Search Smart Spending:

Low expectations for homeowner-help program

Posted Oct 01 2008, 09:32 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

The federal government's new $300 billion Hope for Homeowners program opened for business today with the intent of staving off foreclosure for 400,000 homeowners in trouble. But we just have to wonder how effective it will be.

Here's a clue, from an Associated Press report: "Lenders, rather than borrowers, will decide whether to participate in the program, which requires them to take a loss on the initial loan."

With those conditions, will banks be in a rush to participate? Apparently not. Housing Wire reported: "The emerging consensus among those in the servicing trenches that spoke with HW ... has been that the program will have less impact than legislators might hope."

Patrick Duffy of The Housing Chronicles Blog wrote, "Apparently lenders are saying, 'Thanks for thinking of us, but no thanks, we'll do our own workouts. Have a nice day!'"

Hope for Homeowners is part of the massive Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 passed by Congress in July. The program works like this: People who are struggling to pay their mortgage can ask to refinance to a 30-year fixed-rate loan equal to no more than 90% of the property's current market value. The interest rate will be based on current market  rates. The deal works only if the holder of the current mortgage agrees to accept a loss.

The Federal Housing Authority, which will guarantee the new loan, will get 5% of the new loan for its trouble. The FHA -- not the lender -- also will benefit from any appreciation in the home's value if it is sold or refinanced again at a later date.

Homeowners are eligible only if they live in the house, cannot afford the payment, and spend more than 31% of their monthly gross income on their mortgage. They must also be able to demonstrate their ability to afford the new loan. (For other eligibility requirements, click here.)

Lenders have to be willing to do the deal. They also have to be able -- not always the case with mortgages that have been packaged and sold as securities, notes Credit Slip's Adam Levitin in a Wall Street Journal column. Lenders say they'd rather reduce a mortgage's interest rate than take a loss on the principal. They see Hope for Homeowners as a program of last resort.

Meanwhile, lenders haven't been rushing to work with people who are facing the loss of their homes. Far from it. The State Foreclosure Prevention Working Group, made up of state banking officials and attorneys general, recently issued several new findings, including: "Nearly eight out of 10 seriously delinquent homeowners are not on track for any loss mitigation outcome," and "One out of five loan modifications made in the past year are currently delinquent." So much for meaningful loan modifications.

Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, who released the working group's latest report, said, "As Congress considers a $700 billion bailout package, it is our hope that wide-scale mortgage loan modifications will be a condition of any plan. A bailout that does not build in solutions to the foreclosure-driven downward value spiral will not fix the root of the problem."

Comments

 

I am shocked why NOTHING has been said about the way Bernanke raised the interest rates so often that started this whole mess. He is getting off scott free and should be replaced. I under stand he even made a comment "I did not think raising the rates would effect the mortgage industry like it has". This is coming from the one controlling the market.

Another thing that has been hidden is the way the three credit bureaus forced this SCORING system and made the investors believe that it was a safe and secure way to approve credit for someone. What happen to basic under writing principles??? The lenders thought this system had no faults even though it was proven the system was unfair and not accurate. I am a mortgage broker and have seen clients that did not pay a bill in their life with thousands of tax liens and their scores were higher than people that paid their creditors. The lenders were convinced this was a system that would help them avoid potential losses.

Even today the scores are being used and people that should be given a loan are being turned down. I have a client that is very stable and his credit score is two points below the required amount and he is turned down. This person is worth millions and has been a business man for 40 years and never missed a payment.He was turned down for because his score was 2 points low. WHAY A STUPID SYSTEM. At one time the only requirement for a credit report was one or at the most two bureaus. The credit bureaus found a way to make more money and make you pull three bureaus and use a middle score. All it did was increase their profits and did not stop them from the sorry reporting methods they use.

Why hasn't this been reported and the politicians talking about this? Could it be the millions they pay to appear clean?

