Exxon: The world's 18th-largest economy? - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Exxon: The world's 18th-largest economy?

Posted Apr 28 2008, 07:01 PM by Charley Blaine
Rating:
Filed under: ,

Earnings from Royal Dutch Shell and BP today just about guarantee that ExxonMobil is going to report some truly gaudy first-quarter revenue and profits on Thursday.

And they're only going to get bigger as the year rolls along. So big, in fact, that Exxon's revenue by the end of the year may be greater than the gross domestic product of Sweden, the world's 18th-largest economy.

Here's how the numbers could work:

Wall Street is expecting the oil giant to report $121 billion in revenue for the quarter, about 40% higher than a year ago. But BP reported a 44% revenue increase to $89 billion, and Royal Dutch Shell reported a 56% revenue gain to $114 billion.

In the first quarter of 2007, crude oil averaged $58.07 a barrel. In the first quarter of 2008, it averaged about $97 a barrel, a 67% change. If Exxon simply sold what it sold a year ago at this year's prices, it's possible to see revenue hit $130 billion. That would be larger than the gross domestic product of New Zealand in 2007. One analyst contacted by BusinessWeek thinks it could hit $135 billion. (By the way, Shell's revenue was roughly the size of the gross domestic product of Egypt.) 

Plus, Exxon will get a boost for both revenue and profit from converting sales outside the United States back into dollars. Remember, the dollar is down.

Meanwhile, net income should be north of $12 billion, or $2.11 a share. If it hits $13 billion, that would be as large as the gross domestic product of, say, Brunei. That's the oil-rich nation on the island of Borneo whose sultan, Haji Hassanal Bolkiah, according to Forbes magazine, is worth at least $20 billion.

Now, how does Exxon get to be the size of Sweden's economy? Let's say first-quarter revenue comes in at $130 billion when crude oil averaged more than $97 a barrel. So far in April, crude has averaged $112 a barrel and looks like it will soon top $120. So, it's possible Exxon's revenue for the second quarter could be $140 billion, maybe more. If it hits $150 billion, that would be bigger than the GDP of the Philippines.

Four quarters of numbers like that would mean the company could gross $480 million -- more than the GDP of Sweden and slightly less than No. 17, Turkey. In fact, Wall Street analysts now expect Exxon's revenue to top $550 billion in both 2008 and 2009.

If you're purely interested in the money, you should be thrilled. But not everyone is interested in just the money.

Descendants of oil baron John D. Rockefeller, who in the 19th century put together what would become Exxon, want the company to bar the chief executive officer from serving as chairman so management can't delay action on climate change. Family members will announce their support on Wednesday for a shareholder resolution to split the positions. The proposal won support of 40% of shareholders in 2007 and 34.3% of shareholders in 2006.

Exxon opposes the proposal.

Comments

 

It is not as though Exxon pays a huge dividend to  it's sharehoder's. It is the worse dividend payer of all the blue chips I own.

Why must everyone pick on Exxon?  Oh, it's becasue you do not understand Economics.  Look at the "bottom line", Exxon is making a 10% Pretax Profit ($12B Pretax divided by $ 121B in Sales).  If gas wer e$ 2 a gallon and Exxon was genereating revenue of $ 60B, then their Profit would be only $ 6B.  Would that make all of you feel better?

Now the drug company's are mostly in the 20% Profit range but nobody's dogging them right now. Which do you NEED more, your meds or that tank of gas? So who's really doing the gouging??

The gas companies have stock in the car companies to make money. Just like you and I. So there is no good reason to make cars go longer on a tank of gas. Because if they do one of the cars makers biggest investors will lose money.(gas company).  Why can we fig. out how to make computers so small we can not use them but cars have the same MPG that they did 10 years ago? Because THEY don't want to make a  car that is a good size and can get 50-75 miles to the gallon.

I agree with Bob Neidow, Hate the price, but Exxon has been good to me.

price of fuel is killing this country,just go to the store and try to buy food for your familly for a week and compare this to about 6 momths ago.bush isn,t going to do any thing cause there oil familly

I have no problem with companies making a profit but to do so and then in the next breath complain they are making enough is down right crinimal. Sure the price of everything goes up but at the rate crude is going every year we pay an average increas of a dollar. We know come spring the price sky rockets and the levels off until the holidays the increase. If we allow this to continue then we are in for a rough and rocky time.

Only money will force us to clean up our act. When dirty energy cost more than green energy, we'll change.

The government should place a 10% net profit cap on them.

Why are we still paying for higher oil price if these companies profits is so high...Theres got to be a limit to ALL giant companies and have the goverment control oil prices and don't let it passes $100.00 a barel, we must STOP these oil companies making Big profits and major losses to the economy strenght..Lets vote for a new Goverment statue..Its called: "GOCC" "Goverment Oil Control Center"..contact me at oneill1425@yahoo.com for more further details.

Thank you, Bob Neidow: finally, a comment that makes sense! The rest of you guys, dump your suv's and get smaller vehicles. The price of oil is set by the market and should go down if consumption is drastically reduced.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):