Search Smart Spending:

Exotic clunkers got crushed, too

Posted Sep 24 2009, 12:15 PM by Des Toups
Rating:
Filed under: , ,

Now that the government has finished writing the Cash for Clunkers checks, it’s released a final breakdown of the models sent to the crusher.

Among the 700,000 or so vehicles removed from the roads were 39 cars barely a year old – six Dodge Avengers alone and 10 Mercury Grand Marquises alone. Lest you believe gas-sucking domestics were the only victims, 3,595 BMWs, 2,532 Lexuses and 5,342 Mercedes met their makers as well. But not a single Hummer was ditched.

Among the more exotic machinery cast off in return for a voucher worth up to $4,500:

  • 13 Porsches, among them a 1990 928 S4 with a current Kelley Blue Book value of $13,100
  • An Aston Martin DB7 Volante, one of 140 made in 1997, with a sticker topping $130,000.
  • 6 Maseratis
  • A Bentley Continental R (The original sticker in 1997 was $307,100, but AutoTrader shows a number of 1990s models with asking prices ranging from $35,000 to $124,000.)
  • An ultra-rare Buick GNX, one of just 547 built.

 You can see the whole list in .pdf form at the Cars.gov Web site. The Ford Explorer – for several years during the high-flying 1990s the best-selling vehicle in America -- was the most popular clunker, with 69,887 turned in.

Bing: Was cash for clunkers a boondoggle?  

The top-selling new vehicles through the program were:

Toyota Corolla 29,488 Honda Accord 15,922
Honda Civic 28,456 Nissan Altima 15,426
Toyota Camry 27,137 Toyota RAV4 15,255
Ford Focus 22,388 Toyota Prius 15,013
Ford Escape 21,894 Ford Fusion 13,415
Honda CR-V 20,106 Chevrolet Cobalt 13,335
Hyundai Elantra 19,797 Honda Fit 12,361
Chevrolet Silverado 16,330 Nissan Sentra 12,158
Nissan Versa 16,300 Chevrolet Aveo 11,557
Ford F-150 16,263 Toyota Tacoma 10,692

 

Comments

 

is it grand marquises or grand marquii ?

LOL at people junking cars that were probably worth more than $4500.

Almost brings a tear to my eye . . . almost

Maybe I'm missing something. Why would someone "junk" a car worth more than $4500.00 and WHY? would the government tqake it anyway. That is just plain stupid on both sides of the coin. We (the government) should refuse to pay out a cash for clunkers payment for such a situation.

Here's how it works.  The fancy car is stolen, extorted, or bartered for drugs.  The hot car gets swapped for a legitimate voucher.  The voucher is either used by the person doing the swap or bartered or sold to a third party and finally used toward a car.  End result: a US Government program actively supports money laundering.

These expensive cars most likely were junked because they had mechanical problems.   A 13k porshe who's engine and tramission is on it's last leg, but techincally "drivable" still makes sense at $4500.

a 1987 gnx, one of 547, what does this car have to do with this,  was there not a window of vehicles that qualified? just goes to show who is in charge do not even have a clue to the world we live in!

If I recall the GNX which has a turbocharged 3.8 liter V6 had EPA ratings of 17 and 24 mpg. No way it should have qualified. I'd like to kick the a$$ of the douchebag responsible for crushing one of the best muscle cars of all time. As a matter of fact I'd bet some of these exotics were hot as in "HOT" (that's stolen for the slowpokes).

A Dodge Avenger is a new clunker so getting rid of it almost makes sense. I wonder if they checked the trunks of these exotic clunkers for bodies?

Anything the federal government is involved in, I avoid like the plague.

Hey genius', u cant just turn in a cash for clunker without it being registered and insured for at least a year, so i hardly think that cars were Hot or laundered. Most of the exotics that we got from being traded were BMW/MERCEDES, but they had over 125k miles on them and on their last leg. We still as a dealer made out like a bandit, charging MSRP minus clunker $$$$, and the gross on most deals were still over $2500 front end on each car, Thanks Govt, I'll take it!!!!

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):