The Google hammer - Top Stocks Blog: Talk about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day – MSN Money
 
Search Top Stocks:

The Google hammer

Posted Oct 09 2007, 12:46 PM by Matt Koppenheffer
Rating:

What would it take for me to stop using Google?

That's the question I was asking myself this morning after reading through articles from RedHerring and Business Week. Google has shown that search is big business, and number two Yahoo!, along with Microsoft and IAC/InterActiveCorp want a bigger piece.

When it comes to regular Google users like me (I hear there are a lot of us), the question for the rest of these companies is how they're going to lure us away to their search engines. While Google doesn't have the same kind of stickiness that, say, Microsoft does in desktop software, I think snagging Google users could be just as tough.

The way that Google garnered so much popularity to begin with was by realizing that web search is a hammer. You don't need a hammer to look really pretty or have all sorts of bells and whistles, you just need it to be really darn good at hammering in nails. So while all the other search providers were worrying about how to make the hammer's handle look pretty or put strobe lights on the head, Google was focusing on making sure that its hammer was really good at hammering in nails.

Now over the past few years, Google has made itself stickier by offering other services such as email and blogging, but these were built on a similar principle -- functionality.

Being good students of what has worked for the competition, the recent redesigns (such as Ask.com) of the other search engines look a heck of a lot like Google's. That's probably a good start, but hardly enough to get users to decide to try out one of these competitors' search engines, let alone switch for good. After all, most people aren't going to spontaneously decide that, though their current hammer is in perfect working order, they're going to head to Home Depot and pick up a brand new one just for a change.

So for those chasing Google, the challenge is to either figure out how to sell people on a new hammer, or else come up with an entirely new, and more effective, tool for the job.

(Full disclosure: I do not have a financial position in any of the companies mentioned.)

Comments

 

The major problem with Google is their propensity to display shopping sites or adsense sites that know how to optimize the Google algorithms.  Additionally, Google does not have the (apparent) ability to index sites which are database driven and therefore exclude some of the most relevent sites.

I'd switch in a second, if I had the ability to exclude the fake sites, the shopping sites and include database driven sites so I could really find a result that is relevent.

From Websters dictionary:

Main Entry: goo·gle  

Pronunciation: \ˈgü-gəl\

Function: transitive verb

Inflected Form(s): goo·gled; goo·gling  \-g(ə-)liŋ\

Usage: often capitalized

Etymology: Google, trademark for a search engine

Date: 2001

: to use the Google search engine to obtain information about (as a person) on the World Wide Web  

I have a feeling this company is going to be around for a while!

Hi David,

"index sites which are database driven"

1) Do you mean that you want Google indexer to crawl databases inside firewalls?

Not sure that companies will want Google crawling its internal database and logs and slowing down their OLTP.

Or

2) Are you saying that it should crawl pages generated using data from databases?

This should happen already if this page is reachable from some URLs.

I am not too clear on the gap that you pointed to  in the Google  search engine.

Ashok

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):