New Web sites coming soon - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

New Web sites coming soon

Posted Jun 26 2008, 12:56 PM by Kim Peterson
Rating:

We could see some strange new Web URLs in the future, now that the group that oversees them has changed the rules. Now, people can apply for any domain extension, instead of sticking with the familiar ".com" or ".org." For example, Coca-Cola could use ".coke" in its URL, or Yahoo could apply for the ".yahoo" domain.

It opens up a new world of Web site creativity, and will spur another gold rush for the hot domains. That could mean trouble for speculators like Marchex, which has spent millions of dollars buying up different ".com" domains in hopes the sites will become popular enough to support an advertising network. Shares of Marchex are down nearly 2% to $13.21 at 10:30 a.m. PST.

Marchex was counting on a certain logic to the Web. The idea was that people would become so used to ".com" that they would simply type words followed by ".com" into the browser address bar. Someone interested in digital cameras, for example, could type "www.digitalcameras.com" and find links to cameras by Kodak and Sony. Direct navigation, as it's called, was thought to be a plausible alternative to Google's search bar.

Direct navigation may become a relic of the Internet, however, when companies start throwing all kinds of domain names at us like "drink.bud," "kodak.camera" or "shop.ebay." And that could be good news for Google, because it'll all be so confusing that we'll have to rely on search engines even more to get us to the Web sites we want. (The new domains will cost at least $100,000, by the way, so forget about your plans to register "mycat.rocks".)

Marchex, by the way, is more than just a domain parker. The company has invested in editorial content and wants to own a network of meaningful destination sites that will attract advertisers. The new domain system won't affect that goal, but it puts a key element of Marchex's overall strategy in question. Marchex shares have climbed 30% this year, but the stock may have just peaked.

Related reading:

Web domains could expand broadly under new plan

ICANN threatens to change the rules of the domain name game

New Internet domains: What do they mean for me?

 

Comments

 

Ever since 1994 when I started surfing the internet, I wondered why domain extensions were limited to .com, .org, .gov or.edu.  Its about time that extensions are expanded.  I see no foreseable negative.

ITS A BRAVE NEW WORLD!!!  

There should never be an amount so onaccessable the average man on the street can not afford it.

Keep It Simple Stupid !

Why doesn't CL get on board, they are the simple people personified.

:-)  

You're saying that ICANN will charge $100,000 for this new top level domain name?

That would be at least 100,000 times more than they charge now for normal domains. Why didn't reference ICANN in your article, aren't they the ones that oversee these things?

Seems high to me, and an unrealistic number, where did you get this number from? Are you grabbing numbers out of the sky? Oh I forgot you're a reporter, you can do that. lol

Interesting tho, that we all might at some point be able to have our own top level domain. I like the idea.

Cheers!

I agree Rick, however no one said you can't use an underscore in the URL. For example; Ricks_Gold.com or .ca ... or for a c00l.wave.com the domain name stays affordable.

The downfall of using an unfamiliar extension is the risk of increase of virus, spam/malware attacks and the likes. Virus/Spam developers now have the ability to create url names which cloak as the real mcoy corporate and financial domain names ie; statefinancial.stocks ... correct if I'm wrong.

The other thing is it's going to take quite a while to get used to these overpriced URLs. Why throw the dollars away, use it for more practical ventures.

Response to Overhyped's Comment:

Unfamiliar extensions do not increase the risk of virus, spam or malware.  This can happen from visiting a .com url. Duh!

Overhyped, here's an idea:  If you favor limiting url extensions, how about favoring a limit to the types of religion one may practice or the brand and make of a car one can buy.

Communism was attempted already in a few parts of the world Overhyped.  It failed.  Don't board a sinking ship !!!

Knowledge is Power!

$ 100,000 for a domain name. ....... kissmy. butt

Oh, and one more thing Overhyped:

The cost of domains in new urls will eventually find equilibrium as do all commodities in a free market society.

Aye, Aye Kapitan Overhyped!

RESPONSE TO KEV'S COMMENT,

Kev, Kev, Kev, sounds like a case of sour grapes.  What does it matter to you whether a domain is $1 or $100,000.  If you wanted your own domain, you would only spend a dollar, right?  I would assume most people would agree with you Kev.  Oh, and Kev, why are you putting down the reporter?  I'm sure she didn't just pull that number out of the sky!  Which leads me to wonder exactly where you pull your ideas and comments from Kev!

Ricky,

If they want to charge that much let em.  Either it will work or they will have to lower their price to get buyers.

Ricky, here's and idea:  Why dont you write to Mercedes, BMW and Lexus and demand that their prices be lowered comparable to Hyundai and Kia.  Best of Luck to ya Ricky!!!  Thats where I would start Ricky.  

How do we protect name recognition and intellectual property rights?  Even with the current options, you can end up with either the wrong site or having to "purchase" the name you already own by copyright.

Is there a need?  it is already so clogged and cluttered that finding any real information is near impossible.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):