Facebook's mea culpa comes at last - Top Stocks Blog: Talk about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day – MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

Facebook's mea culpa comes at last

Posted Dec 06 2007, 12:16 AM by Kim Peterson
Filed under:
Rating:

The Facebook debacle-in-the-making may have peaked today, now that founder Mark Zuckerberg has come out of hiding and apologized. To quickly recap: The social networking upstart rolled out an advertising push that was so invasive and abusive that 50,000 members signed a petition to protest the move. The ad program, called Beacon, ushered in a tidal wave of bad publicity for the company. Read my last post for more on Beacon.

Zuckerberg was nowhere to be found as the PR crisis ballooned. Today, his cup of contrition runneth over. He posts:

"We've made a lot of mistakes building this feature, but we've made even more with how we've handled them. We simply did a bad job with this release, and I apologize for it. While I am disappointed with our mistakes, we appreciate all the feedback we have received from our users."

He's saying all the right things, but the apology just sounds unconvincing. Like it's been picked apart and reassembled by an army of PR people and lawyers. Zuckerberg should have given us the real deal.

He also announced that Facebook will now let users turn off Beacon completely. But take note that everyone remains a part of Beacon unless they actively turn it off. In other words, this is an opt-out system, and not the opt-in version that privacy advocates are calling for.

The entire tech blogosphere seems to be discussing this in detail. Here's a sampling:

Fake Steve Jobs: "The smarmy fake apology is not at all reassuring and seems to have been written by PR people who were trying to imitate a 23-year-old kid who's speaking from the heart and trying to sound all sheepish and aw-shucks -- except the flacks can't do it because they're as insincere and stage-managed as as the Facebook guys." 

Mathew Ingram: "As nice as it might be to see Mark taking the hit and apologizing, however, you have to wonder: how many more times are they going to get whacked for similar ventures?"

Om Malik: "I think they tried to push the limits, and got some push back, and that’s that. Regardless, had people not contacted them, as Zuckerberg puts it, they would have gotten away with it." 

Dave McClure: "Fact of the matter: most of this *** just doesn't matter to most FB users.  it might be a PR screwup, but as long as the userbase doesn't have a negative reaction, eventually the advertisers won't give a damn." 

BoomTown: "This kind of thing can turn into death by a thousand cuts for a company, if they are not careful and don’t put the right kind of leadership in place with enough judgment to avoid this kind of mess." 

 

 

Comments

 

Am I the only one who thinks that FB should be allowed to sell a certain amount of advertising information?  I base this belief on the plain fact that FB is FREE to users.  This wonderful app has brought bizarre levels of joy to people reconnecting with old friends and making new ones.  And they paid NOTHING for it.  Why do we feel so entitled as a culture that we think people should provide these kinds of services without having to pay (in one way or another).  Targetted ads are fine.  It is un-targetted ads that cause annoyance.  FB was, arguably, doing the former.

(and I say all this as a committed socialist).

Why should you have to PAY to connect with people? Hello, that's FREE. Walk outside do something nice for someone. FB is helping to take the human connections we need out of the world.

I totally disagree with paying, for FB. Ads, whatever, ignore em. We've all grown up with commericals 24/7.  I hate FB, and the more I hear about it, the more I dislike it.

More Rational:

Off point.  If you don't like FB then dont obtain a profile.  My comments were limited to those people who take advantage of FB and don't realise what they are getting for free.  I personallty use my profile to keep in contact with people on all the continents that I have met through school or work.  I would gladly pay an annual fee for this app.  Nothing crazy,  mind you, but I recognize that the FB folks had to invest some time and capital to get the venture going.  Do you remember the pre-cable days of free television?  Paid for entirely by advertising?

I agree that FB and MySpace have a certain element of dehumanising personal and human contact.  But from the US, I could never just walk outside and talk to my friend in Australia.  And the phone is very expensive.  On FB we can email, play scrabble, etc.  And the fact that I don't have to pay anything for it amazes me.

On your suggestion, I will do something nice for someone today (not unlike other days).

Thank you Rational.. I totally agree. I just recently joined FB and don't even know what this advertising issue is about, but wouldn't complain if I had to pay a small fee for this service. I really wouldn't complain about the ads if I get to continue using it for free. I just got in touch with two old friends.. one that's currently living in Israel and one that's 3 states away. I'm so grateful for that! And yes, I do have daily human contact with my other friends and family :-)

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):