HOW ABOUT WE PAY THE DEBT WE SAID WE WOULD PAY IT DOESNT MATTER IF YOUR RATE ADJUSTED YOU SIGNED FOR THAT LONA AND SHOULD BE INFORMED AND NOT MAKE DUMB DECISIONS TO BUY A HOUSE YOU MUST BE AN ADULT AND ALSO NO BODY COMPLAINED WHEN HOUSES SHOT UP AND THEY REFINACED AND PULLED OUT ALOT OF MONEY FOR POOLS AND OTHER STUFF THEN BECAUE THEIE VALUE GOES BELOW WHAT THEY OWE A BANK IS SUSPOSED TO BAIL THEM OUT LAST I CHECKED NOT ONE PERSON GOT A CALL FROM A BANK TO SAY HEY YOUR VALUE HAS DOUBLED YOU OWE US MORE MONEY FOR THAT HOUSE...PLEASE PEOPLE GROW UP AND PAY DEBTS YOU PROMISED TO PAY

I do not think it is fair to lump everyone into the same category. We got in trouble on our home, becauase our loan was sold to CitiMortgage who wanted a whole year's worth of taxes, etc paid up front in addition to our regular payment. In order to do that they raised our monthly payment by an additional $1500. They did not care...have never acted liked they cared...and do not seem bothered by the fact that what they were requesting was just not feasible. We are going to lose our home not because we cannot pay our note, but we cannot comply by their "1 year up front $$ rule". Our other mortgage company never asked for that...isn't there some regulation that states all mortgage companies have to do business the same way...The new mortgage company has ruined our credit, caused many hours of tears, grief and stress. So when you have people asking for help, it is not just ones with roving ARMs or who bit off more than they could chew...

I work in the Banking Industry and I am sick and tired of the people who come in with such bad credit and expect everyting handed to them and give us such a sob story of what a bad break they had and when you look at their credit report this bad break has been going on for years.  It is about time we all start living within our means and start being responsible for our own debt and PAY ON IT.

!!!!No...its not 3billion.......its 300 BILLION!!!!!! and YES THAT"S $750,000!!!!! PER HOMEOWNER!!!!!!!!  THIS IS INSANE

GO DENNIS!!!!!

No one put a gun to the heads of these people and forced them to borrow more money than the could afford.  Or take out a 2nd mortgage only to blow the funds on luxuries.  Yes, the financial world made getting some of these loans too easy but people have to assume some fiscal responsibility.  Why do they continually look to Washington to bail them out for their poor decisions.  Wake up people!  If we are going to increasingly rely on government to come to the rescue aren't we only one small step from Socialism?  Is that what all these beggers want?

The Feds need to make all banks refinance houses that are in forecloser at the current market price with a 30 year fixed rate, so people can stay in there houses with a claus in it for 5 years, and if any banks that donot want to work with the Feds. let them go under,and out of busioness, and not them be bailed out by the Feds, and there CEO's not get one penny out of the mess, since they don't want to help anybody out for what ever the reason is.

Shannon,   A high percentage of the crap loans aren't people that had a death, sickness or injury.  You can credit some job loss.......BUT there were not significant job losses until AFTER this was a problem.  Job losses have been the result of this....not the cause.

And yes, as a matter of fact...all those people DID chose their job.  Don't we all???  Seriously??  I have never seen a person put a gun to a persons head and tell them where they will work.  

That being said, if there are any of the first three things mentioned.....I can have sympathy for.  THat being said....in those cases there are EXISTING PROGRAMS for most of them.

Now...YOU get a life.

For people who have lost jobs I am sorry. But I didnt pick your career path. I didnt choose your home or mortgage. My tax dollars already go to programs to "help" out people in need. Programs I never endorsed or voted for. Now you want more of my money? Seriously? There are consequences to everyones decisions...drop out of school, go to college or not, choose a career or investment that is high risk high reward, have 10 children you cant support emotionally or financially, lots and lots of choices. Fair or not these choices sometimes do not work out as planned. Why are the people who get "lucky" and make good sound decisions always responsible for bailing out the ones whos life plans should I say "fail to work out". Here is an idea. Tell the tax paying American public how much it costs to defend this great nation from foreign invaders. How much it costs to run the judicial side of the government and send us our share of that bill. Everything else can be decided locally by US the people within our own states. Sell the White House. Take money gained by each partys Presidential nominee and give it back to the lobbyist in which it came. A democracy should be a fair vote by the majority of the people 1 tax payers vote at a time. Not the tainted bias system we have now.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):