Search Smart Spending:

There's plenty of pork in Wall Street rescue

Posted Oct 03 2008, 05:46 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

Doesn't this sound like something from David Letterman -- "Top 10 tax sweeteners in the bailout bill"? But this is no joke. It's a partial list of the pork included in the $700 billion Wall Street bailout Congress approved today. The list was prepared by the nonpartisan budget watchdog Taxpayers for Common Sense.

This explains why the once-brief bailout plan expanded to 451 pages. Senators added about $150 billion in tax breaks to overcome resistance to the bill. It worked, but it's prompted howls of complaint. "I believe there was even a tax cut for poodles who earn money in dog shows," wrote Jazz Shaw at The Moderate Voice. (That was a joke.)

Who benefits from all of these tax breaks? Here are a few examples:

    • Makers of wooden arrows for kids. They get an exemption from an excise tax apparently intended for serious arrows used by adult archers. Bloomberg News says the tax break is worth $200,000 to Rose City Archery in Myrtle Point, Ore. Cost to taxpayers: $2 million over 10 years.

    • Speedway owners. Race tracks get to keep a seven-year depreciation timetable. The IRA wanted to change it to 15 years. Cost to taxpayers: $100 million over two years.

    • Rum-makers in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. They get a two-year extension of a $13.25 rebate on a $13.50 per proof gallon excise tax charged on rum imported to the U.S. Cost to taxpayers: $192 million.

    • Companies that do research in the U.S. They get a two-year extension of a tax credit. "Companies that have benefited from this provision include Microsoft Corp., Boeing Co., United Technologies Corp., Electronic Data Systems Corp. and Harley-Davidson," Taxpayers for Common Sense says. (Full disclosure: Microsoft owns MSN Money.) Cost to taxpayers: $19 billion.

    • Movie and television producers. A tax incentive is intended to keep production here in the U.S. Cost to taxpayers: $478 million over 10 years.

    • Wool producers and makers of wool clothing. This tariff relief will cost $148 million over five years.

    Some of the pork -- we mean "provisions" -- in the bill extends tax breaks that are already in place, and some are new. (See the Taxpayers for Common Sense article for details.)

    Of course, some of the pork bits can sound downright appealing, depending on your point of view. There are tax incentives for businesses that encourage their employees to commute by bicycle ($10 million); corporations and ag producers that donate food ($149 million); and groups that donate books to schools ($49 million). A fund that provides health care to retired miners will get a boost. The bill also extends tax breaks for renewable energy.

    Overall, the bailout contains an estimated $150 billion in tax breaks, including $62 billion in the form of the dreaded alternative minimum tax that otherwise would have been collected from 24 million households this year.

    But did these incentives have to be added so quickly to the unpopular bailout? Many bloggers think not. "No one, no one can sensibly claim that the pork deserved to be in the 'emergency' bill on the economy," said the staid Business Law Prof Blog.

    Comments

     

    I think our biggest problem is that we're too lazy to check out the people we're voting for each election. Their voting records  and their support and introduction of some bills in the past is what's important to us.

    It seems to me that we want to believe what they say, but what they say is only meant to be what they think will get us to vote for them.  Once we vote, most of what they said is forgotten.

    We need to know the names of the politicians that introduced the pork (earnarks) so that we can vote against them the next time around.  Bush could have vitoed any or all of these earmarks, but as you can see the only thing he really cared about is saving his buddies. I doubt that this action will help the middle class for long.  

    It looks like our political system has the same attitude that organized crime has, " No one wants to tell on anyone else" , and as long as that attitude lasts none of us is going to know what they're keeping from us untill after they're elected.

    How about instead of voting which party gets in office

    We make both of them work togather to figure out a soultion

    to this incredable mess we call our government

    Both sides have good points....why do we have to choose ....one (and exclude the other)

    They should all be their to help all of us...lets make them do it

    this partisan crap is BS....time to grow up....elect both of them

    I think the time has come for the American people to have the final say on what passes as law - our lawmakers have abused the powers that we have given them and the "pork" written into this bill is just further proof of this.  They have taken advantage of "we the people" to the extent that they have forgotten who are the employees and who are the employers!  We pay THEIR salaries and they have forgotten that.  They load these bills with "pork" with complete disregard to what it is that "we the people" want, need and can afford!  I agree with GRANDMA MARGIE - we need to march!

    REVOLT - at the polls in November.  Make sure you register - BEFORE the October deadline and VOTE.  Educate yourself on the candidates and get rid of the crooks.  Don't listen to someone YOU thinks knows more than you.  Go with YOUR gut and think for yourself.  Who stands for what YOU stand for.

    The solution is quite simple. Don't reelect any public official who does not do for the good of this country. Our elected and reelected and reelected officials are not accountable to anyone.

    We continue to complain on an individual basis but never as a collective group. If enough people could get on a common ground (almost impossible) we would be able to purge the system (our elected officials(HOGS)) and put some people in that want to do the best job possible. Until that happens, and they are betting that it never will, the same old politicians with the same old greedy, archaic, good old boy syndrome will do what they have always done.

    THE PEOPLE, MASS POPULATION, WILL HAVE TO BAN TOGETHER BEFORE ANY GOOD RESULTS COME OF OUR GOVERNMENT. THE ENTIRE POLITICAL SYSTEM WILL HAVE TO BE PURGED (ALL OF THE PRESENT DAY POLITICIANS WILL HAVE TO BE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE).

    It will take about 12 to 15 years to accomplish removing all the existing suckers because of the reelection cycle, some new ones will get educated by the old ones and have to be voted out on their next reelection and some will  think they are beyond reproach and need to be removed. Once the politicians realize their real job is to serve the country in their best ability, for the country, for the world, in a limited amount of time,will our system work. Being a politician is not a job but rather a service.

    Example: How can we think by electing our present day politician, meaning McCain and/or Bama can we possibly believe there is not a whole lot of in house baggage attached to either one of them. I cannot conceive that either one of them has a real realistic idea of what is best for this country. They have been at the job as a HOG for way too long.    

    i'm so disgusted with our system i don't even know where to begin.  i all hope is obama better have some answers.

    Bail out these money mongers....all the polititians in Washington should be -----out.

    My granddaughter just lost her retirement and $20,000 investment because she works for one of those banks...but the CEO's go away with millions.

    Americans are a pretty civilized lot considering what we mistakenly call mangement of industries have pulled, and are quite upset and confused as to why these amoral, unethical, anti-American, and unpatriotic thieves get so much smoke and mirrors to hide behind.  Here's a thought for those who want this behavior strongly discouraged and stopped - let's consider lowering the cost of the bailouts (there's more than one goin' on) by using a tactic the court uses for those not-so-wealthy persons who cause damage - RESTITUTION!!!  There is no ethical reason why somebody that books with a lot of our wealth should not have to make their mis-deeds right.  Boy, would they be (in layman's terms) pissed off.  I could go for that.

    Instead of having a commentator ask questions that they think are important to Americians in the debates, why don't they let the american people ask the questions  concerning what we feel are the real issues!

    I thought this was to help the main street crowd, but it seems that Congress has been struck down with a big case of the stupid virus.  It has been said in the past few days that the 700 billion dollar bail out was going to cost every person around $2000; with the final tally near 850 billion what's it going to cost now?  $2500-3000 each.  What a bunch of stupid jerks!

    Send a Comment

    Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

    (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):