discretionary expense by customers who've not only checked out emotionally, but are rationally trying to negotiate a difficult economic environment. Whether this means packing around homebrews, stopping by Dunkin' Donuts and McDonald's, or hitting up the office coffee machine, formerly loyal consumers are deserting in droves.

Calling the $350 million in cuts the "most angst-ridden decision we have made," Schultz showed he's able to embrace unorthodoxy; which comes as a surprise to many who figured he was blinded by his prior successes. It seems, in what is a remarkable transformation for a man obsessed with the metaphysical qualities of his company, that nothing is sacrosanct.

Such creative destruction lies at the heart of healthy capitalism. Instead of spreading like a cancer across the globe, selling a disjointed mishmash of milky coffee, stuffed animals, CDs, books, and branded merchandise, Starbucks has been forced to reevaluate its existence.

A single-minded focus on coffee isn't the key: Indeed, the company is gearing up for the launch of a new cold drink with "a frozen smooth texture and fruit-, dairy-, and yogurt-based ingredients" as described by McAdams Wright Ragen analyst Dan Geiman. The new Italian drink, codenamed "Project Ferrari," will be launched in California this summer, and nationwide in 2009.

Even the story of the drink's origin is fascinating, if slightly disconcerting in its desperation. Within 48 hours of an associate calling it the next Frappuccino, Starbucks' corporate air force descended upon a small town in Italy. A deal was forged in a matter of weeks with a suddenly moneyed Italian.

Although the road ahead is unclear, and no doubt treacherous, Shultz seems reassuringly confident. In his words: "There's a piece of me that is embracing this underdog thing where people are counting us out, because they're going to be wrong. I promise you that. They're going to be wrong."

In the meantime, Dan Geiman is looking for earnings per share of 82 cents this year, down from 87 cents in 2007 on slower traffic and squeezed margins. Shares are trading at 19 times the estimate, inline with its competitors in the specialty eateries segment. Technically, shares are at a critical juncture: Any further fall would enter the abyss.

Previous posts:

A plan to rescue Starbucks

Free Wi-Fi at Starbucks starts today

Starbucks dumps T-Mobile for AT&T Wi-Fi

(Disclosure: I don't own any shares of the companies mentioned.) 

Comments

 

Actually,$7.00 is for more than beans and water, those drinks usually involve many other ingredients.  I've thought that with the change in command at Starbucks they would move towards fiscal responsibility, and this shows that.  Shutting down stores that aren't making it make sound financial advise.  I still will stop by occassionally to get a cup of coffee (just coffee) but I agree there is one areain my budget  that I can cut without much angst.  Good Luck Starbucks.

Laura,  for someone who claims to dislike Starbucks so much, you sure know alot about their products.  You may not like their coffee, but million do and that's the reason they are so successful.  Just like with anything else, if you don't like Starbucks coffee... just don't buy it, period.  I for one, am still happy to wait in line for my mocha with whip!!!

I gave up Starbucks long before gas prices increased.  I can make a good cup of coffee, latte, espresso, or chai at home on my own brewing system.  I don't have to stand in line.  I am sorry to see working people lose their jobs.

I greatly enjoy the littel mocha creation I have come up with and my local starbucks crew starts prepping as soon as they see me drive into the parking lot.

There is more to these neighborhood stores than overprized coffee .

However, those location operating inside other stores and convention centers should just be done away with... they are a waste of time and money and do nothing, in my mind, for the image and well being of the company and it's customers.

Schultz is a very smart man.  He grew the business to the point where he squeezed every last drop out of the cusumer possible.  Now he knows where he stands.  He probably expects to close more locatons and expand where the demand is greatest. This pause is nothing more than the business maturing.  It will stabalize at some point.  The tricky part will be reinventing itself to get the next leg up, or it will  vanish eventually in the present state.

You had a nice run Mr Schultz, now the real work begins.

THEY REFUSED COFFEE TO GI'S IN IRAQ BECAUSE THEY DID NOT SUPPORT THE WAR, WELL DESERVED. OUR FATHERS NOW OUR CHILDREN FIGHT TO PRESERVE THE FREEDOMS WE HAVE IN THIS COUNTRY, WE EVEN LET PEOPLE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES COME HERE AND ABUSE THE FREEDOMS WE HAVE FOUGHT AND CONTINUE TO FIGHT TO PRESERVE. THE TROUBLE WE HAVE ARE CAUSED BY THE JEALOSIES OF FEW, WHO WANT YOU TO BELEIVE AS THEY DO AS HITLER DID.

AND THE SHAME IS WE LET SOME OF OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS TRY TO PUSH THEIR AGENDAS FOR THEIR PERSONAL GAINS RATHER THAN THE PEOPLE THEY REPRESENT.  

This should be a wake up call to america on just how bad the ecomony is.   The feds, state and local governments no longer can keep afloat, how about the common middle class. Now we are losing some coffee hang outs! How sad is this?  What next, grocery stores.

No $5 coffee for me. I've always gotten my 7-11 coffee for about $1.

I live in Idaho, and because we are a right to work state, wages are lower, I think that the last time I checked we were ranked 48th nationally as far as wages.  That said, I admire Starbucks for providing a living wage for employees, along with benefits.  That speaks volumns about an organization or business.  I seriously doubt, that other places one could go to get a fast cup of coffee provide their employees the same benefits and wages.  I wholly support Starbucks because it is one of those businesses that rose up from relative obscurity in the Northwest and make it big.  If Starbucks keeps up the bottom line, keeps providing us a great beverage, keeps valuing their employees they will continue into the future.

It is comical that the coffee snobs here suggest SBUX embrace a discrimanatory stance and focus on ridding their store of "burrito-brained" consumers.  That is precisely the complaint that person after person posted about Abercrombie & Fitch, the first store where customers and employees interact face-to-face to ever make the MSN top 10 customer service "Hall of Shame" list.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):