<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>How to retire in slow motion</title><link>http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/smartspending/archive/2007/11/13/how-to-retire-in-slow-motion.aspx</link><description>Retiring at age 65 (or 66 or 67 , depending on what year you were born) is "so 1990s," The Dough Roller writes. Why wait until then if you can ease into it? he asks, and introduces the concept of slow-motion retirement . Start by working those 40 hours</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator></channel></rss>