Australia's sunny solution to energy crisis - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Australia's sunny solution to energy crisis

Posted Jun 05 2008, 04:38 AM by Jon Markman
Rating:

One of the most awesome things about the world energy shortage is that it has encouraged every wingnut science professor, inventor, entrepreneur and lawmaker with an ounce of moonbeam in their veins to announce a wacky solution. Maybe they can all generate heat just by making us laugh. Where is Rube Goldberg when we really need him?

So as my tip of the hat to World Environment Day – which is June 5, by the way – I would like to call your attention to my new column on solar thermal energy, and my favorite idea, which comes courtesy of the Australian National  University.

Australia, you have to understand first, is one of the world’s largest exporters of coal, oil, natural gas and uranium. It’s like a floating strip mine which every resource-hungry nation of the world is doing its best to hollow out. Yet folks there are worried that once the last piece of fossil fuel is carved from of the island, it’ll have nothing left but crocodile tears and a few large cans of beer. So it has embarked on the goal of setting up sunshine as its next bumper crop.

The Aussies’ new project is to build the world’s largest solar parabolic dish – at 5,400 square feet, it’s the size of a city block – that’s composed of 424 mirrored panels. So far, that’s not such a big deal, as there are several giant dishes, or solar “concentrators,” these days in California and Nevada which take reflections from an array of heliostats and use the heat generated to boil a liquid into bursts of steam that turn a turbine and generate electricity. 

That’s too easy for the Australians. Instead, the scientist behind this idea, professor Keith Lovegrove,  has plans to separately have farmers grow thousands of tons of salt water algae, which he says produce 40 times more biomass than food crops per acre. Once harvested, he would use the power of the solar concentrator to “gasify” them at 1,292 degrees Farenheit in giant pressure cookers. He says the resulting methane gas would be processed into a form of methanol that can, in turn, power up electricity turbines.

You have to admire these folks for thinking big, if nothing else. But don't count on powering your latte with electrons born from sun-smoked Ausssie algae anytime real soon. While you're waiting, read more about Lovegrove and see some pictures here at the blog beyondzeroemissions.org  and check out this pdf that illuminates the subject. The United States has investigated making biodiesel from algae. Read about it here. Of course the algae people have their own blog, titled Algaetobioenergy.com.

Comments

 

This process does seem to be less efficient over just using the energy to boil water to run the turbines.  They'll lose 30'% of the energy in burning the methane.  

Forgot solar stocks, the best renewable energy in Australia is Wind. The best play for this Babcock and Brown Wind Partners (BBW.AX). I wrote more about this here if you want a detailed review.

www.financeviewpoint.com/.../this-will-blow-you-awaybabock-and-brown.html

Despite all the market  headwinds (no pun intended), this stock is holding its own and is fully backed by its parent Babacock and Brown.

Yes, there is some loss, but the advantage is in storage and transport or even export of the energy. The ability to do this eliminates the need to duplicate the generation capacity with a non solar source as backup. Nothing is a perfect fits all solution. As much direct use of solar thermal generation as possible is ideal, but this gets you beyond that to solar based fuels for vehicles, and reliabilty.

I agree with A ChemE.  It would probably just be more effecient to use the solar energy and/or the algae energy directly.  It's still a fun idea, but not totally practical.

Eric -- great point. this energy needs to be transportable and storable. there are people who say they can store the solar energy for 20 hours in molten salt, but the reality is that it's probably only like 8 hours. if you can covert the energy to natural gas, then it's something that's more easily transported over long distances.

If  Thomas Edison listened to the nay sayers we would still be using gas lights and whale oil. I say go for it, if it works great if not may be it will lead to something else that does work better.

The "world's largest"??? 5,400 square feet, the size of a city block???

5,400 square feet is the size of a large house or a lot approx. 74' x 74'. When people talk about the "Energy Crisis" the public is skeptical already about truth vs. fiction. Get the facts straight.

In terms of greenhouse gasses, wouldn't creating and burning methane be more deleterious than just using the solar energy to produce electricity ala your prior article?  Or, if one needs storable energy, why not use the solar energy to create electricity to be used to electrolyze water to create hydrogen that can be stored, shipped, and used as fuel?  

$4.40 max per gallon of biodiesel from algae farms according to the DOE report, that's about where we're at now with patroleum based.    Just goes to show how forward thinking the Carter Administration was in creating the energy source and how short term/ short sighted every administration since has been in giving in to big oil, arabs and ignorant americans

That's $4.40 in 1970's dollars.  In 2008 it would cost much more than $4.40.  Talk about being short sighted.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):