Search Smart Spending:

Your choice: Butt-ugly and loaded or poor and sizzling HOT

Posted Mar 17 2009, 03:32 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

Some people are physically unattractive and wealthy. Some are poor and very cute. If you had to choose between the two, which would you pick?

J. Money opened that discussion at Budgets are Sexy. Here's the question he asked:

Would you rather be attractive as hell BUT you never make more than $30k a year for the rest of your life, or  you're pretty damn ugly BUT you're as rich as Oprah Winfrey?

Get the picture? Your choice is between butt-ugly with lots of money and fabulous but barely squeaking by.

(Yes, we know that this exercise is just as silly as planning what you'd do if you won the lottery. But that hasn't stopped you, has it? Besides, it may shed some light on your values.)

After weighing the pros and cons of each, J. Money decided he's rather be hot. "Being attractive certainly has its perks: more opportunities to meet hotties of the opposite sex, better possibilities of getting great jobs, getting into more parties, getting away with more stuff (or so i'm told)," he says.

Several schools of thought emerged from reader comments:

I'd rather be rich. Several said they'd go with the money and use it to do good works. "I would love to be able to throw myself into charitable works, help out my friends and family. They give me all the love I need," blogger Dawn said.

(We agree. As the Temptations sang so beautifully, beauty's only skin deep.)   

I'd rather be hot. Others said hotness comes with its own benefits -- guys swarm to help you if you're an attractive woman and your tires need air, etc. Plus, who cares if you make only $30,000 if your SO is generous and wealthy. (Think gold digger.) "If you're that hot, you can marry someone rich!" Kameee exclaimed.

Others mentioned a third option: Use the money to give you what nature did not. "Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy you the best trainers, dietitians, and plastic surgery," 'The Weakonomist' said.

Related reading:

The awesomest compilation of weird and crazy jobs ever

Invest in your own happiness

Proof that money doesn't buy happiness

How much money is enough?

Comments

 

I would rather be attractive. Feeling good about your appearance would help a lot more than money.

No question... I would much rather be ugly and rich. And I only say that because J.Money said that "rich" is defined as "Oprah rich." That's huge! Do you even understand how rich that lady is? Think of all the stuff you could buy that would replace your sorrow for being ugly?! :)

http://www.financialnut.com

I will be ugly and rich, and then I will get a good plasti surgeon , a physical trainer and a good chef to make me pretty!!!

Just kidding

This reminds me of the Dilbert cartoon where Wally is asked whether he would rather be well-paid and see his worked burned at the end of each day, or low-wage but valued. He responded by saying "heck, both are better than my current job" :-)

That being said, I would have to say ugly and rich is probably the way to go. Looks fade, and the super-attractive seem to have a much harder time dealing with age-related changes in appearance. Also, poor people often work jobs that require dealing with the general public - I'm guessing that super-attractive poor people probably experience as much harassment as flattery. And it would be a lot of fun to use all that money to benefit myself and others. I think that good works and philanthropy would negate any social barriers caused by the ugliness. And hey - if you're ugly and mean like Leona Helmsley, you can just self-isolate and get a dog that bites people, right?

I say choose ultra hot and then hook up with a butt ugly. Because isn't that the way things work, super hot woman with an older ugly rich guy. Why is Anna Nicole Smith coming to mind?

..having lived on well under 30k for most of my adult life, I can tell you that life is what you make it and can be pretty darn awesome even when you are "poor"...if only I also got to be "HOT" in addition to being poor! :) This is how I stretch my money: sugarmamabakingco.wordpress.com

Aristotle Onassis, a short man, is alleged to have remarked that he looked attractive to the ladies when he was standing on a pile of his money.

Then there's the famous (and perhaps apocryphal) George Bernard Shaw retort to a beautiful but vapid woman who said they should get married and produce children because she was gorgeous and he was brilliant. George allegedly replied something along the lines of, "Yes; but what if they'€™re born with my looks and your brains?"

Being happy with yourself is more important to having a happy life than having "stuff".

My observation as a guy: if a female is good looking and poor she can still write her own ticket. Plenty of guys like the trophy, I hate to say. Somewhat shallow an observation? Sure, but it plays out in offices all over the country. My neighborhood is loaded with men in their late 50s with 28-year-old wives. First marriage for her, second or third for him (as he moves up the ladder). She's often out jogging with her friends, some of whom push the three wheeler stroller.

This occasionally happens with men, but despite all the hew and cry about female empowerment it is still quite rare.

a notable quote from www.hotandcoolsingles.com  ...  "  if you are ugly and single, chances are that you will remain single  "

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):