Search Smart Spending:

Some iPod fans reluctant to benefit from lawsuit

Posted Jan 27 2009, 02:34 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

Due to the settlement of a class-action lawsuit, people who purchased a first-generation iPod Nano that lacked an anti-scratch coating can claim up to $25. Unlike most class-action cases, where consumers are gleeful to get a little monetary revenge, some loyal Apple customers have said in online forums that they're not going to file a claim.

"Many are saying ‘Why should I make a claim? It worked and I loved it! Sure, it scratched easily but I still used it. I'm not going to take Apple's money!" says a TCA Staff Tidbit at TopClassActions.com.

The lawsuit stemmed from the absence of a protective coating on some first-generation iPod Nanos. Those who didn't get a free slip case with their original purchase can file a claim for $25; those who did can apply for $15. About $17.7 million is available to pay the claims.

The TCA tidbit makes several points:

  • The iPods should have had a protective coating.
  • If people don't file claims, Apple won't get the money back. Any unused funds, under terms of the settlement, will be donated to charity.
  • Lots of people could use an extra $25 right now.
  • It makes no sense not to file a claim.

"You won't be helping Apple in any way by not making your claim," the tidbit says. "If you don't need the cash, leave it on the table and be charitable in an indirect way, but don't think you're doing Apple a favor."

Claims are due by June 10. Go to the settlement Web site to find out if you're eligible. You can also file a claim there.

Related reading:

Apple astounds

When to fix -- or ditch -- your iPod

Apple cuts prices for iTunes

TopClassActions.com: Here's news you can use

Comments

 

NOBODY FILE A CLAIM!!!...With the economy the way that it is if NOBODY files a claim the money will got to charity. What a beautiful way to help those less fortunate in these economic times!!! It can go to shelters for the homeless, soup kitchens for those struggling to eat a decent meal ect. Do the right thing people and let the money do some REAL GOOD!!! Help your neighbor!!! After all....its not like this i-Pod Nano didnt function now is it?

For the life of me, I can't understand why someone is and is allowed to sue a company because its product get scratched!!!. American laws allow this type of behaviors and this is a typical nonsense that needs to be addressed. When anybody can write a check to themselves it is the beginning of the end of a society.

Frankly I think that people suing for any stupid little thing has in some way contributed to the economy being the way it is.  

No claim from me

And the big winner of the lawsuit....the damn lawyers.  I mean really the consumer who really felt like they got the short end of the stick because there ipod scratches get $25 (not really worth it) but I wonder what those bastards (lawyers) got of the settlement.

The attorneys take home 4.5 million.

This happened a few years ago with Netflix.  Someone file a frivilous lawsuit over not getting their movies within one day.  I refused to benefit from that settlement.  I felt it was stupid, just like this one.  They make scratch resistant covers for iPods, use it.

oh Phleease...  and yet, I had a dr put infected mesh in me and the resulting problems took almost 4 years to find... to late to file suit. mega $$$ on new dr's and hospitals not to mention depression from the resulting problems the 1st dr caused.. but we can file suit on a company because we the consumer scratched it?  how insane is that?

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):