DirecTV finally offering video-on-demand - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

DirecTV finally offering video-on-demand

Posted Mar 13 2008, 03:18 PM by Kim Peterson
Rating:
Filed under: , ,

DirecTV is finally going to offer a video-on-demand service. About time, too. Comcast and other companies are light-years ahead in this area, and on-demand is becoming a required feature for some consumers these days.

It's taken DirecTV this long because, as a satellite provider, it broadcasts a one-way signal. The technology doesn't allow for the two-way conversation that an interactive service like on-demand uses. DirecTV is going to work around this using broadband connections and digital video recorder (DVR) technology, according to the WSJ.

DirecTV shares are up nearly 1% on the news today to $25.21. The project is expected to launch in the second quarter.

The way it's going to work is that DirecTV will automatially send some movies to customers' DVRs for ordering. Television programs and other movies will be streamed over the Internet to the customers' set-top boxes. So it's not exactly "true" on-demand, but it'll do.

What if you don't want the movies DirecTV chooses taking up space on your DVR? DirecTV says that most of its 3,000 on-demand titles will be streamed online, and the videos that do get to your DVR will sit in space that isn't available to customers anyway. (Then what is that space there for, I wonder?)

Here's what people are saying about today's news:

Broadband Reports: "As we've stated repeatedly, this particular launch will be one to watch -- given you've got a satellite provider suddenly using a competitor's bandwidth to deliver high-definition content -- something that speaks strongly to the debate over a neutral 'Net."

Paid Content: "Think back to Cablevision’s maligned effort to allow viewers to use remote servers as a DVR, still being fought over in court. The main difference: it’s all stored on the user’s DVR, not a remote server. Still, some of it is copied onto the DVRs by the provider without user choice, one of the issues used to rule against Cablevision in U.S. District Court last year."

Silicon Alley Insider: "Will it dramatically boost revenues? Unlikely. Cable companies have hoped for years that on-demand programming would juice sales, but it's not happening. " 

Shelly Palmer: "It remains to be seen if DirecTV’s system can stream high-quality films without buffering delays, stuttering video and dropped connections. Stay tuned - this is a high-profile experiment in content delivery."

Blogging Stocks: "Three well-funded competitors trying to get market share usually leads to a price war. Getting "on demand" TV services is probably about to get much cheaper." 

Disclosures: I don't own shares of any companies mentioned in this post. And while Microsoft owns this blog, Microsoft does not control, censor or otherwise have any editorial influence over what I write. 

Comments

 

I remember seeing a page on Netflicks a year or so ago, which was taken down in less than a day saying that they made a deal with DirecTV to start an on demand service.  What ever happened with that?

I would like to see the goverment commission that started this digital world

   put a stop to all companies that receive the Over The AIR signal free...

  then sell it to thier customers for 5 - 20 dollars extra for HD signal !

  HDTV is broadcast free from the TV broadcast stations , so why doesn't

     someone stop this Monopoly .  Also see dtv.gov   rules !?$

Directv  needs to connect up to local NBC 25 out of Hagerstown, Md.//Dish Network has and this has provided 100,000 new customers for Dish Network//

I would like to swith to Directv//Only waiting until they will provide local NBC 25//

When Comcast comes and it is now both in W.Va and Frederick,Md. there will be no need for Direct or Dishnet work//For they provide competive pricing for all three products//local channel 25//wide variety of satilite coverage channels and internet service//    

I would like to see a day when we pay the cable/satellite provider only for the service, and not the channel. The cost of just television entertainment is getting a little overpriced just to watch commercials most of the time. They pass a lot of cost from the network channel (e.g. ESPN, CNN) on to customers, and shopping channels pay the cable/satellite company for carrying them.

We shouldn't have to pay extra to have a CNN type channel if it's not wanted. Just pay for service and let commercials pay for everything for the network and then they could offer every channel and not worry about cost. Thank you.

what about areas with no DSL or cable? what will happen to us?

DSL snobs like Chris kill me. Some people LIKE the consistancy of a dedicated line versus the variable performance ofshared broadband resources. They dont say "up to" on thier speed claims for nothing. Enjoy it while your there are not enough people on your leg to bring the speed down, and stop believing those stupid commmercials! Anyway, they never specified DSL anyway, the said broadband, but any chance to parrot a commercial is a good one I guess.

Anyway, DirecTV has so much content as it is, I really doubt this will make or break them. I have had it since 1996, and I dont have to wait for new channels, I dont have to wonder if this channel or that channel is really all digital, and I dont have to go with out being able to follow whatever tema in any major sport every game, the pay per view offers 1/2 hour increment starting times for the major movies, and when I move, my TV content does not change.

Different strokes I guess.

I've got Dish Network programming that I signed on for over a year ago.  They have been doing this in my home since day one.  

However, I don't use the service.  They want me to pay $4.99 for an on-demand movie that is loaded on my hard drive, which is a higher price than ordering something out of the PPV selections.  I'll typically hit the IPPV movies rather than finding something in the on-demand section of my receiver.

Point is, DirecTV isn't doing something new with this.  It's a service that has already been around and people have been ignoring it on other dish providers already for some time.

I'm confused...I am a DirecTV customer for years (after a jaunt to Comcast which was stupid)...what is the difference between PPV movies and Video on Demand?  

(I don't do PPV anyhow or when I was w/Comcast did do VOD either).  

Just asking?

Why can ANY of the companies allow the customer to design their own channel lineups?   Flat fee for channel packages and then the customer can choose which ones that they want.

Wrong. I have Comcast but I do not receive On Demand. I pay for it but am unable to access it.

I live in rural Iowa,  not too many options for TV service or high speed internet, yea watching the corn grow just doesn't cut it.  VOD would would be a welcome option.  I do agree with Jon, most people that live around me either have dial up or internet via one of the satellite providers.  I'm limited on the amount of down load I can receive per month.  VOD wouldn't be an option for me.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):