Search Smart Spending:

Feds crack down on credit card companies

Posted Dec 18 2008, 02:30 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

This post comes from Mark Huffman at partner blog ConsumerAffairs.com.

As expected, federal banking regulators approved a final rule today that addresses longstanding consumer complaints about credit cards.

The action was taken by the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Federal Reserve and the National Credit Union Administration. The banking industry called it "unprecedented in scope."

The rule bans practices often cited as unfair to consumers, such as raising the interest rate on an existing credit card balance when the consumer is paying the credit card bill on time.

But none of this is going to happen right away. The rule change takes effect July 1, 2010.

"I am extremely proud that OTS leadership has culminated in this important rule to ensure fair treatment for the millions of Americans who use credit cards," said OTS Director John Reich. "The rule will enhance public confidence in financial institutions and establish a level playing field for institutions that want to do business fairly without suffering competitive disadvantages."

The rule requires that consumers receive a reasonable amount of time to make their credit card payments, prohibits payment allocation methods that unfairly maximize interest charges and, in the subprime credit card market, limits fees that reduce the credit available to consumers.

"In seeking to address concerns expressed by policymakers and consumers, the Fed has severely restricted or prohibited card issuers from engaging in certain practices such as 'universal default,' 'double-cycle billing,' and raising interest rates on existing balances," said Edward L. Yingling, president and CEO of the American Bankers Association. "The basic principles contained in many legislative proposals are reflected in these regulations."

And as far as Yingling and his fellow bankers are concerned, that's a good thing.

"The disclosure requirements, which are the result of several years of consumer testing undertaken by the Fed, are a dramatic improvement over the existing legalistic disclosures," Yingling said. "The new regulations will fundamentally alter the relationship that cardholders have with their banks and the way that banks communicate with cardholders."

The most dramatic change consumers should see in the new rule is a longer window in which to make their monthly payment. A common complaint has been that credit cards often shorten the payment window, making a late payment fee more likely. Under the new rules, banks, thrifts and credit unions must ensure that credit card statements are mailed or delivered at least 21 days before the payment due date.

Those who have existing balances will not see their interest rate raised. When consumers have two different balances, credit card companies will not be allowed to allocate all of the consumer's payment to the lower interest balance, maximizing the interest charge to the consumer.

Consumers who are making on-time credit card payments will not see the terms of their agreement change simply because of a change in their overall credit rating.

One section of the rule directly attacks "advance fee" credit cards. Companies can't charge consumers a fee for simply opening an account if the charge would use most of the consumer's credit line.

Related articles:

Thaw out your frozen credit

Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights: What it means for you

New Citi rates: Should you opt out?

Comments

 

Banks/credit card compaines have until 2010?

Guess what banks/credit companies will do with that liberty? They will maximize rates before the law even becomes effective.

Is this move really advantageous for the consumer?

I bet I can guess consumer answers on this one.

now the banks have 18 months to raise their rates and raise fees before thr rules kick in that are supposed to help the consumer.    Some help,  make the rule effective in one month to help the american consumer and the economy  

Uh, no, "f" (charming handle, BTW).  It's the fault of Reganomics.  These banks went hog wild when they pushed for--and got--deregulation when Regan was President.  

Isn't interesting that the abuses sought to be addressed by these reforms are and will remain common and legal practices until July 2010.  These are the folks who are asking for a bailout.  Three years ago when they lobbied Congress to reform bankruptcy, they were reaping the highest profits they had ever seen.  

We need help now , not two years from now, that is not doing us any good, and people will get where they cannot pay these bills, and more credit mess, if the banks cut interest themselves, they would be more likely to get their money.

This rules will not help our economy before 2010. The goverment needs to go back to collage and get an intensive economy course, how to help our economy sooner. They are lack of new ideas.

“News is what powerful people want to keep hidden.  Everything else is publicity.”

-  Bill Moyers of PBS NOW

This wasn't news, it was a PR stunt to appease the peasants.  People being hurt by the present system will be drowned and buried by the time (IF) this "change" ever takes place.

TO LITTLE TO LATE, they should enact it now not wait tilll 2010 . Aslo, put in a rate lowering and freeze of 8%. Also, have them stop with the daily compounded interest. Limit credit lines to $5,000.00 Max and only one credit account per person. Also, credit cards only to people 25 years and older.

maybe if enough of us could contact our senate or who ever can get it to happen now, hhhmmmm that was a laugh on my part. I think it should be done imediantly

why are they given 18 months?? When they do things to the consumers, we get two weeks!!  It ned to be done immediately!!

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):