Search Smart Spending:

Feds crack down on credit card companies

Posted Dec 18 2008, 02:30 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

This post comes from Mark Huffman at partner blog ConsumerAffairs.com.

As expected, federal banking regulators approved a final rule today that addresses longstanding consumer complaints about credit cards.

The action was taken by the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Federal Reserve and the National Credit Union Administration. The banking industry called it "unprecedented in scope."

The rule bans practices often cited as unfair to consumers, such as raising the interest rate on an existing credit card balance when the consumer is paying the credit card bill on time.

But none of this is going to happen right away. The rule change takes effect July 1, 2010.

"I am extremely proud that OTS leadership has culminated in this important rule to ensure fair treatment for the millions of Americans who use credit cards," said OTS Director John Reich. "The rule will enhance public confidence in financial institutions and establish a level playing field for institutions that want to do business fairly without suffering competitive disadvantages."

The rule requires that consumers receive a reasonable amount of time to make their credit card payments, prohibits payment allocation methods that unfairly maximize interest charges and, in the subprime credit card market, limits fees that reduce the credit available to consumers.

"In seeking to address concerns expressed by policymakers and consumers, the Fed has severely restricted or prohibited card issuers from engaging in certain practices such as 'universal default,' 'double-cycle billing,' and raising interest rates on existing balances," said Edward L. Yingling, president and CEO of the American Bankers Association. "The basic principles contained in many legislative proposals are reflected in these regulations."

And as far as Yingling and his fellow bankers are concerned, that's a good thing.

"The disclosure requirements, which are the result of several years of consumer testing undertaken by the Fed, are a dramatic improvement over the existing legalistic disclosures," Yingling said. "The new regulations will fundamentally alter the relationship that cardholders have with their banks and the way that banks communicate with cardholders."

The most dramatic change consumers should see in the new rule is a longer window in which to make their monthly payment. A common complaint has been that credit cards often shorten the payment window, making a late payment fee more likely. Under the new rules, banks, thrifts and credit unions must ensure that credit card statements are mailed or delivered at least 21 days before the payment due date.

Those who have existing balances will not see their interest rate raised. When consumers have two different balances, credit card companies will not be allowed to allocate all of the consumer's payment to the lower interest balance, maximizing the interest charge to the consumer.

Consumers who are making on-time credit card payments will not see the terms of their agreement change simply because of a change in their overall credit rating.

One section of the rule directly attacks "advance fee" credit cards. Companies can't charge consumers a fee for simply opening an account if the charge would use most of the consumer's credit line.

Related articles:

Thaw out your frozen credit

Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights: What it means for you

New Citi rates: Should you opt out?

Comments

 

So true, Realist, Steve from Plano and Jean.

 These Robbers are well-schooled, and if I didn't know better I'd say they have OTS in their pants pocket!  18 Months!  

 Maybe they think everyone in the public attends the "school for the gifted" where the door reads PULL! and the fellow breaks into a lather of sweat trying valiantly to PUSH the door!

  No peasant here--wonder why those bankers STILL refuse to throw the public a few crumbs of our own money?  So true that a customer would have a couple of weeks to get it right, but Thugs get 18 months.

 No different than Goldman-Sachs rolling out the $ millions of public-financed bonuses for their assistant Thugs who got the U.S. public into the bailout business!  Their excuse?  They need to keep the 'talent' (their higher level managers...the ones that assisted them and the country into this mess!)

 The OTS 'Final Rule' reminds me of a judge who sentences a serial murderer to life in prison to curtail his crimes, but decides he should be let out for an 18 month killing spree before he starts to serve his time!

 I don't see OTS as being any different than the federal regulators who got us here, those who didn't even check out good buddy Madoff when whistle blowers tried to get their attention a few years ago, or Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Semi-professional theives, the Bail-Out distributors who won't tell the public the specifics of where the billions are going, or the Big 3 who ignored facts and ran auto companies into the ground, then came to congress with their hands-out, like impoverished beggars on their private jets.  I say corral them all and send them on a one-way flight to Iran.

 Anyone here going to the "school of the gifted" believing that these swindlers deserve 18 months to continue draining us like vampire bats?  

 A dog will bark like a dog.

 A cat will yowl like a cat.

 A Crook will smell like a banker.

 A banker will smell like a Crook!

Chase thinks we are idiots.  They gave us a 3.9% BT for life of BT and now keep sending us lower teaser rates for a short time hoping that we will bite and then be on the hook for the higher interest rate on the new BT which would only have payments applied to the higher rate after the 3.9% rate is paid off.

This is just another "we are working for you" stunt by a government entity that amounts to nothing significant.  I find it incredible that the American consumer/tax payer is footing the bill for major companies to remain in business only to find those same companies still willing to put it to their benefactors/customers.  Something significant would be across the board interest rate limits of 12 to 15 per cent maximum without outrageous fees for being late, etc.  

