Search Smart Spending:

Social Security news both good and bad

Posted Aug 24 2009, 02:13 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

Here's a headline that's bound to get your attention: "Millions face shrinking Social Security checks." Or how about this one? "Social Security payments sans COLA puts millions at risk." What's going on here? Are seniors getting the shaft?

Partial answer: Not really.

Because the inflation rate has been negative, the nation's 50 million Social Security recipients aren't likely to get a cost-of-living increase next year or the year after that. That hasn't happened since annual adjustments for inflation were made automatic in 1975. However, keep in mind that:

  • The monthly payment was increased by 5.8% this year, reflecting higher gas prices in 2008 that have since gone down.
  • By law, the COLA can't go down, even if prices do.
  • Seniors received $250 this spring as part of the economic stimulus.
  • If Social Security checks don't increase across the board, neither will the Medicare Part B premiums for 75% of seniors. Most of those who will see an increase in premiums have high incomes or their premiums are covered by Medicaid.

What is going up -- an average of $2 a month -- is the premiums seniors pay for the ridiculously complicated Medicare prescription drug program. About 32 million seniors are enrolled in that, The Associated Press says, and about 6 million of them have the premiums paid out their monthly Social Security checks -- so those checks will actually look a tad smaller.

Doesn't sound like such a bad deal after all, right? It seems manageable unless you're one of the many folks whose sole retirement income is Social Security. Any price increase in the essentials they buy is going to hurt, particularly if they don't own their home. Consider:

  • The average monthly check is $1,153 this year. The maximum is $2,323.
  • An MSN Money story by Liz Pulliam Weston from 2007 said: "A third of people age 65 or over rely on Social Security for 90% or more of their incomes, the Social Security Administration says. For about one out of five people in that age group, or 22%, Social Security checks are the sole source of income."
  • The Social Security Administration says: "Since Social Security replaces only about 40% of preretirement income for the average worker, it is important to have pensions, savings and investments."
  • Many people are electing to take Social Security at age 62 -- which means a smaller monthly payment than if they had waited until full retirement age -- somewhere between 65 and 67, depending on when they were born. Regardless of when you retire, you're not eligible for Medicare, a government health care program for seniors, until age 65.

Meanwhile, there are some winners in this scenario. When the COLA doesn't go up, neither does the top wage on which working people pay the Social Security tax. "The base will hold steady at $106,800 for 2009 through 2012, and then jump to $118,200 in 2013 ...," says the Congressional Budget Office Director's Blog.

Related reading:

Could you survive on Social Security?

4 secret Social Security jackpots

A hidden Social Security benefit

5 myths about Social Security

Comments

 

Sorry seniors, you get no sympathy from me on this matter. My previous job didn't provide me with a raise for 2 years, then laid me off. My new position is even more of a paycut. Social Security was never meant to be the only income for the seniors...

Wait a minute here. You say gas is down and housing costs are down and we are paying up to $15 a pound for beef and we do not need any COLA - maybe we can skip coca cola but when the cons in the "con"gress take and take and take for themselves and opt out of everything they force upon us and some flake makes a study or chart says only what the boss wants it to say = kill off the olders and give everything they have to the worthless non-working lazy youngers who are so fat that their health care will eventually cost about 100 billion more per minute than the rate for current seniors. Let's just make it mandatory that everyone over 35 be killed as Obama apparently wants. Of course the "con"gress and the president are (as always) exempt.

Finally somebody posting something other than total doom and gloom.  I wish the press would focus more on the positive news of our country instead of this constant littany of bad news and end-of-world type reporting.  There is a lot of good stuff happening in our country.  Yes, unemployment is at 10%, but that means 90% of people are working.  Maybe if we all pitch in and help some of the less fortunate folks get going in the right direction again, we could turn things around.  Maybe if some of us who have jobs agree to modest pay cuts, other people could get employment.  I for one would be happy with a 20-25% cut if it would help save someone else's job...  Why don't we try to come up with solutions instead of just wringing our hands and talking about how awful everything is???  Let's start by voting out these life-long politicians and put people in there who want to get our country back on its strong feet...

The younger generation seems to forget that they would not be here if it wasn't for the seniors.  You'll be a senior soon enough.

So, here comes the change as Obama has stated in campaign speeches. I only hope that some of the seniors that voted for him will be forced into the poverty level over the next 2 years. Remember, even if the economy recovers, you still don't have a raise. The thing here is that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. By the way, has anyone heard if congress is taking a pay cut for the next 2 years? Maybe they'll get those new planes they wanted not that Social Security has cut back on frivolus speending. God bless the USA and vote those dumb democrats out of congress. Lefty

Now is the time for AARP to come to the forefront for the seniors. It might stop the bleeding and membership cancellations bought on by agreeing with Obama's health care and euthanasia program. Go to work now AARP or forever hold your piece.

Why don't those we get paid zillions of dollara a year have to pay SS on all their income like I do?

The COLA is figured on the COST OF LIVING INDEX, It has nothing to do with the state of the economy good or bad.....It also has nothing to do with President Obama, these laws were put into place long before he thought of being president... Do some research on the Social Security website, I have found that the Social Security Administration is the most helpful and most accurate government agency... Most people have no idea how SS payments are figured out. Most of the info that circulates is rumor and not true at all... SS payments will not decrease, although deductions may increase, the same as all medical INSURANCE does. I have been drawing SS for the past 5 years and and glad the program is there...don't forget it is not a cut in benefits it is just not a raise in benefits in keeping with the law...

hey lefty; if it wasn't for those "dumb democrats" there would be no social security, or medicare or medicaid or anyother safety net for many destitute people.  but i doubt if you repuglycans care about that!

AARP was paid 500 million by insurance companies .AARP latest magazine76 pages TOUTS 200 companies who want to sell you something.AARP owns NOTHING but a magazine in which they try to sell seniors something.AARP tell seniors what companies you own and how much you made from the hundreds of companies you TOUT

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):