Search Smart Spending:

Who walks away from mortgages?

Posted Sep 22 2009, 03:19 PM by Teresa Mears
Rating:

Conventional wisdom would seem to dictate that someone with an excellent credit score is less likely to walk away from a mortgage than someone with poor credit.

That's not so, syndicated real estate columnist Kenneth Harney writes in a story The Washington Post headlined "Good credit scores, deadbeat choices." In fact, people with excellent credit scores are 50% more likely to "strategically default" on their mortgages -- intentionally walk away -- than are lower scoring borrowers, according to a study by credit bureau Experian and consulting firm Oliver Wyman.

Harney reported these findings from the study:

  • Strategic defaulters often go straight from perfect payment histories to making no mortgage payments at all.
  • Strategic defaults are heavily concentrated in where home values have plummeted in recent years, such as California and Florida.
  • Homeowners with large mortgage balances generally are more likely to pull the plug than those with lower balances.
  • People with credit ratings in the two highest categories are far more likely to default strategically than people in lower score categories.

Harney interviewed Piyush Tantia, a principal researcher on the study, who said the homeowners with high credit scores appear to see walking away as the most practical alternative under the circumstances.

The column doesn't discuss the merits of a short sale vs. giving the lender a deed in lieu of foreclosure vs. letting the house go into foreclosure. Nor does it explore why people with excellent credit are more likely to walk away than those with poor credit.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock at Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis has some ideas.

"The only ‘asset' many subprime borrowers have is their home,'' he wrote. "Although that asset has negative value, the homeowner may have nowhere else to go, especially if they have to put up a month's rent plus a 1-2 month security deposit in advance to rent."

In contrast, the high-scoring homeowners may have other assets and less emotional attachment to the home, plus can more easily rent another home.

"Also note the psychological factor about 'losing the only thing I ever had' for the buyers with lower credit scores," he writes.

MyBudget 360 notes that more strategic defaults are ahead in housing bubble states as option ARMs, adjustable rate and interest-only mortgages reset, confronting homeowners with higher payments on homes that aren't worth the mortgage balance.

"And you can put yourself in the shoes of someone who bought a home at the peak. Say you and your spouse bought a home in a bubble market for $500,000. Deep down, both of you felt that housing would never go down. This view was widespread. You saw for nearly 5 years homes appreciate by 10, 15, and 20 percent per year.  At the very worst, you would be able to sell your home for $600,000 or $700,000 in a few years when your loan recast. 

"Well, your home is now worth $250,000. It may never regain that peak value. Your payment will jump from $1,500 to $3,000. You can rent a similar place for $1,300.  What do you do? Many are simply electing to walk away. In a state like California with 12.2 percent unemployment this decision might be made also by necessity. Sure, they can make the payment but how much of their budget is it eating up?"

Mark Gimein at Chumpchanger believes that walking away in that situation is absolutely the right thing to do

"In story after story about the foreclosure crisis, you will find the implicit idea that borrowers who can afford to pay their mortgage should keep on paying it no matter how much their house sinks in value because they have made a promise to pay and to do otherwise would be an abuse of the system," he writes.

"Propagating this idea is good for lenders and probably good for taxpayers, but basically, it's nonsense."

Liz Pulliam Weston notes that the decision about whether to walk away is only a moral issue if you have a choice. And she offers three key questions to ask when deciding whether to hold on to your house.

What's your take? Is it always wrong to walk away from a mortgage, even if continuing to pay will deplete your savings? What if it depletes your retirement funds as well? What if you lose your job and can only pay by running up credit card debt? What if you're divorcing or a spouse has died? Should someone continue to pay a $500,000 mortgage on a home that's now worth $250,000? Or are there times when walking away (or doing a short sale) is really the best financial decision?

And what does the fact that people with the very highest credit scores are more likely to walk away say about the credit scoring system? Or are they just showing that they are, as their scores indicate, prudent when it comes to money?

