Search Smart Spending:

Would a tax persuade you to give up soda?

Posted Sep 17 2009, 04:14 PM by Teresa Mears
Rating:

Is it time to tax sugary drinks?

Another group is saying yes. In a paper published in the Sept. 16 issues of the Journal of the American Medical Association, a group of public health experts is advocating a tax of one cent per ounce on sugary beverages, The New York Times reported. The tax would apply to soft drinks, energy drinks, sports beverages and many juices and iced teas -- but not sugar-free drinks.

According to this group's research, a beverage tax would lower consumption of soda and other sweet drinks, leading to a small weight loss and better health for many Americans.

The group calculated that for every 10 percent increase in soft drink prices, consumption declines 8 to 10 percent.

Writing in Forbes, Trevor Butterworth of Stats.org questions some of the economic assumptions behind the push for a soda tax. He notes, "while there has been a great deal of research tying soda consumption to weight gain, there has been a surprising dearth of research on whether soda taxes work, even though they have already been implemented in 33 states."

Matt at Steadfast Finances is all for a national "sin tax" on all junk food. "Why should junk food mega-consumers be allowed to contribute as much in taxes as much as the next person, but indulge in a lifestyle that will undoubtedly cause them to take more out of the Medicare system than they actually contributed during their working years?" he asks.

The soft drink industry, of course, is strongly against a soda tax.

Many frugal folk for years have advocated giving up soda to save money. Partner blogger Trent Hamm at The Simple Dollar, once a major soda addict, calculated he and his wife could save more than $1,000 a year if they quit drinking pop.

Rachel Keller at Better Budgeting stopped buying carbonated beverages and juices for her family and believes it makes them healthier as well as saving them money.

A 12-can case of pop, which costs about $3 on sale, would cost $1.44 more if there were a one-penny tax on each ounce of pop. Would that be enough to persuade you to give it up? Should all high-sugar food be taxed? Or is another approach needed to combat obesity?

We gave up sugary drinks 40 years ago and are still waiting to become thin. Maybe we need a tax on ice cream.

Related reading:

How to avoid putting on 'recession pounds'

Sticker shock: That piece of coffeecake has 400 calories

'Deflabbify' -- because being fat is bad for your budget

More 'sin taxes' ahead as states scramble for money

Comments

 

Yes it would because if it is too expensive I won't be able to afford it. I think this is a great idea and I'm glad there are concerned people in congress looking out for the health of all americans. Nothing wrong with a little guidance from our elected officials.

Coincidentally, I used to work for the Red Apple Soda Pop plant back in the early 90's and I had an idea that taxing pop would make a great deal of money. However, I didn't forsee the great gains that would be on the chemical side. Needless to say, if politicians had opened their eyes back then, we wouldn' t be in this mess today.

What a great day it would be if government went back to levying tax to pay for their proper functions to the citizens and not use taxation to enforce behavior some busy body thinks needs to be punished.

Oh wait, I forgot. Americans now believe they have the right to monitor their neighbours and force them to behave with the power of government.

Ugh, how retarded.

I am in good shape and drink soda occasionally only to relieve stress... I guess in place of cigarettes or drinking. Considering I am slightly UNDERWEIGHT (can't help it; my metabolism is insane), I find it absurd that I have to pay a tax for a periodic indulgence because SOME people can't recognize what their body can handle and still maintain its health. Way to ruin things for everyone.

I don't need a NANNY STATE telling me what to drink or eat.  How about the fatties learn some self control instead of punishing the rest of us.

We should just have a tax on fat people.  I drink Soda and am an athlete.  Maybe tax sugar itself.  

Better idea, let's tax organic whole foods.  We'll call it a stupid tax.  Stupid people hurt us all and raise costs.  I think it's dumb to pay extra for foods that likely aren't any better than commercially grown varieties.

I hate people trying to tax everything they don't use.  Soda doesn't make people fat.... PEOPLE make themselves fat by not exercising.  It would make more sense to tax video games and television.

So...we tax the heck out of the soda (for Fry's soda on sale-->$0.017 per ounce, the tax would be over 50%..the median tax rate on cigarettes is approximately 25%...IMHO, cigarettes are worse for your health than HFCS).  Then consumption of soda is reduced drastically.

Therefore, the soda companies lose profits, which results in layoffs and lost jobs.  

I don't know which is worse: my health being mediocre from a soda or two or losing my job?

This is absolutly retarded. People need to be responsible for their own actions. I don't need daddy government telling me what I can and cannot drink. This country is just getting rediculous with all of the taxes.

Alcohol is taxed so yeah, why not?  For me it's not so much about sin...in fact, tax the diet ones too.  Soda is hardly necessary for daily life and in case you have not noticed, we need the money!

Instead of taxing the innocents, can't we just sacrafice a fat person once in a while?

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):