Why Wall Street hates Starbucks - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Why Wall Street hates Starbucks

Posted Mar 30 2008, 08:26 PM by Douglas McIntyre
Rating:
Filed under: , ,

Starbucks has been a disappointment recently. Same-store sales in the U.S. slowed over the last couple of quarters. The company pushed down its guidance. Founder Howard Schultz kicked out his CEO and took over.

In late 2006, Starbucks traded over $40. It is well below that now -- under $18 on most days.

Right as the stock peaked, then-CEO Jim Donald made the audacious statement that the company would eventually have 40,000 stores. On the day he said that Starbucks had 12,440 stores. Looking back, it is almost certain the his prediction had no chance of becoming a reality. But, the $40 share price had gone to his head. He had become delirious with success.

Schultz and company has to live with echos of that forecast, and they will have to for some time. (For more about Starbucks' troubles, read this and this and this.)

It is not unlike a statement made by AMD in the middle of 2006. It would end up with 40% of the market for server chips by mid-2009. AMD was trading at $36 or so when the company made that prediction. Since then larger rival Intel has beaten it like a red-headed mule. AMD is now a $6 stock and that is not likely to get better. It has about 20% of the server market.

Outsiders say that Wall Street doesn't have a long memory. That may be true in some cases, but it does tend to remember the big promises from big companies. Better to keep your mouth shut and let the numbers speak for themselves.

Comments

 

we are headed back to the days where we put a cup under hot tap water and stir in folgers instant coffee with a little low fat milk and natural sugar

Starbucks relied on those stupids who paid $5 for a cup of coffee and walked around showing off their wealth and stupidity. While economy was good, people were willing to pay for such ridiculous price. Now, who wants to do that. Are we stupid or what?

starbucks does not support the army, so I won't support them.

I'm glad I don't drink coffee!!

Not only is the coffee expensive, but it comes in one flavor: burnt. That's how they got you fools to buy flavored coffee!

i still enjoy starbucks,they have excellent coffee and a good place to enjoy it first thing in the morning.not to mention the expresso rocks,triple shot is awsome.i hope that they do get everything turned around and get there shops b ack up to par.i am not going to complain about paying that extra dollar for a gallon of gas because i have my choice to walk if i wanted to,so with that i do not paying that extra dollar for coffee or else i would make it at home.

Although I have certainly drunk my share of Starbucks cooffee (coffe of the day only, not the frou-frou drinks), I always thought it was bitter, overpriced and, as more than one person has said, its appeal is more about carrying around the cup than about what's in it.  

I can afford Starbucks 20 times a day, but I go to where the best coffee in the world is and always ahs been: 7-11!

I'm still nursing my Starbucks latte.  Paid about $4 for it.  I should break even on my coffee by about 2010.

I drink the plain old coffee of the week from Starbucks.  I was not a coffee drinker until this stuff.  What do they put in it?  I guess I like it for the same reasons I like Guinness.  It is full flavored, bitter, with a strong roasted flavor.  I have not found another coffee that is close.  Everything else has no flavor.

Hey, they make a nice product. Their success hasn't been strictly the result of image-concious, tasteless yuppies. Feel free to say "I told you so" now that they're struggling a bit, but don't expect them to fall too far. You ever try Dunkin' Donuts coffee?

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):