Apple on pace to become top music seller - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Apple on pace to become top music seller

Posted Feb 27 2008, 09:53 AM by Kim Peterson
Rating:
Filed under: , , ,

Apple's iTunes store has surpassed Best Buy to become the #2 music retailer in the country, second only to Wal-Mart in sales. And an analyst from the NPD Group, which tracks these sorts of things, said that Apple is on track to catch Wal-Mart this year.

Apple shares dipped less than a percentage point yesterday to close at $119.15. Best Buy shares rose 3% to $46.50, and Wal-Mart shares rose 2% to $51.40.

This news says much about the way we consume music. NPD notes that 1 million people stopped buying CDs last year, a trend most apparent in young people. In 2007, 48% of teens didn't buy a single CD -- up from 38% in 2006. So retailers like Wal-Mart, Best Buy and Target -- who mainly sell physical CDs -- are going to see music sales slide.

But what does the news say about Apple? Is the rise to No. 2 a result of its own sales savvy, or is iTunes the lucky beneficiary of the CD's decline? A closer look at the numbers sheds a little more light.

Apple said today it has sold 4 billion songs on iTunes. It hit the 3 billion song mark on July 31 of last year, so it took about seven months for iTunes to sell 1 billion songs. But guess what -- it took seven months to sell the previous billion songs (from 2 billion to 3 billion). The Los Angeles Times reads into these numbers and figures that people are buying less music than they used to. I'm not so sure. The only thing you can get from these numbers is that iTunes music sales have flattened. People could still be buying music but from other sources, such as Amazon's MP3 store.

Then there's the piracy angle. NPD says that 19 percent of U.S. Internet users were active on peer-to-peer file sharing networks last year, and that music sharing grew aggressively among teens. While the number of people on those networks appears to have hit a plateau, the number of files each user downloaded increased. 

In fact, only 10% of the music acquired in the U.S. last year was downloaded legally, through iTunes or another online music retailer. Nearly 30 million people bought music legally -- 5 million more than in 2006 -- and many of those were in the 36-to-50 age group

So Apple's music sales are flat, and illegal song-swapping continues unabated. Amazon and other competitors are moving in as well. Analysts are starting to suspect iPod saturation.

So go ahead and pat yourself on the back, Apple, but watch out. In the music business, #2 isn't what it used to be.

Comments

 

I agree with Nicholas' comment about the music and the commercial industry as a whole.  If the large record companies refrain from churning and spitting out carbon copy artists and music maybe people would do less file sharing and would pony up some money.  I hope that the large music industry and those coporate stooges go away.  It would be great to musicians and bands have the ability to do their own sales via internet and reap the financial rewards which may just make music more affordable for us as consumers as well.

4 billion songs @ a buck a song equals $4B in revenue. The question is how much margin is there in the iTunes distribution model which impacts Apple's bottom line and share holder value? i.e. are they making any money?

I agree with the bad music being made today.  It really isn't music at all and many artists have nerve even claiming it is so.  Nothing but thumpty thump.  Boring and unoriginal!  Bring back the good old early days when FM was young.  It used to be exciting getting new music.  We used to rush out and buy albums as soon as they hit the streets.  Only once in a great while does anything good come out worth buying now.  So why wouldn't you pirate music.  Who would want to pay anything for what is available today.

Jack- there is pop and then there is Pop.  American popular music is garbage with a very few exceptions. There is a ton of very worthy "Pop" being made in Europe and Latin America.  

There is alot to be said for today's music - there was alot of crap made in past decades also - its just wasn't mass produced and liscensed and rammed down our ears on a daily basis.   only a few dozen artists from each generation ever really survive the test of time, and today will be no different.

iTunes is much more than music now days, and its very hard to compare stores and online sales, it’s a totally different marketing/demographic etc…  iPod saturation?? Well what do you expect when they own 85% of the market, you can only go so far (100%) I find that iTunes has a very original and “offbeat” selection of music that I can’t always find in the stores. Plus its Apple, its iTunes, what can go wrong?

Will dat make me a gazillionaire? Or will it simply take monet outta my pocket, for my superfluous and pathetic entertainment?

I listen to the internet radio (like www.pandora.com which I setup to play only (mostly) music I like to hear) and it actually exposes me to the music I like but have never heard (new artists included) and if i really like it I do buy CDs or tracks, but not through iTune (even though pandora makes it convenient to buy it through there)

I'm in my early 40's and I already have everything I want musically. I am very disapointed in the lack of musical tallent today... Britney Spears? gimmie a break !!! Creating new bands comparable to powerhouses like Led Zeppelin, The Stones and The Beatles etc is, in my opinion, the only way to help the music industry for the long term.  It's pretty sad when I listen to todays music and think to myself wow this stuff makes Michael Jackson and Prince sound good.

Classic rock forever

First of all there may be a lack of musical talent today, which seems to be spurred by the emergence of crap, oh sorry that should say rap.  But there still exists artists that put forth tremendous talent and effort to produce good music.  The problem is that they are often times overshadowed by what is currently considered "hot" music (i.e. rap).  But in regards to your comments about the Beatles, the Stones and Led Zepplin, I would prefer to have a more positive musical influence than to have my daughter listen to music that was fueled by substance abuse, low morals and questionable talent at best.

what this means that we should save our money then spending on music.

I don't know where you guys are getting your music, but the stuff I have from Amazon is crystal clear. I love the way they are going now. The music is unprotected, so I can back it up on a disk and put it on any mp3 player. I like that I can pick and choose which music to buy, I hated paying for 15 songs, just to get 2 I wanted. The days of CD oppression are coming to an end. :-) I find it funny that Apple got beaten to the punch by Amazon for low cost DRM music. Yay for progress.

BTW, MP3 players are not that costly now. It only costs if you get an Ipod, or one of the other super expencive players. MP3's are the wav of the future. (Pun intended)

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):