Search Smart Spending:

Is airline policy for obese passengers fair?

Posted Apr 16 2009, 03:16 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

United Airlines announced that it's following the lead of sister airlines and will now charge obese passengers for a second seat in certain situations. The Wall Street Journal's The Middle Seat Terminal blog reports that the airline is responding to almost 700 complaints from passengers who were squished by fat seatmates.

The Terminal asks a good question: Is this fair to overweight people?

Here are the particulars of the new policy: (Actually, take time to read the entire policy because many news and blog reports about it were inaccurate.):

Who is affected: passengers who can't fit within a single seat, don't fit within a seat belt extender, and/or can't put their armrests down.

When it applies: only if the plane is full and the overweight passenger can't be seated next to a free vacant seat.

What is required: The passenger must purchase an upgrade on the same flight or, if an upgrade is not available, the passenger must change his or her ticket to the next available flight with vacancies and purchase a second ticket. The cost of that ticket will be the same as the original ticket. No fees will be charged for the change of flights. If the passenger decides not to travel, the cost of the original ticket will be refunded.

An airline spokeswoman said flights often are not full these days, so an overweight passenger likely will be able to sit next to a vacant seat and not have to upgrade or buy a second ticket.

Some online commenters said the policy is unfair.

WSJ reader "Kind Hearted" covered a variety of issues, including the size of the seats: "Isn't this discrimination of some sort? All heavy people are not overeaters and most are sensitive about their weight. If airlines provided decent seating this would not be a problem. I am a small person and still feel like a sardine."

Many were not so tender-hearted. "Barbie Jet Driver" wrote, "Right on! Since 63% of Americans are fat or obese, it only serves that they should pay extra for their lack of self-control."

Readers of Still Traveling at AJC.com came down solidly on the side of the airline, so much so that "SayWhat" commented, "Wow. I've always been overweight, and thank God I've never met any of you self-centered fat-people haters!"

United says many other airlines have similar policies, and that's true. For instance: :

  • Southwest says plus-size passengers should buy a second seat when they buy the first one. If the plane has empty seats, they get a refund for the second seat, which Southwest says happens 97% of the time, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.
  • JetBlue Airways requires a second seat and doesn't give a refund, reports MSNBC.
  • Delta Air Lines will seat obese passengers next to an empty seat if one if available. If not, they'll be asked to buy an extra seat on a later flight.
  • American Airlines doesn't require purchase of a second ticket, and treats each case individually.

Related reading:

Talk back: Should obese air travelers pay more?

What if no one were fat?

Airline might charge for bathroom use

What does it cost to drop 30 pounds?

Comments

 

Policy is fair. Why should the rest of us suffer ?

Yes it's fair. Unless someone is willing to share the cost of my ticket they have no right to make my flight uncomfortable. I have been in that situation and it could be taken to the next level,unwelcomed physical contact. Or as it has been said,"get out of my personal space."

I am overweight but I side with the airlines.  I don't think it is fair for them to have to give two seats to someone who is overweight when at times they can get revenue from that seat.  Southwest airlines has a very fair policy

On a recent flight with my family from Sacramento to Florida I gave my husband the aisle seat and sat in the middle seat. The lady next to me asked if she could put the arm-rest up and I said "absolutely not" and felt no regrets. She spent the flight from Sacramento to Houston turned towards the window and STILL took up portions of my meager seat area. I fit into the seat, I shouldn't feel bad that I want someone else to fit into it as well. My comfort is AS IMPORTANT as anyone else's and since I choose not to overeat and exercise I shouldn't be punished by having 1/3 less a seat than the person who's too large for their seat area!

yes, it is fair. if i buy a seat, i buy a seat. i don't want nor expect somebody's butt stiicking over half of my seat and i deserve the arm rest I paid for. their overweight problem should not become mine.  

These decisions are going to lead to some serious lawsuits at some point...can these airlines really afford that?

Personally, I think thought needs to go into an upgrade of the airlines and their sardine-like seating, which is just for the sake of selling more tickets.

I do not agree with this decision, and even though this does not apply to me, it think it is some form of discrimination.

I can appreciate both sides of this. But, the seating is very tight on all planes, and very uncomforable for the obese and the skinny. I have traveled both as a heavy set person weighing in at 294 lbs and had to have a seatbelt extender and then after losing 120lbs traveled on airplane again and I was just as uncomfortable and was still touching the person next to me weighing in at 174lbs. So I think it is wrong that the airlines are doing this and would be very humiliating to the obese traveler.

Absolutely!  Of course it is more than fair!  I have flown on 3 seperate floghts where the person occupying the sea next to me  had to wear a belt extender..."AFTER"... the arm rest was lifted so that the overflow from their bodies could flow over into my seat.  On one flight I flew with the mans body in probaby 1/3 of my seat as well as his right leg and foot entirely over into ny foot area.  Because I chose to sit in silence, I was forced to put one foot on top of the other and press them against the wall of the plane.  I was praying for a smooth landing as any major flaw could have resulted in my being crushed to death! As I said, I had flown in that fashion 3 times, and I will "never" ever fly that way again!!! I don't understand how someone that is oversized could be that inconsiderate.  It makes me wonder .........and someone could be 'offended' by cigarette smoke?  I was utterly offended by my situation, but apparently that carries no weight.  Once the world got started with all that "offended" riciulousness it ran like wildfire. Now it's my turn.

It all goes back to ...What goes around comes around!

i understand the reasoning; however, if someone is booked on a time sensitive flight---trying to get to funeral or a wedding or to see a sick loved one---it seems unfair to make them take a later flight if an extra seat is not available on the original one. the airlines will face problems with this; it is not the same as missing something because of unforeseen circumstances, such as a storm. i think airlines would be wise to keep this in mind. maybe they should mention weight policies on the phone at the time of purchase or have some kind of box for it when purchasing online tickets to prevent delays in travel plans.

also, if a fat person is traveling with a number of people, this will be a problem, too. for example, if a family does not want to be separated from a heavy loved one, this will cause major rescheduling issues.

It is a fair policy, I have had severaltrips that were very uncomfortable due to large person in the next seat

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):