Apple on pace to become top music seller - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Apple on pace to become top music seller

Posted Feb 27 2008, 09:53 AM by Kim Peterson
Rating:
Filed under: , , ,

Apple's iTunes store has surpassed Best Buy to become the #2 music retailer in the country, second only to Wal-Mart in sales. And an analyst from the NPD Group, which tracks these sorts of things, said that Apple is on track to catch Wal-Mart this year.

Apple shares dipped less than a percentage point yesterday to close at $119.15. Best Buy shares rose 3% to $46.50, and Wal-Mart shares rose 2% to $51.40.

This news says much about the way we consume music. NPD notes that 1 million people stopped buying CDs last year, a trend most apparent in young people. In 2007, 48% of teens didn't buy a single CD -- up from 38% in 2006. So retailers like Wal-Mart, Best Buy and Target -- who mainly sell physical CDs -- are going to see music sales slide.

But what does the news say about Apple? Is the rise to No. 2 a result of its own sales savvy, or is iTunes the lucky beneficiary of the CD's decline? A closer look at the numbers sheds a little more light.

Apple said today it has sold 4 billion songs on iTunes. It hit the 3 billion song mark on July 31 of last year, so it took about seven months for iTunes to sell 1 billion songs. But guess what -- it took seven months to sell the previous billion songs (from 2 billion to 3 billion). The Los Angeles Times reads into these numbers and figures that people are buying less music than they used to. I'm not so sure. The only thing you can get from these numbers is that iTunes music sales have flattened. People could still be buying music but from other sources, such as Amazon's MP3 store.

Then there's the piracy angle. NPD says that 19 percent of U.S. Internet users were active on peer-to-peer file sharing networks last year, and that music sharing grew aggressively among teens. While the number of people on those networks appears to have hit a plateau, the number of files each user downloaded increased. 

In fact, only 10% of the music acquired in the U.S. last year was downloaded legally, through iTunes or another online music retailer. Nearly 30 million people bought music legally -- 5 million more than in 2006 -- and many of those were in the 36-to-50 age group

So Apple's music sales are flat, and illegal song-swapping continues unabated. Amazon and other competitors are moving in as well. Analysts are starting to suspect iPod saturation.

So go ahead and pat yourself on the back, Apple, but watch out. In the music business, #2 isn't what it used to be.

Comments

 

glad to see alot of the older generation here sticking up for buying actual CDs! Unfortunately, the majority of the youth of today don't care about supporting artists, or are even true music fans. They only download singles they hear on the radio or on music videos, and never hear the full albums! They don't what the term "B-sides" means, or find hidden tracks on CDs, etc. I agree, MP3s are a pain to rip, burn, copy, paste, plug in, etc! Hell, I just want to slap in a CD and press play!

The music industry screwed themselves in the late 90s with price gouging.  $21 for a new hit pop CD was and is ludicrous. Albums should have stayed at about $10 which is the absolute maximum people want to pay for music.  At least now they can get them for that price online.   But if you go into a target or best buy or borders, a CD is still about 14 bucks at the lowest end for anything worth listening two - and that's about 50 percent more than what anyone will pay.  Its not like it costs more than a nickel a unit to press and ship those coasters anyway.  

Some notes:

1. Corporate retailers shouldn't make money off music, musicians should.

2. Musicians should make the bulk of their money by constant touring. If they can't do that, they have no business being in the industry.

3. There are WAY too many people calling themselves "musicians."

4. Sooner or later, the music industry will learn that like any other creative industry -  mass produced digitally distributed content is only worth the advertising dollars you can make by putting ads next to it.  The era of retail liscensing is rapidly coming to an END.

I do not want to hear a single I want to hear a complete album from start to finish. I hardly ever listen to the radio. And yes I want to hold the product in my hand, look at the pictures, read words, see who wrote and produced etc.. We heard the big hype about prices coming down a couple of years ago but never saw that at the cash register. What we did see was albums shrinking from 60-70 minutes down to about 39 minutes. And they want the same price if not more. The labels are killing the music industry themselves. I will continue to buy as long as they produce quality for the money, which is getting pretty hard these days. Takes research.

No, the real hassale is having to physically drive through traffic, to a store, to get a cd, only to find that they are sold out or don't carry them. I'm 19 and can tell you that my generation is very computer savvy. Downloading music is easy and affordable for us. Using Itunes (unlike Limewire) isn't stealing and unlike my mother who spends hours trying to figure out the computer and Ipod, I can have any song I want in less than a minute.

-Oh and you don't lose sound quality with downloads. I don't know what product you are using but "digitally enhanced" sound is all the rage right now. Plus, sound quality isn't jeopardized like it is with scratched cds or cd players.

Why would you spend money on music as there are lots of place it is available to free.......

Here's the dealio...people were sharing music when cds were popular to...favorite mixes? and even way far back with cassette tapes...recording from the radio and making your favorite mix tape to give to a friend. So seriously this whole sharing music thing is a big blown up hoax. We all did it at some point, maybe not dling, but we sure did enjoy those mixes.

I swear these compnies are whining and moaning because their wide margin of profit is , well, less wide?? Have you heard of any major recording artist not being able to buy their bentley because of online piracy. Get off that horse already.

Personally I love the flexibility that mp3's provide and any other restrictions on my purchased music will not be tolerated and you shouldn't have to either. If you pay for it, you should be able to put it in your work's computer, mp3 player (1's and 2nd) as well as your little brothers computer if you so wish without having to pay extra like other pay per song sites do with their proprietary formats. (because they deem it's a luxury to be flexible with your music library, what croc!)

Give customers the flexibility of mp3's at a reasonoable price and I am willing to bet you that the limewire's and kazaa's will dwindle down on their own. But so long as you remain on your high horse of "we're not as rich as we once were" you'll get little consumer sympathy.

Some people like typewriters better than computers. Same as some people like having CD's more than MP3s, and MP3 Players. In general, people no longer support better format for music, ie. people are more than willing to buy the next gen Video game system, but haven't considered buying DVD-music or SuperCD formats. Most people don't care much about quality. I prefer having all of music collection in a device the size of my cell phone than a bunch CDs, CD cases, worthless panphlets. In my eye they waste paper, plastic, and gas transporting all that junk. I wish online music would be cheaper considering so many of the manufactorying, printing and transportation cost are out of equation, also, many independants artisti can dristribute their music. Screw walmart and top-40 (and censored music)

This is how the future will look like ,not only music but also movies, you'll have ability to download them over internet...and I think every TV will be connected to the internet this way, so who cares about ..blue-ray or Dvd-audio you'll download your media at higher rate to achieve higher stadard ,at the higher cost of course, software may be still availiable but eventually will disapair........

i have an ipod touch 16gb and i love it i agree with other post music nowadays isnt really good the reason i like itunes is you can buy songs off  albums at 99 cents per that you like why spend 12-17 bucks on a cd when it has 13 songs 4 skits intro and outro when you will only listen to 6 songs im tired of artist putting fillers on cd's just to have enough songs also when an artist that i really like drops a cd i will go buy it and support the artist the last cd i bought was jay-z american gangster

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):