Dark days for Starbucks: Job cuts and store closures - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Dark days for Starbucks: Job cuts and store closures

Posted Jul 02 2008, 01:31 AM by Anthony Mirhaydari
Rating:

Finally, some good news from Starbucks: the coffee-shop behemoth is closing 600 stores and cutting 12,000 jobs, roughly 7% of its global workforce.

This is a gutsy move for founder Howard Schultz, who just recently retook the helm with broad pronouncements of returning to roots and reigniting the "emotional attachment with customers" that has been lost over time. After all, Starbucks now has 16,226 locations, up from just 1,886 over the last 10 years. With operations in such faraway lands as Lebanon, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Argentina, and Romania, Starbucks' expansionist future once seemed boundless.  

Instead, Starbucks is discovering what it's like to be classified as a truly discretionary expense by customers who've not only checked out emotionally, but are rationally trying to negotiate a difficult economic environment. Whether this means packing around homebrews, stopping by Dunkin' Donuts and McDonald's, or hitting up the office coffee machine, formerly loyal consumers are deserting in droves.

Calling the $350 million in cuts the "most angst-ridden decision we have made," Schultz showed he's able to embrace unorthodoxy; which comes as a surprise to many who figured he was blinded by his prior successes. It seems, in what is a remarkable transformation for a man obsessed with the metaphysical qualities of his company, that nothing is sacrosanct.

Such creative destruction lies at the heart of healthy capitalism. Instead of spreading like a cancer across the globe, selling a disjointed mishmash of milky coffee, stuffed animals, CDs, books, and branded merchandise, Starbucks has been forced to reevaluate its existence.

A single-minded focus on coffee isn't the key: Indeed, the company is gearing up for the launch of a new cold drink with "a frozen smooth texture and fruit-, dairy-, and yogurt-based ingredients" as described by McAdams Wright Ragen analyst Dan Geiman. The new Italian drink, codenamed "Project Ferrari," will be launched in California this summer, and nationwide in 2009.

Even the story of the drink's origin is fascinating, if slightly disconcerting in its desperation. Within 48 hours of an associate calling it the next Frappuccino, Starbucks' corporate air force descended upon a small town in Italy. A deal was forged in a matter of weeks with a suddenly moneyed Italian.

Although the road ahead is unclear, and no doubt treacherous, Shultz seems reassuringly confident. In his words: "There's a piece of me that is embracing this underdog thing where people are counting us out, because they're going to be wrong. I promise you that. They're going to be wrong."

In the meantime, Dan Geiman is looking for earnings per share of 82 cents this year, down from 87 cents in 2007 on slower traffic and squeezed margins. Shares are trading at 19 times the estimate, inline with its competitors in the specialty eateries segment. Technically, shares are at a critical juncture: Any further fall would enter the abyss.

Previous posts:

A plan to rescue Starbucks

Free Wi-Fi at Starbucks starts today

Starbucks dumps T-Mobile for AT&T Wi-Fi

(Disclosure: I don't own any shares of the companies mentioned.) 

Comments

 

Brutally expensive coffee, brutally large ego, treated our troops in Iraq like junk, as they do their customers here. Oh...what a shock...Starbucks isn't doing good??? Why the hell you say!!!

What a marketing Plan....place a bunch of stores in the same small area. They have too many stores even in great economic times. I have been drinking their coffee for years. Great coffee but crazy marketing plan.

I agree with EM and Laura.  I never understood why people would pay so much money for such an inferior product.  What emotional attachment?  That statement in itself tells you what's wrong with the company and its founder.  The only attachment Starbucks has is how to attach my money to their company.  How many times does the public have to say it:  Drop your prices!  For goodness sake's, it's just coffee!

I am sure that Schultz or some other jackass exec is going to get a hefty bonus for making such a brave costcutting decision.  How heartwarming to know that while 12,000 people lose their jobs because of idiotic expansion plans, some exec is still going to be able to make his/her boat payments.  

Over priced, badly made coffee , that in Italy, where espresso was perfected  costs a lot less and is a whole lot better, even in the worst coffee house. Phony European names like frappa something or other.  Stupid attempt to get hourly workers to pronounce names like doppio or grande....just call it a double or large.  Realisation by many that paying $2-5 for a product that has about .10 - .30 in costs is a rip off and finally the prevalence of good quality home brew products has all been responsible for the decline of Starbucks.  In spite of what Schultz says, Starbucks is now passe' and will rank up there with the Burger Kings and Wendys and others whose time has come and gone......no matter how many stupid drink concoctions they attempt..the bottom line is Starbucks was a fad and when there were only a few stores people were curious, since there were a lot of people in the stores. So you wanted to see what it was about... Now that they are everywhere, the mystic has gone and people realize it is nothing special, never was and never will be again...

Starbucks does support the war.  Just look what they do for our soldiers on Snoops.  they may not do it the way one person wanted them to but believe me, they send their share of coffee to our GI's and love doing it every month!

note to Salimbe:   PLEASE VERIFY THE TRUTH  BEFORE SPREADING EVIL FALSEHOODS!

The info about starbucks " AS THEY REFUSED COFFEE TO GI'S IN IRAQ BECAUSE THEY DID NOT SUPPORT THE WAR"     is 100% false.  Go to Snopes.com for verification.  

Otherwise, this is just sad for all the people that will lose jobs over the closures!!!  This will probably average to over 5000  or 6000 in job losses.  Their workers are just as human and have the same requirements as the rest of us.  Try to have a little sympathy for THEM, rather than GLOATING about the corporation's decision.

I happen to like their coffee at my local place, but usually opt for it as a treat.  Let's face it with kids, mortgage, and every day necessities, it is hard to justify a daily latte or cappuccino at 3.65 a pop.  As with all things in life, the bubble finally bursts.  Now the Gourmet Coffee is seeing the end of it's heyday.

I WORKED AT STARBUCKS AND YES THE WORKERS WERE VERY IMPERSONAL,

I ALWAYS GREETED MY CUSTOMERS WITH QUICK SERVICE AND A GOOD

MORNING AND HAVE A NICE DAY WITH THANK YOU. THEY DO NEED TO CLOSE

600 STORES WHEN YOU HAVE TWO WITHIN 5 MINUTES APART. THEY LOST THE

THE WHOLE COFFEE EXPERIENCE WITH OTHER JUNK IN THE STORE. THEY ALSO

NEED TO CHECK THEIR MANAGERS OUT BETTER.

"Gosh, I love the taste of their coffee!"  It is one of the little things I look forward to every day.  This is America.  If you don't like their coffee, or it is too expensive for you, then you don't have to buy it.  Some of us just feel better about ourselves when we learn of others falling on hard times.  Try thinking of the 12,000 jobs being lost.

Convenient--Yes, Economic--No, Good tasting--No.  Starbucks is everywhere and it is not the best coffee by far.  If any of the loyal customers ever tasted true coffee from a nice, small, cozy, independently owned local coffee shop, then Starbucks would never have reached the numbers they have. why? B/c nice hand tamped espresso and espresso drinks taste sooooo much better than  that daggone machine made, watered down product you now get from Starbucks.  This is just another opportunity for everyone to see the fall of our American economy--luxuries go first, especially when they aren't the best thing going anyhow.  One good thing for Starbucks--the joint venture with Magic Johnson and the urban underserved area growth--Kudos for that--please don't close those stores.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):