Is it fair to analyze Steve Jobs' appearance?
Posted
Jun 11 2008, 01:11 PM
by
Kim Peterson
Rating:
I've been avoiding the ongoing Web chatter over Steve Jobs' health, but the Wall Street Journal has now jumped in and that's going to ratchet up the debate a little bit. After seeing Jobs' keynote speech earlier this week, people are speculating that he may be ill, and the company confirmed to the Journal that Jobs is on antibiotics after coming down with "a common bug" recently.
I can't think of any other CEO whose appearance falls under such scrutiny. Part of this stems from the fact that Jobs was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer four years ago and underwent surgery to treat it. Apple didn't disclose this to shareholders until later, stirring up some controversy because some felt this should have been made public earlier.
Is it any of our business? It seems invasive and kind of rude to be talking about the man's health. But at the same time, shareholders are understandably watchful over their investment, and any investment in Apple is an investment in Jobs. Without him, the company -- and its stock price -- would fall.
Here's a one-minute video summary of Jobs' keynote, in case you missed it. Apple shares, by the way, are down 2% today to $181.93.
Related reading:
Apple's big iPhone news
Answering your iPhone questions
Preposterous but true: Apple's worth more than Citigroup