Related reading:

Subprime debt's new threat to housing

Options if you're facing foreclosure

Where homeowners can find help

Comments

 

Greed got us into this mess. No study is going to account for the fact lenders got greedy and the when the market went down so did the customer. Prior good credit ratings mean absolutely nothing anymore. Banks are allowed to do whatever they please and get tax payer money to boot. Then they have the nerve to add hidden cost on money they borrowed from us.  Rich, poor or indifferent people are fighting back the only way they know how and thats to simply dump it all and start again. Only this time they will not trust the system and seek out ways to beat it. When Americans just accept anything from banks or anyone else they get what they deserve.

We bought our house over 15 years ago.  A few years ago we refinanced and put $150,000 into the house which was supposed to be a good investment.  At the time, we still had plenty of equity in the house.  It is now worth less than it was before we remodeled it.

The greed was on both sides. Buyer beware...............

How about the simple fact that borrowers with better credit are more likely NOT to have re-financed their mortgage?  It is common that an original mortgage is "No Recourse", meaning the bank HAS NO CHOICE but to accept the "keys" (i.e. posession of the property) in lieu of mortgage payments.  Re-fi's are typically WITH RECOURSE, which means that you are still on the hook for the loan balance even if you turn over possession of the house to the bank.

When a borrower mails in the keys and walks from the property under a "No Recourse" loan, he is acting lawfully in accordance with the conditions of the loan.  

Borrowers with better credit might be more financially savy and realize that paying more for a property is a bad move financially; and that "walking" is legal and will not result in BK or credit hit; and lastly that any sympathy for the lender is woefully mis-placed.

I did exactly just that.  Our house is in Tampa,FL we bought in early 2006. It went up enough in value we thought we had a cushion. I was wrong.  I needed to move for my company 3 years later and its worth 50% less than we paid. Renting isnt an option, the market is flooded. We stopped paying, its the only way to get the lenders attention. Not to mention its Countrywide, which sold our loan days after we closed, then they sold themselves to Bank of America. Its all over the place. Now we are doing a short sale as the only way to salvage our credit. Our other creditors have had a hayday since the late mortgage hit our credit report. 29% interest while stil paying on time. Hopefully we can get out of this mess, its gonna take us years personally.

Sad, but true, and I believe it is going to get a lot worse........... :(

Wer'e all in this toilet bowl going round and round and round, and eventually, usless something changes drasticly, we will all end up in the cesspool of the banking systems greed and they to will eventually be right there with us. Not a pretty picture....Unfortunately, these same banks are not willing to help reduce mortgage rates for us to prevent many of these forclorsures, even buy 2% would help the borderline folks who worked so hard  all thier lives to own a home, and now that American Dream is gonefor so many hard working folks, probrably forever. Im one of those  borderline people trying to stay afloat in that toilet bowl....Good Luck to all, and God Bless!

the idea that there is a moral opligation to pay off your mortgage is a joke!!!  A home is an investment to  the bank so why whould it be anything else to you?  banks ahve no problem walking away from commercial real estate if they cannot make a profit, you should do the same.  If you can take teh hit on the rest of your credit go ahead.  WIth 20% of loans going under save up and buy another house in a few years.  Its only PR that makes you feel obligated.  

For those of us that have done everything right, still have a job, do not have credit card debt and are current on all our payment what are we to do?  If you look at your home owners insurance, you will find that your now $250,000 home has a replacement cost of $425,000 or more.  Of coarse that does not include some of the things that will not need to be replaced like the lot your house sits on.  Now what is the house worth: the $250,000 that all the home is the area are being sold for in the bank created depressed market or the $425,000 plus amount your home owners insurance company wants you to protect your investment for?  If the former the insurance companies would be crazy to pay out that much to replace your home if they can go down the street and buy the same house for $250,000.  If the latter why are we being appraised for depressed home sales when we try to sell and are not depressed or being foreclosed on. Shouldn't we all walk away until the playing field is leveled?

WHAT EVER HAPPEN TO BUYING A HOME TO LIVE IN AND RAISE A FAIMLY AND NOT SO MUCH AS A INVESTMENT LIKE STOCK TO BUILD AND SALE AND GET RICH QUICK? INVESTMENTS COME WITH TIME.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):