Quite  impressive as our goverment once again lags the common respect of the pepole, As they line there pockets with money overflowing and the consumer empties theres, Just to keep the collection man from calling it is another way to show our Gov and the land i fought to keep free is no longer free...

Many senetors have recived enormous compensation from the credit card companies but yet we the tax payer layed out over "500 billion" and growing without asking our approval to bail out the same banks who have turned and once again dipped there hands into our pockets knowing there is no reprecussion because they have greased the palms of our voices ( Senators) this not """"exclued presidential elect Obama""""" who reported recieving millions' in donations for his campaign.

When will it stop!.

It's a hostage situation.

Just like in the Matrix - we're just batteries feeding our corporatized government.

But to a certain extent we allowed it while trying to live the American dream.

We let true democracy get stolen from under our noses by too much comfort.

It's really up to each one of us to do something to get it back - if it matters more than comfort that is.

From today's headlines:

Federal regulators today (18 Dec 2008) adopted sweeping new rules for the credit card industry that will shield consumers from arbitrary increases in interest rates and inadequate time to pay the bills, among other changes.

The changes, which take effect in July 2010, mark the most sweeping clampdown on the credit card industry in decades.

_____________________________________________________________________

All fine and good for complaining consumers, but allowing providers a year and a half to comply means certain UNSCRUPULOUS credit card companies will try to squeeze the most bang for the buck from their customers by quickly, VICIOUSLY, raising rates in the interim.

Certainly USAA MasterCard would not stoop so low as to raise their rates sometime during this loophole period?

They would?!

Well then, certainly USAA MasterCard would not stoop so low as to INSTANTLY raise their rates and mail out customer notifications to arrive the VERY SAME DAY Federal legislation is enacted and announced publicly?

Why, look what I just found in my mailbox...

I think that we should contact the government officials and talk about gettting this enacted a lot sooner.

I also think that it is a powerful weapon for people.  Don't be afraid of these companies!  So now you use this when they call you.  It is the fear of "damaging your credit" or other such threats that scare people into caving.  

I wouldn't go so far as to call it a revolution but if we can stop being afraid you would be surprised at how quickly the companies will fold...and stop the threats.  Trust me I used this announcement yesterday and they person shut up quick!!!

Contact your senators and representatives!  Its time for Americans to speak up!  We have been silent for too long!

Another dog and pony show!Why don't we all cut up our cards,and be done with it.Oh yeah,the CC companies wouldn't make any money!18 months for us to get zapped from the CC companies.Lets see,you've made your payments on time for a year,gotta charge a fee for that.You pay off your balance in full every month,fee for that too.You didn't make any charges for the last 3 months,fee for that!Until we are all fee'd out,our debt will consist of fees,no charges.

It is about time the Fed realised what the banks in America are doing! Universal Default and basing credit in relation to your whole profile or doing business with other creditors, is the most horrifying thing that a bank can do to a consumer. This practice even affects consumers who has one small thing happen, even if it wasn't something that was directly the cause of them, or inaccurate, misinformation on a person's credit profile. I am so glad the Fed has issues these rules and mandates for banks. The practice of raising interest rates whenever banks like, lower credit limits for even the best of their customers, charging rediculous fee's to do balance transfers, are over. I have credit card's with American Express, Bank of America, Citibank, Chase and HSBC. American Express is the WORST credit card bank I have ever had. Not only do they come up with biased, pathetic excuses to limit a credit limit because of the place of business you shop at, but try to nickle and dime you everywhere they can. I am a person who pays all my credit card balances at the end of the month, but even that has not stopped American Express from deciding to put practices they have implemented to other consumers not paying on time, on to me. I lived in Hong Kong now, and all the credit here is based solely on the banks you get credit from and only that. We don't have a "national" credit bureau, so each creditor bases their decision on extending credit based on your credit history with THAT bank, and that bank only. All the banks on America were doing that before the late 90's, early 2000. We as consumers need protection from biased, unfair, deceptive practices, and with the economy in the state that it is in, at the present time, we couldn't have asked for a better time for the Fed to make these decision. It's too bad we have to wait till 2010... They should start implenting the policy now. The post's here all come down to one similar conclusion.. we are just better off paying our loans and credit back now, and it is better in the long run. The banks had better start deciding which is the way to go, otherwise we as the consumer will turn a blind eye, and tell the banks to take a hike. It is our decision and ours alone, whether we want to do business with a particular bank.

The Feds should start the ban immediately, 2010 is far too late unless they want to give the banks more time to rake in huge profits and bankrupt consumers even further. It's all BS again from government still acting as if they really care about main street but obviously protecting the financial sector more.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):