$9 to rent an HD movie on demand? - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

$9 to rent an HD movie on demand?

Posted May 16 2008, 01:56 PM by Kim Peterson
Rating:
Filed under: ,

People will pay between $7 and $9 to rent HD movies-on-demand that come out the same day as DVDs, according to consulting firm Oliver Wyman. Right now, movies generally hit DVD first before releasing on-demand. Changing that formula would lead consumers to pay for three more movies a year, the firm said, adding $5 billion to the $50 billion spent on movies annually in the U.S.

Even a $7 rental seems too pricey to me, unless you're talking about some jaw-droppingly amazing movie that absolutely must be watched in high-definition. Despite its slightly outrageous numbers, the report touches on a fact that movie studios have clued into for a while now: video-on-demand is smoking hot, and doesn't deserve its second-tier status.

Time Warner figured that out, and this year is putting all its films on video-on-demand the same day they come out on DVD. The margins from on-demand movies hits 60% to 70%, execs said, compared with 20% to 30% for DVD rentals. "It's very good for the film companies," CEO Jeff Bewkes said during the company's Q1 earnings call.

Comcast's video-on-demand offerings used to be as pathetic as the 99-cent VHS bin at the video store. But its library now stands at 10,000 titles, with an increasing number of movies available the same day as the DVD release. The service gets about 250 million views a month.

So where are the VOD investment opportunities? The list of companies making plays in this business is long, and includes telecom carriers, cable companies and equipment vendors. Motorola and Cisco are deeply invested in the equipment piece of the puzzle. The six largest cable operators have joined forces to make it easier to advertise through VOD. Netflix, Amazon, Blockbuster, TiVo and Apple have introduced or are developing on-demand services.

A third of U.S. homes can access on-demand video, and analysts are making big-money projections for the future of the business. The global VOD market will hit $11.4 billion by 2011, according to the Informa research firm. And though North America will have 27% of the total subscribers, it will contribute 46% of the overall revenue.

 

Comments

 

VOD is Hollywood's wet dream, it solves the piracy problem and lowers production costs. People however, won't ever spend 7 to 9 dollars, Oliver Wyman is just telling hollywood what they want to hear. Historically Americans are a tactile people, they want to own something (notice how everyone wants a "backup" of their TIVO videos?)

VOD will always be second tier...

I guess this just sums up the I WANT IT NOW mentality.  I am surprised that few people mentioned the best resource for movies - the LIBRARY - Our library system  has all the new releases available and I can reserve the movies online, keep them for 5 DAYS and PAY NOTHING.  I put it into my regular schedule stop by the library on Wed. pick up the maximum allowed to borrow and I am never lacking for a movie selection on the weekend.  Oh and if I do forget to return the late fee is $1.  

WHAT?!?!  I won't pay to go to the theater (at those prices; because they don't pause so you can use the restroom).  Why would I pay that much for something that, in the end, I will not own?  Obviously these idiots haven't watched the financial forecasts.  We are surrounded by MORONS!!!!  HELP!!!

I already think movie rentals are too expensive at $4-5 a video.....

If I'm spending that much for a movie, I want to own it, not rent it from a multi-billion dollar corporation that makes almost 100% profit per rental.

On a tangent, this VOD concept also shows why video discs aren't obsolete: why should I spend so much to download films to a hard drive that could crash and delete my entire library? VOD advocates claim that I would theoretically be "allowed" to download the films I own for free again, but do you realize how long it would take to restore a large film collection?

Do they just hate all of us movie fans?  Is it not enough that they charge us an arm and a leg  when we go to the movies?  HBO charging $80 for a 12 episode season when you want to purchase it on DVD's?

Whatever these execs are smoking, could you please pass it to me, 'cause it must be some good s#%it!

People need to read more and/or get outdoors and enjoy mother nature instead of sitting on their be-hinds and gaining weight etc., there's nothing on TV you and I haven't seen 100 times already! Start making these companies GO BROKE by not watching the TV anymore! It's the only way they'll learn not to overcharge us! Sorry but it is what it is!

WHEN YOU RENT ON DEMAND YOU CAN PUT IT ON YOUR DVR AND STORE A FEW HUNDRED MOVIES CHEAPER THAN BUYING A $20 MOVIE AND WATCHING IT 2 TIMES A YEAR.

Redbox is the only way to go.  99 cents plus tax is worth it.

Where was this study done - in Oliver Wyman's basement???  Have they not learned anything from the defunct video business?? For double, even triple the $$$, most people would rather purchase them...

He needs to get off his a$$ and get into the real world...

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):